Lazarus Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Did i miss the 'announcement'? Or was it another attention seeking false alarm? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 2 minutes ago, Lazarus said: Did i miss the 'announcement'? Or was it another attention seeking false alarm? Neither. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 20 minutes ago, Rocker said: Neither. So he didn't miss it, but it wasn't attention seeking or a false alarm? I reckon I've missed it then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 24 minutes ago, Rocker said: Neither. If he wasn't an attention seeker, he would just announce whatever he has got without this "in a few days" bs. He's an attention seeker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Honestly nothing ground breaking is coming from Keith ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Shearergol said: So he didn't miss it, but it wasn't attention seeking or a false alarm? I reckon I've missed it then. It was my understanding that the information was passed to Liam Kennedy who is waiting for the OK to publish the article? Plus, I don't think Keith Patterson gave a date at all. Could be wrong. So, no you haven't missed it, nor was it attention seeking as such (but I don't know the bloke, so who knows if he likes the attention as well). Edited April 29, 2021 by Rocker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 2 minutes ago, ToonArmy1892 said: If he wasn't an attention seeker, he would just announce whatever he has got without this "in a few days" bs. He's an attention seeker. I don't know the bloke, nor care if he is an attention seeker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 1 minute ago, Rocker said: It was my understanding that the information was passed to Liam Kennedy who is waiting for the OK to publish the article? Plus, I don't think Keith Patterson gave a date at all. Could be wrong. So, no you haven't missed it, nor was it attention seeking as such. Still a few months before July anyway. Plenty of time. #wait Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Nice one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Twitter thinks its emails confirming Masters and Hoffman were delaying the takeover on the instructions of the Big6 and that they were fully aware of the plans for the ESL, potentially accepting jobs in the executive team running it as payment for putting off the takeover. The Big6 were happy to let it through after the ESL was confirmed, last weeks events fucked everything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 2 minutes ago, Ben said: Twitter thinks its emails confirming Masters and Hoffman were delaying the takeover on the instructions of the Big6 and that they were fully aware of the plans for the ESL, potentially accepting jobs in the executive team running it as payment for putting off the takeover. The Big6 were happy to let it through after the ESL was confirmed, last weeks events fucked everything. If that's the case, why the requirement to leak it via the press? Is this purely to negate the need for arbitration? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 We are all free to interpret what Keith does but for me, his constant Twitter presence keeps the fact that the PL are corrupt in the forefront of everyone's minds. The PL may or may not be watching him. I like to think they are and get unsettled by the constant barrage of reminders of what they are up to. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 3 minutes ago, Ben said: Twitter thinks its emails confirming Masters and Hoffman were delaying the takeover on the instructions of the Big6 and that they were fully aware of the plans for the ESL, potentially accepting jobs in the executive team running it as payment for putting off the takeover. The Big6 were happy to let it through after the ESL was confirmed, last weeks events fucked everything. I mean, seems plausible. But am I fuck believing anything from Twitter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 How does this help the takeover? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 7 minutes ago, Ben said: Twitter thinks its emails confirming Masters and Hoffman were delaying the takeover on the instructions of the Big6 and that they were fully aware of the plans for the ESL, potentially accepting jobs in the executive team running it as payment for putting off the takeover. The Big6 were happy to let it through after the ESL was confirmed, last weeks events fucked everything. Quite a scoop for the shields gazette Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumbheed Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 14 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: How does this help the takeover? Removal of Masters and Hoffman? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 Just now, Thumbheed said: Removal of Masters and Hoffman? Will that mean all of a sudden it’s going to be waved through? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumbheed Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 4 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: Will that mean all of a sudden it’s going to be waved through? I can't see why not. If Masters and Hoffman were shown to be complicit in a conspired effort to delay the takeover without just cause (which does seem to be the case) then perhaps the roadblocks go away with their removal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 21 minutes ago, RS said: Quite a scoop for the shields gazette Aye. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 23 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: How does this help the takeover? Personally I feel it's the opposite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awaymag Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 (edited) 12 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: Will that mean all of a sudden it’s going to be waved through? It will be a massive bombshell if true. 1st there is the takeover issue, then there is anti competitive angle. This would blow the whole setup of the PL apart, Ashley could be sueing on multiple points and issues if this is true! Edited April 29, 2021 by Awaymag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumbheed Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 5 minutes ago, Shearergol said: Personally I feel it's the opposite. Thought you might Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 That’d be good, like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 27 minutes ago, Shearergol said: If that's the case, why the requirement to leak it via the press? Is this purely to negate the need for arbitration? I think if the messages have been have been acquired by nefarious means they would be inadmissible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thumbheed Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 12 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: I think if the messages have been have been acquired by nefarious means they would be inadmissible. Also, I'm not sure it's actually relevant to the case in hand. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now