Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Did we not do similar for Ritchie? It wasn't a secret that he had regressed massively, but he was kept around for 12-18 months. I see no problem with Wilson staying, as long as we still sign some sort of striker.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wilson was getting on ahead of Osula which we could all see wasn’t the right decision. My worry, even with a pay as you play type deal is that would still be the case. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
2 minutes ago, Paully said:

He’s appeared more for channel 5 than us this season!

DAZN, Channel 5 just take their feed.

Nice to see Shay there, I really wish there was a full-time role for him here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 18/06/2025 at 19:19, Stifler said:

DAZN, Channel 5 just take their feed.

Nice to see Shay there, I really wish there was a full-time role for him here.

Quite liking the unpaid ambassador advocate role he does anyway. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Fenham Mag said:

He is on the premier league released list so I guess that's it. 

 

As is Ruddy.

Would hope the club communicates it either way

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Fenham Mag said:

He is on the premier league released list so I guess that's it. 

 

As is Ruddy.

He was released/out of contract but offered a contract. They said as much in their released statement. Wouldn’t read too much in to that 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its more than time we started letting players go when they cant offer anything useful on the pitch...this "good in the dressing room' is a total small club mentality which we should be looking to be rid of

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gjohnson said:

Its more than time we started letting players go when they cant offer anything useful on the pitch...this "good in the dressing room' is a total small club mentality which we should be looking to be rid of


It’s difficult to be too critical of the club’s cultivation of player engagement behind the scenes given the season we’ve just had but I tend to agree 100% with this. I know Man U kept players past their sell by date under Ferguson but they weren’t players for key positions, were usually ‘fill a gap’ sorts and could meaningfully participate at least. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, gdm said:

He was released/out of contract but offered a contract. They said as much in their released statement. Wouldn’t read too much in to that 

 

I'm not sure it's clear what the contract offer was TBH. Could have just been a discussion about his future out of respect for what he's done for us.

 

I hope it wasn't that we really wanted to keep him because we think he's really valuable. We'd have to be very thick to believe that. 

 

 

Edited by AyeDubbleYoo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...