Anderson Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 Aye, Sky still insistent re: Schar’s touch. Absolutely lunacy if that’s the case. Villa’s last week was dodgy, but Schar only plays that ball because Watkin’s is behind him. Would be furious if I cared about us getting a result. As it stands, furious as it’s Bruce’s excuse served up on a platter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 If that fat cunt Ashley is watching this he surely has to see the players aren't playing for Bruce anymore. You've answered your own question. He won't be. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 I like the way Redknapp and Bent kept bigging up Bruce at the start of the game and now they are both as quiet as mice about Newcastle at half time. Not one mention from anyone in the studio about how terrible we have been. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 Should add that the offside law is a complete shambles I don't think there's anything dodgy about the fact you're onside if you're behind the ball. If two players are through, they shouldn't be able to pass? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 We've been shite but that offside decision is atrocious for the first goal Why? They didn't look at it because Schar touched it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candi_Hills Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 We're losing this game anyway so I hope they absolutely pump us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 Should add that the offside law is a complete shambles I don't think there's anything dodgy about the fact you're onside if you're behind the ball. If two players are through, they shouldn't be able to pass? He means the defender playing the ball making everyone onside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 :lol: :lol: Kinell Bahahahaha. Absolutely gone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armchair Pundit Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 This run has been coming since the start of last season. His luck has finally ran out. We are getting what we have deserved for months now. Always had to happen as soon as the tactics Rafa had drilled in to the team wore off and Bruce started making his own mark, you can only hide on someone else's work for so long before you get caught out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 Should add that the offside law is a complete shambles I don't think there's anything dodgy about the fact you're onside if you're behind the ball. If two players are through, they shouldn't be able to pass? It's because sky are focusing only on the fact schar touched it. I think they are looking at the wrong thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 We've been shite but that offside decision is atrocious for the first goal He was behind the ball wasn't he? If that's the case fair enough but they were saying on Sky it's because Schar touched the ball On NBC they said he's behind the goal almost straight away, it's just Sky getting into this Schar thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 We've been shite but that offside decision is atrocious for the first goal Why? They didn't look at it because Schar touched it Yeah, that's right. Schar leaves it Watkins naturally would put it in, no goal. Blame Schar for being thick 👍🏻 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 Should add that the offside law is a complete shambles I don't think there's anything dodgy about the fact you're onside if you're behind the ball. If two players are through, they shouldn't be able to pass? He means the defender playing the ball making everyone onside. If moving in position to score when offside, and being played onside because a defender played at the ball because said defender can't know if the attacker is offside for sure. How in gods name is that not gaining an advantage by being offside, the law is fucking ridiculous if that the case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 That sky commentator is fucking clueless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 I'd be very surprised if Sky are getting this wrong. She very purposefully explained the reason why it wasnt looked at. Because she''d been told exactly why it wasnt looked at I'd confidently imagine. Regardless of the if he was level or behind argument, Sky have just categorically said the offside rule has changed and it's now not offside when the ball is played. That's never been a thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 We've been shite but that offside decision is atrocious for the first goal Why? They didn't look at it because Schar touched it Yeah, that's right. Schar leaves it Watkins naturally would put it in, no goal. Blame Schar for being thick 👍🏻 Defenders can’t be expected to jump over dangerous crosses in case the attacker is offside. The law is ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bishops Finger Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 This run has been coming since the start of last season. His luck has finally ran out. We are getting what we have deserved for months now. We saw it coming months ago, yet the pundits still can't see it, and they call us deluded ffs Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 We've been shite but that offside decision is atrocious for the first goal Why? They didn't look at it because Schar touched it Yeah, that's right. Schar leaves it Watkins naturally would put it in, no goal. Blame Schar for being thick 👍🏻 What? Watkins was clearly behind the ball when it was played though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 We've been shite but that offside decision is atrocious for the first goal Why? They didn't look at it because Schar touched it Yeah, that's right. Schar leaves it Watkins naturally would put it in, no goal. Blame Schar for being thick 👍🏻 Schar can't know if Watkins is off or not, it's too tight to know ffs. It's utter madness to blame a player, the fucking law is complete bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEEJ Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 Should add that the offside law is a complete shambles Definitely. That scenario with Schar there basically forces him into making the decision to play the ball. If he leaves it for Watkins to tap in he has to be 100% certain he's offside. Ludicrous stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aiston Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 Wonder why VAR didn't check that Mings foul on Darlow. Darlow wins the ball and punches it away then get cleans out by Mings Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SAK Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 The most fucked up thing is they still wont sack the cabbage headed bastard. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 We've been s**** but that offside decision is atrocious for the first goal Why? They didn't look at it because Schar touched it Yeah, that's right. Schar leaves it Watkins naturally would put it in, no goal. Blame Schar for being thick 👍🏻 This is a fucking ridiculous take. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 We've been shite but that offside decision is atrocious for the first goal Why? They didn't look at it because Schar touched it Yeah, that's right. Schar leaves it Watkins naturally would put it in, no goal. Blame Schar for being thick 👍🏻 What? Watkins was clearly behind the ball when it was played though. Was he clearly behind the ball? Looked very close Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted January 23, 2021 Share Posted January 23, 2021 This run has been coming since the start of last season. His luck has finally ran out. We are getting what we have deserved for months now. We saw it coming months ago, yet the pundits still can't see it, and they call us deluded ffs It’s because he managed Sunderland though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now