Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

I assume many of you have taken the time to read the 9 page document. It's quite damning and an excellent read. Can only assume the legal team assisting MA have had a hand in providing evidence through case law examples, etc to the author of it.

 

Gracias Mimms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the one hand it would be hilarious beyond words if this was a desperate hail mary attempt. On the other hand I don't think they'd go all in if it didn't actually seem likely.

 

If Aaron Rodgers was hoying it up we'd be alright  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Mimms has been correct again?

the only people in denial about mimms at this point are penn and the luke edwards anime pillow he sleeps with.

 

 

I know he's an absolute freak and a fucking weirdo but why would he sleep with an anime pillow of himself?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Progress I mentioned is due to a different direction that the lawyers have explored/exploited.

 

O0

 

The good holes in De Marco’s bread were definitely loopholes like

 

Champion. Now we can get behind the kind of people that exploit loopholes that shouldn't exist. As well as the Saudi government.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mimms, Ando and Money Mike Ashley (yes, genuinely) are the three real ITKs here.

 

Someone might have pointed this out before but Money Mike Ashley follows only one on twitter; a PR agency called KBA (Keith Bishop Association). Under their clients they list both Newcastle United and Sports Direct: https://www.kbapr.com/clients/

 

:whistle:

 

In fact, a lot of the brands listed are owned by Mike Ashely (Frasers Group).

 

How I wish I was this far behind.

 

Imagine what he is going to be like when he finally gets to 2020...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Progress I mentioned is due to a different direction that the lawyers have explored/exploited.

 

O0

 

The good holes in De Marco’s bread were definitely loopholes like

I didn't think there was anything into his latest bread servings. Turns out, and reading back his captions, he did have something cryptic in it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Mimms has been correct again?

the only people in denial about mimms at this point are penn and the luke edwards anime pillow he sleeps with.

 

 

I know he's an absolute freak and a fucking weirdo but why would he sleep with an anime pillow of himself?

 

To quote an old maxim, "the Penn is shitier than the board"

 

 

And given how shite the board actually is, that's some going.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t understand the meaning of all this.

It’s not Ashley and the consortiums legal challenge as it doesn’t include the lawyers they are using, yet it is a unnamed group of supporters who are making this challenge which has been applauded and possibly approved by Ashley and the consortium and may contain them within this group.

So it’s not their legal challenge, but it is their legal challenge, and it may not be a legal challenge but a way to put pressure on the Premier League.

However in the background their own legal challenge is going ahead bit so are constructive talks with the Premier League.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t understand the meaning of all this.

It’s not Ashley and the consortiums legal challenge as it doesn’t include the lawyers they are using, yet it is a unnamed group of supporters who are making this challenge which has been applauded and possibly approved by Ashley and the consortium and may contain them within this group.

So it’s not their legal challenge, but it is their legal challenge, and it may not be a legal challenge but a way to put pressure on the Premier League.

However in the background their own legal challenge is going ahead bit so are constructive talks with the Premier League.

 

It’s all coordinated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t understand the meaning of all this.

It’s not Ashley and the consortiums legal challenge as it doesn’t include the lawyers they are using, yet it is a unnamed group of supporters who are making this challenge which has been applauded and possibly approved by Ashley and the consortium and may contain them within this group.

So it’s not their legal challenge, but it is their legal challenge, and it may not be a legal challenge but a way to put pressure on the Premier League.

However in the background their own legal challenge is going ahead bit so are constructive talks with the Premier League.

 

You sum it up perfectly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don’t understand the meaning of all this.

It’s not Ashley and the consortiums legal challenge as it doesn’t include the lawyers they are using, yet it is a unnamed group of supporters who are making this challenge which has been applauded and possibly approved by Ashley and the consortium and may contain them within this group.

So it’s not their legal challenge, but it is their legal challenge, and it may not be a legal challenge but a way to put pressure on the Premier League.

However in the background their own legal challenge is going ahead bit so are constructive talks with the Premier League.

 

You sum it up perfectly.

 

I dont know what it all means but its providing more interest and excitement than Brucie ball has ever done!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...