Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

I would take a defeat tonight if it meant Bruce goes. I genuinely can't see it happening though (Bruce going that is, I can definitely see us losing).

 

Is the suggestion from Mimms that Bruce is going if the takeover is completed or is it that he's on his way out regardless?

 

That is the question. I find it hard to believe he goes without the takeover at this point, which would suggest a double cause of celebration.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take a defeat tonight if it meant Bruce goes. I genuinely can't see it happening though (Bruce going that is, I can definitely see us losing).

 

Is the suggestion from Mimms that Bruce is going if the takeover is completed or is it that he's on his way out regardless?

 

Makes 0 sense to sack Bruce and be no takeover.  Obviously makes sense to a real football team without Mike in charge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take a defeat tonight if it meant Bruce goes. I genuinely can't see it happening though (Bruce going that is, I can definitely see us losing).

 

Is the suggestion from Mimms that Bruce is going if the takeover is completed or is it that he's on his way out regardless?

 

That is the question. I find it hard to believe he goes without the takeover at this point, which would suggest a double cause of celebration.

 

So if its takeover related and if the takeover is about to go through, why exactly would Ashley sack him? It wouldn't be his problem anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have to remember the context that the media laid into Bruce this week, called him the Trump of football managers and he even had to respond to this in the press conference. I thin even without a takeover that would make Ashley twitchy after what happened with Schteve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also Bruce was supposedly told this week that there was no transfer budget.

 

Either we just told him that as he’s getting the boot and didn’t want to waste time entertaining his targets, or the club can’t afford transfers in which case need to consider whether another manager can eke out better performances

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has let his love for Bruce get the better of him this afternoon :lol:

I don't usually respond to the harrowing personal abuse I suffer on here for daring to post the occasional contrary view, but I have to draw the line at any suggestion I support Bruce.

No. I already know the answer.

Feel free to share with the forum!

The information was given to a person in confidence. That confidence was misguided, as they've obviously sent you that information.

 

Well done IMTTS for outing them though, whoever they are. If it wasn't for you, mimms might never have known what an untrustworthy knobhead they were :clap:

 

The fact that there are people out there DMing Mimms is so fucking :anguish:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Has let his love for Bruce get the better of him this afternoon :lol:

I don't usually respond to the harrowing personal abuse I suffer on here for daring to post the occasional contrary view, but I have to draw the line at any suggestion I support Bruce.

No. I already know the answer.

Feel free to share with the forum!

The information was given to a person in confidence. That confidence was misguided, as they've obviously sent you that information.

 

Well done IMTTS for outing them though, whoever they are. If it wasn't for you, mimms might never have known what an untrustworthy knobhead they were :clap:

 

The fact that there are people out there DMing Mimms is so fucking :anguish:

 

The impression I got, given IMTTS used a phrase that wasn't written on here, is that this has happened outside of here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would take a defeat tonight if it meant Bruce goes. I genuinely can't see it happening though (Bruce going that is, I can definitely see us losing).

 

Is the suggestion from Mimms that Bruce is going if the takeover is completed or is it that he's on his way out regardless?

 

That is the question. I find it hard to believe he goes without the takeover at this point, which would suggest a double cause of celebration.

 

So if its takeover related and if the takeover is about to go through, why exactly would Ashley sack him? It wouldn't be his problem anymore.

 

I’m just guessing on this I really haven’t got a clue. Never thought Ashley would sack him currently looking at league position, therefore I’m guessing either takeover is imminent and new owners are going to sack him, or more likely they’re seriously worried he’s taking us down and have instructed Ashley to get rid as not to jeopardise deal.

 

Who the f*** knows though.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mimms hinted that someone has been told to leave.

 

Penn subsequently disclosed that Mimms PM’d someone who PM’d Penn for some bizarre reason (some real losers here). The implication is that PIf have told Ashley to sack Bruce

Link to post
Share on other sites

Penn subsequently disclosed that Mimms PM’d someone who PM’d Penn for some bizarre reason (some real losers here). The implication is that PIf have told Ashley to sack Bruce

That's absolutely not what happened :lol:

 

My understanding is that outside of this forum, Mimms passed some information to someone, who has subsequently thrown that trust in his face and passed it on to IMTTS.

IMTTS used a phrase on here that Mimms hadn't posted on the open forum meaning that they had been told this information elsewhere.

 

Might be wrong, like :lol:

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Penn subsequently disclosed that Mimms PM’d someone who PM’d Penn for some bizarre reason (some real losers here). The implication is that PIf have told Ashley to sack Bruce

That's absolutely not what happened :lol:

 

I skipped the bit about Rocker for simplicity

Link to post
Share on other sites

So bruce isn’t getting sacked and this was just an elaborate trap to catch some sneaky forum poster. Wow.

 

No. That's not right. Daft cunt.

I’m a daft cunt. You’ll have to explain it a bit better, you monolithic headed cunt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...