Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Surely no matter what your cause if you got a message of support like that you'd keep it quiet because of how stupid it makes your supporters look, rather than boasting about it?

 

"Just 1 of the thousands of mouth-breathing fuckwits who agree with me! ??"

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think he's irredeemable but SAFC should have a cleanout of anyone who facilitated this, which must have been more than one person.

 

Are you taking the p*ss? SAFC, along with the vast majority of the cretins they call a fanbase have already deleted the whole incident from their history. I read yesterday "why do they keep saying ex sunderland player when he played for city, boro etc?"

 

Here's why. You knew. You all knew, and you all kept him in the first eleven to save your PL status, you all chanted his name like a hero, you all danced like gibbons when he scored in the 90th minute and you all hounded a child on social media to the point of suicide.

 

sunderland and their fascist defending, nonce loving, backwards racist sh*tstain fans are a disgrace to the game. But yeah, I punched a horse that time so equals pequals...

 

All of us? Stop being daft man. If you want to make a serious point then you'll never do it with ridiculous generalisations like above.  :rolleyes:

 

Well we're all horse punchers, so you lot are now the nonce supporters who like to shag dogs!

 

You lot started this trend of generalising things, so live with it! And get your finger out your dog!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

The RSPCC have complained to the FA  :lol: doubt there will be any punishment for the club, but there should be.

 

Do you mean the NSPCC or the RSPCA? Could be either. :lol:

 

Both. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well my very restrained replies correcting people on the facts of the case or things like ages of consent in different countries on his sister's Facebook support page have been deleted. Anything calling the victim a slag is still there though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can the lass and her family not press charges against his sister? Surely you're not allowed to promote the harassment of victims of sexual abuse. Or is it just one them things?

 

I assume they just want it to all fuck off like without going through court again either way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's actually quite concerning the amount of people in general who give it 'she knew what she was doing, she's old enough'.

 

Facts are the girl had just hit 15, I don't give a s*** what she thinks she is now I guarantee it'll be vastly different to what she is when she is 28 like Johnson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

It's actually quite concerning the amount of people in general who give it 'she knew what she was doing, she's old enough'.

 

Facts are the girl had just hit 15, I don't give a s*** what she thinks she is now I guarantee it'll be vastly different to what she is when she is 28 like Johnson

This is exactly the point. You know what you're doing from a very young age, the law is there because nigh on everyone looks back and thinks 'what was I doing?' with a lot of things from being that age, not least something that serious. Their opinions on it completely correlate with how much they know about it and how much they know in general. The perfect mix of arrogance and ignorance, we're living in an idiocracy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Publicly calling her a slag and promoting contradictions the court could have them sued for libel defamation. But that's an expensive process as the victim has to prove, not them disproving.

 

From what I understand it's quite the opposite. If someone writes something potentially defamatory the burden of proof in court would be on them to demonstrate that what they wrote is true, not the other way around.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's actually quite concerning the amount of people in general who give it 'she knew what she was doing, she's old enough'.

 

Facts are the girl had just hit 15, I don't give a s*** what she thinks she is now I guarantee it'll be vastly different to what she is when she is 28 like Johnson

This is exactly the point. You know what you're doing from a very young age, the law is there because nigh on everyone looks back and thinks 'what was I doing?' with a lot of things from being that age, not least something that serious. Their opinions on it completely correlate with how much they know about it and how much they know in general. The perfect mix of arrogance and ignorance, we're living in an idiocracy.

 

:thup: And layer on top of that the imbalance in the power dynamic as the age between the perpetrator and victim increases. It's ludicrous to condemn a 15 year old for not being more effective in repelling the advances of a 28 year old who has specifically targeted her. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...