Jackie Broon Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 What did the tweet from Ben Jacobs say? I missed it. That it was NCSL, not the PL, that had breached confidentiality by saying the club had an ongoing legal case with the PL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 He followed it up with this Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Didnt he leak it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_F Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 What a moron lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 He followed it up with this This still isn't right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 He did, he’s utterly screwed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candi_Hills Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 I'll tell you what, if this does go through, our games against Liverpool might be a bit spicy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Gotta admire them for sticking with it like. Could have easily said f*** it and moved on to something else. Like the Trust did. Really good news this, if only for the reason that it confirms it's not all over just yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 I'm lost, what are we accusing Ben Jacobs of? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 I'm lost, what are we accusing Ben Jacobs of? Being a dick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzz Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 I'm lost, what are we accusing Ben Jacobs of? Being the main recipient of PL leaks? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nbthree3 Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Deleting tweets is great mind. Always makes the problem go away. He knows he's fucked up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Massive positive the club have confirmed they’ve been taking action. And it's positive that they have confirmed it is arbitration rather than litigation. What's that mean? That it's probably about resolving differences to allow the takeover to go through rather than seeking damages over a failed takeover. Just what I want to hear. Brilliant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Ryder : "I've got nothing to add to the story" then "Five things we learned from the Premier League not returning my calls" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_F Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 I'm lost, what are we accusing Ben Jacobs of? Accusing NCSL of leaking a letter before they received it. Then deleting because it was it was actually him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wibble Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 I'm lost, what are we accusing Ben Jacobs of? Crimes against intelligence. Basically, Ben (erm...banned from the BBC for gross misconduct) Jacobs was proving just how far modern journalism has fallen. Claimed that NCSL had leaked the info that NUFC has started proceedings against PL. Just two things wrong with that: 1) Any confidentiality agreement will be between the PL and NUFC (think it's actually in the PL rules). The fact is, PL/their lawyers were the ones to breach that by mentioning it to NCSL. NCSL simply aren't bound by it. 2) NCSL say the letter they received was leaked (presume this was Ben's flurry of tweets the other day...) Anyway, Ben is just deflecting, somehow forgetting the amount of agenda-driven info he tweets from his PL source. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 I'm lost, what are we accusing Ben Jacobs of? I’m assuming leaking stuff from a PL source before the NSCL commented on the letter they got. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Zaius Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Are the PL able to reject arbitration? If not, how long would the process be likely to take, are we talking months or years here? Didnt they already offer independent arbitration that would have taken 2 years or so? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
IMTTS Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Is the Saudis involvement (or supposed lack of) been Sean/Penn/IMTTS's main bone of contention? It's as clear as day that they're still waiting in the wings, imo. No smoke without fire and there's a shitload of smoke. Why do you believe this is the case? I can't see any evidence whatsoever that the Saudis are still at the table. Ashley is pursuing a restraint of trade case against the Premier League, and arbitration is a precursor he has to indulge before going to court. None of this either requires or suggests the involvement of the Saudis. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Too ittle too late I reckon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Is the Saudis involvement (or supposed lack of) been Sean/Penn/IMTTS's main bone of contention? It's as clear as day that they're still waiting in the wings, imo. No smoke without fire and there's a shitload of smoke. Why do you believe this is the case? I can't see any evidence whatsoever that the Saudis are still at the table. Ashley is pursuing a restraint of trade case against the Premier League, and arbitration is a precursor he has to indulge before going to court. None of this either requires or suggests the involvement of the Saudis. The takeover could go thru and this clown would still say they had walked away for good. Dunno why anyone takes notice of anything he posts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Is the Saudis involvement (or supposed lack of) been Sean/Penn/IMTTS's main bone of contention? It's as clear as day that they're still waiting in the wings, imo. No smoke without fire and there's a shitload of smoke. Why do you believe this is the case? I can't see any evidence whatsoever that the Saudis are still at the table. Ashley is pursuing a restraint of trade case against the Premier League, and arbitration is a precursor he has to indulge before going to court. None of this either requires or suggests the involvement of the Saudis. The Athletic claim they are as interested as ever if you want an actual source. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Is the Saudis involvement (or supposed lack of) been Sean/Penn/IMTTS's main bone of contention? It's as clear as day that they're still waiting in the wings, imo. No smoke without fire and there's a shitload of smoke. Why do you believe this is the case? I can't see any evidence whatsoever that the Saudis are still at the table. Ashley is pursuing a restraint of trade case against the Premier League, and arbitration is a precursor he has to indulge before going to court. None of this either requires or suggests the involvement of the Saudis. What happened to Mauriss? or redbird capital? Do you ever reply? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted November 19, 2020 Share Posted November 19, 2020 Is the Saudis involvement (or supposed lack of) been Sean/Penn/IMTTS's main bone of contention? It's as clear as day that they're still waiting in the wings, imo. No smoke without fire and there's a shitload of smoke. Why do you believe this is the case? I can't see any evidence whatsoever that the Saudis are still at the table. Ashley is pursuing a restraint of trade case against the Premier League, and arbitration is a precursor he has to indulge before going to court. None of this either requires or suggests the involvement of the Saudis. Genuine question. Why should we believe anything you say over what local journalists are saying. Genuinely, if you have information that proves your line of thinking, i'd like to hear it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts