bowlingcrofty Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 More from Mimms' bessie: Lots happening behind the scenes, moving rapidly. Confidence very high but not completed. Solicitors working but not necessarily on cases v PL... No idea what that means. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 More from Mimms' bessie: Lots happening behind the scenes, moving rapidly. Confidence very high but not completed. Solicitors working but not necessarily on cases v PL... No idea what that means. The confidence is always high with the buyers. I wish we can atleast know whether the PL have changed their stance on anything with these developments. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Maybe solicitors are working on a restructure of the deal or looking at an alternative way PIF can get on board ?♂️ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Awaymag Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 She’s a wad Proper! what's a wad? I'm guessing 'a smart looking lass, that you defintiely 'Wad' (or would)'. And yes, she is. Ah, gotcha, takes on a whole new meaning does the group showaddywaddy in that case Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Probably just baking more bread Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Find it strange how Mimms said Liam Kennedy has a very good source and is worth listening too, along with the NCSL are just a side show to keep the main consortium out of the media. Yet Liam Kennedy literally brings news up from last year (and has regular big stories about what's going on) and makes out its breaking news, all bringing the consortium back into the media spotlight. That just doesn't add up. I think the only news/ leaks that matter are how the PL are viewing everything. Are they willing to negotiate or are they still not wanting this to happen under no uncertain terms. That is crucial info that as far as I know nobody has had any "reliable" info on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Find it strange how Mimms said Liam Kennedy has a very good source and is worth listening too, along with the NCSL are just a side show to keep the main consortium out of the media. Yet Liam Kennedy literally brings news up from last year (and has regular big stories about what's going on) and makes out its breaking news, all bringing the consortium back into the media spotlight. That just doesn't add up. I think the only news/ leaks that matter are how the PL are viewing everything. Are they willing to negotiate or are they still not wanting this to happen under no uncertain terms. That is crucial info that as far as I know nobody has had any "reliable" info on. I hope that there is zero negotiation and we take them for everything they have. It should either be a yes or no, not a negotiation. The fuckers have said no, seemingly purely down to greed, corruption, and influences which shouldn’t be allowed or permitted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Find it strange how Mimms said Liam Kennedy has a very good source and is worth listening too, along with the NCSL are just a side show to keep the main consortium out of the media. Yet Liam Kennedy literally brings news up from last year (and has regular big stories about what's going on) and makes out its breaking news, all bringing the consortium back into the media spotlight. That just doesn't add up. I think the only news/ leaks that matter are how the PL are viewing everything. Are they willing to negotiate or are they still not wanting this to happen under no uncertain terms. That is crucial info that as far as I know nobody has had any "reliable" info on. I hope that there is zero negotiation and we take them for everything they have. It should either be a yes or no, not a negotiation. The fuckers have said no, seemingly purely down to greed, corruption, and influences which shouldn’t be allowed or permitted. They haven't said no, and that's all conjecture. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Find it strange how Mimms said Liam Kennedy has a very good source and is worth listening too, along with the NCSL are just a side show to keep the main consortium out of the media. Yet Liam Kennedy literally brings news up from last year (and has regular big stories about what's going on) and makes out its breaking news, all bringing the consortium back into the media spotlight. That just doesn't add up. I think the only news/ leaks that matter are how the PL are viewing everything. Are they willing to negotiate or are they still not wanting this to happen under no uncertain terms. That is crucial info that as far as I know nobody has had any "reliable" info on. I hope that there is zero negotiation and we take them for everything they have. It should either be a yes or no, not a negotiation. The fuckers have said no, seemingly purely down to greed, corruption, and influences which shouldn’t be allowed or permitted. They haven't said no, and that's all conjecture. An indefinite wait is the same as saying no, in my view. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlito Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Didn't it come out that the bid was officially rejected a while after PIF withdrew? I thought I saw that somewhere a few months back but I could have simply misread something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Nope. Well, it did say so in our statement I think? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Didn't it come out that the bid was officially rejected a while after PIF withdrew? I thought I saw that somewhere a few months back but I could have simply misread something. Ashley said it was rejected in his statement. The PL/masters said it wasn’t Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Sick of hearing how confident the buyers are. They'd say the glass is half-full when its empty. Burnt too many times. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carlito Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Nope. Well, it did say so in our statement I think? Didn't it come out that the bid was officially rejected a while after PIF withdrew? I thought I saw that somewhere a few months back but I could have simply misread something. Ashley said it was rejected in his statement. The PL/masters said it wasn’t Ah, that's right. Ashley said it was and the PL said otherwise Pot and kettle with those 2 mind Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sean Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Sick of hearing how confident the buyers are. They'd say the glass is half-full when its empty. Burnt too many times. This, basically. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Sick of hearing how confident the buyers are. They'd say the glass is half-full when its empty. Burnt too many times. This, basically. LOL....please remind me when you’ve EVER been confident, and subsequently burnt! From day one, you’ve been a grey cloud over the whole thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Couple of interesting bits in this if you can get past Starforth’s drab voice. From 13 minutes onwards. Seller positive about this weeks developments in Middle East. Arbitration panel still not chosen, sounds like games at play and big concern FA chooses 3rd member. Possibly most interesting, Kennedy has seen documents that show after PIF walked the o&d test has been changed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thorpinho Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 In what way was the o&d test changed? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 In what way was the o&d test changed? He doesn’t explain what’s changed, just that he’s seen documentation that shows it has. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 In what way was the o&d test changed? Question 1) - Are you looking to buy Newcastle United ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 In what way was the o&d test changed? Question 1) - Are you looking to buy Newcastle United ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Collage Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 In what way was the o&d test changed? Question 1) - Are you looking to buy Newcastle United ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 If true that the O&D test has changed,then I'm sorry but that's really really bad news for us. I always thought it would change but as our takeover started under the old test, then that would be applied. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sho Time Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 If true that the O&D test has changed,then I'm sorry but that's really really bad news for us. I always thought it would change but as our takeover started under the old test, then that would be applied. Not necessarily. I'm only speculating here but the reportings of PIF leaving the table were only ever reportings. The conversations have clearly still be ongoing related to this deal rather than another one in the offing. If the PL were to introduce changes to the test, they could not be enforced within the deal from last year, they could (surely) only be for any future dealings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted January 7, 2021 Share Posted January 7, 2021 Kennedy will just add a few extra lines to the document regardless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts