Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 2 hours ago, Shays Given Tim Flowers said: Starting to think that the ESL was an open secret and the timing is all starting to make sense. How do you mean? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 (edited) The club have delayed pressing the button on arbitration its as simple as that. Read NDM’s views on arbitration. It may still lead to arbitration, but if you think you can force settlement through disclosure why not try that route first. The club will be massively encouraged by recent developments. Edited May 6, 2021 by Whitley mag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 14 minutes ago, Super Duper Branko Strupar said: How do you mean? Just the timing of it all at a period of time when football is under the microscope in an unprecedented way. Just wonder if there was some deliberate delay waiting for the European Superleague stuff to blow up. Just seems like a big coincidence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Interesting that the club will have the advantage of already seeing replies from the PL in relation to competition case. It’s almost as if Keith has softened them up before we go for the kill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Couldn’t agree with our favourite Dentist more. He can pull my teeth out anytime. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 So we think takeover by august? Bruce gone by then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 4 minutes ago, Whitley mag said: Interesting that the club will have the advantage of already seeing replies from the PL in relation to competition case. It’s almost as if Keith has softened them up before we go for the kill. A pathway you say? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 4 minutes ago, Shearergol said: So we think takeover by august? Bruce gone by then? I think they’re trying to force the issue every way possible. If disclosure and penalties attached to competition case are there big fear, it could be quick hopefully. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Jacobs is definitely hanging out the back of Edward's tonight Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 And finally after 500 tweets Jacobs works his way around to this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 KP on fire tonight, basking some would say... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Here, here Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Top work from Keith. Be a canny listen tomorrow night... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosenrot Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 If anyone's interested in the procedure of cases like this, look here: https://www.catribunal.org.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/The_Competition_Appeal_Tribunal_Rules_2015.pdf You'll probably want to look at the sections on the 'fast-track procedure' as well as 'disclosure'. TL;DR, under the fast-track procedure, the main substantive hearing is supposed to be within 6 months of the court deciding to put the case on the fast-track procedure. Disclosure happens early on and will include all documentation relevant to the substantive issues in the case. The play here, I guess, is to encourage the Premier League to settle rather than to disclose and allow inspection... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Just now, Rosenrot said: If anyone's interested in the procedure of cases like this, look here: https://www.catribunal.org.uk/sites/default/files/2017-11/The_Competition_Appeal_Tribunal_Rules_2015.pdf You'll probably want to look at the sections on the 'fast-track procedure' as well as 'disclosure'. TL;DR, under the fast-track procedure, the main substantive hearing is supposed to be within 6 months of the court deciding to put the case on the fast-track procedure. Disclosure happens early on and will include all documentation relevant to the substantive issues in the case. The play here, I guess, is to encourage the Premier League to settle rather than to disclose and allow inspection... Yes definitely. Get the PL to settle the arbitration case before disclosure In the anti competition case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 17 minutes ago, Scoot said: Yes definitely. Get the PL to settle the arbitration case before disclosure In the anti competition case. I thought the intention was to pressure them enough for them to lift the gate and let it through rather than have to go through arbitration, which has been said to be an absolute last resort because the chances of winning weren't very high. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
number9shirt Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Wouldn't Be surprised to see no more progress on the arbitration given the panel is stacked against us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Is the panel stacked against us? (Not having a dig, just not up to date.) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 31 minutes ago, cubaricho said: I thought the intention was to pressure them enough for them to lift the gate and let it through rather than have to go through arbitration, which has been said to be an absolute last resort because the chances of winning weren't very high. Settlement in the arbitration case would probably involve passing the deal. What else would NUFC be willing to settle for? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Just now, Scoot said: Settlement in the arbitration case would probably involve passing the deal. What else would NUFC be willing to settle for? Costs, lost of earnings etc. It's MA, if he smells money he'll be all over it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Even the biggest sceptic must realise Newcastle have been unfairly treated, the refusal of the takeover is just not fair Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Ashley is absolutely pulling every trick/tactic/test possible against the PL. If anyone seriously believes that PIF are not interested in buying the club then that's genuinely mental. The PL are legally getting pushed further and further into a corner in order to get this deal passed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
number9shirt Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 27 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Is the panel stacked against us? (Not having a dig, just not up to date.) That is the general consensus, also the club & NDM went to court to remove one of the panel members. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 30 minutes ago, number9shirt said: That is the general consensus, also the club & NDM went to court to remove one of the panel members. And lost the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magpie Posted May 6, 2021 Share Posted May 6, 2021 Are we absolutely certain the disclosure stage will unearth documentation that will prove collusion and corruption? Do we know for a fact that that has actually happened? Or is it just an assumption given the fact the takeover was never rubber stamped for reason unbeknown to any of us? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now