Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

It’s a yearly rant so i might as well get it out the way now…

 

All loans, sell-on and buy back clauses along with multi club models should be banned.

 

If you need a player you buy him if you don’t or can’t afford him someone else gets him. This would ripple all the way down the pyramid and leave it a lot less top heavy.

 

I say this even though over the coming decades it’s exactly what we are going to benefit from. Think it’s awful and just getting worse..

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LFEE said:

It’s a yearly rant so i might as well get it out the way now…

 

All loans, sell-on and buy back clauses along with multi club models should be banned.

 

If you need a player you buy him if you don’t or can’t afford him someone else gets him. This would ripple all the way down the pyramid and leave it a lot less top heavy.

 

I say this even though over the coming decades it’s exactly what we are going to benefit from. Think it’s awful and just getting worse..

 

I'd also argue that there should be a maximum in how long you spread the payments of a transfer fee.  e.g. 1-2 years not across the length of the contract.

 

 

Edited by El Prontonise

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, LFEE said:

It’s a yearly rant so i might as well get it out the way now…

 

All loans, sell-on and buy back clauses along with multi club models should be banned.

 

If you need a player you buy him if you don’t or can’t afford him someone else gets him. This would ripple all the way down the pyramid and leave it a lot less top heavy.

 

I say this even though over the coming decades it’s exactly what we are going to benefit from. Think it’s awful and just getting worse..

 

Agreed. It's why I'm more in favour of a  salary cap (that you can't just get out of via loaning players out) than I am the FFP we've currently got. 

 

FFP is encouraging player hoarding and speculative recruitment on an enormous scale, and clubs with the resources to do so are able to reinforce the established hierarchy by effectively controlling the supply and demand of talent in the transfer market.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

Don't understand how Chelsea can do what they're doing. Makes it seems like FFP is voluntary. 


Yeah it’s very strange, but they’re clearly finding workarounds to some rules, have far bigger revenue streams and simply sell academy players for huge sums of money 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wonder what a player like Osimhen is thinking when agreeing to go to Chelsea. Is it just the size of the contract that matters or does he genuinely think they’re going to be successful as well? They’re in the conference league and seem like a mess. I always assume a player like that will demand a CL club.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm at the stage where I'm sick of us following rules and 'building slowly' - I'd like the club to test the waters and sign just 3 world class stars - 50m a pop - and see what happens. 
There's always a workaround later as Chelsea and Man C have shown us...

Imagine if Chelsea had been taken over by Arabs?! The amount of pushback they would be getting would be insane

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kimbo said:

I wonder what a player like Osimhen is thinking when agreeing to go to Chelsea. Is it just the size of the contract that matters or does he genuinely think they’re going to be successful as well? They’re in the conference league and seem like a mess. I always assume a player like that will demand a CL club.

 

Just get to the PL, London and earn loads of money I guess. Not too bad overall. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kingxlnc said:

I'm at the stage where I'm sick of us following rules and 'building slowly' - I'd like the club to test the waters and sign just 3 world class stars - 50m a pop - and see what happens. 
There's always a workaround later as Chelsea and Man C have shown us...

Imagine if Chelsea had been taken over by Arabs?! The amount of pushback they would be getting would be insane


 

World class? 50m a pop? 50m doesn’t even get Dominic Solanke

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, kingxlnc said:

I'm at the stage where I'm sick of us following rules and 'building slowly' - I'd like the club to test the waters and sign just 3 world class stars - 50m a pop - and see what happens. 
There's always a workaround later as Chelsea and Man C have shown us...

Imagine if Chelsea had been taken over by Arabs?! The amount of pushback they would be getting would be insane

PL and Uefa would come down on us like a ton of bricks

 

 

Edited by Unbelievable

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Kimbo said:

I wonder what a player like Osimhen is thinking when agreeing to go to Chelsea. Is it just the size of the contract that matters or does he genuinely think they’re going to be successful as well? They’re in the conference league and seem like a mess. I always assume a player like that will demand a CL club.

To be fair his whole Napoli career is a mess right now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, KDT said:

Chelsea have sold more £ in homegrown talent in the last 2 summer transfer windows than we have arguably in our history.  

And they still would have broke PSR rules the last two years without ridiculous hotel/ladies team sales to themselves never mind the historical offences still being 'looked at'. The whole thing stinks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...