Jackie Broon Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 3 minutes ago, Rocker said: From 'Loaded Mag' podcast on Youtube. That's a big change in position from him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Just now, Jackie Broon said: That's a big change in position from him. Yeah, I know for sure he has a source within the PL, so here's hoping. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Just now, Jackie Broon said: That's a big change in position from him. Aye, he seems to be suddenly favouring the takeover going through if I'm reading it right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danh1 Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Aye those quotes from Jacobs are definitely positive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Complete turnabout that like, i don't want to get too positive though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Backpedal.gif That's a mighty U-turn from Bein Jacobs, sounds promising. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 If you watch the entire thing he's not quite as positive with the rest of his thoughts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Thats how he reels suckers in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 (edited) The fact that he starts out taking about "separate" and "different" and doesn't give any reason why the definitions of "director" and "control" would or wouldn't wrap in the KSA is a pretty clear indication that his understanding is superficial at best. That's not to say he may not ultimately turn out to be right -- but that would be more down to happenstance than him actually knowing how the legal analysis by the arbitrators is likely to turn out. (To be clear, I'm not trying to suggest I do, either. ) Edited July 14, 2021 by B-more Mag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 7 minutes ago, Shearergol said: If you watch the entire thing he's not quite as positive with the rest of his thoughts. So in other words he covers all bases as he's done from the very start. No change there then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 He'll be reeling a few in... Then back pedalling again soon. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Glad a few on here still see right through him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 (edited) 53 minutes ago, Shearergol said: If you watch the entire thing he's not quite as positive with the rest of his thoughts. What an infinitely better podcast. I mean, I wouldn't listen to it( regularly), but it isn't a gaggle of cunts flogging tacky merch and talking utter shite. Edited July 14, 2021 by Rocker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 Still listening to the podcast, and Jacobs thinks the arbitration hearing will 99% be a private one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manorpark Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 9 minutes ago, Rocker said: Still listening to the podcast, and Jacobs thinks the arbitration hearing will 99% be a private one. Yes, we have made (and are still making) a truly valiant attempt to make it public, but the EPL have so much to hide, there was always very little chance of that happening. Their refusal to agree with everyone else though, will have confirmed, in many peoples eyes, what most of us always thought about the EPLs need for secrecy. The CAT case will bring it all out, it will just come cascading out . . . and please can the usual susupects try not to ask me how I "know" that !!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 (edited) 1 hour ago, Shearergol said: If you watch the entire thing he's not quite as positive with the rest of his thoughts. I mean, I'm an hour in and he's still not overly negative at all. At the hour mark, he's asked how he think it will play out and he says 'we have a strong chance'. Twice actually, as the O&D test isn't robust enough. Edited July 14, 2021 by Rocker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 (edited) Maybe a dumb question, but can the whole findings/ruling/case of of the CAT case not be FOIA requested? Edited July 14, 2021 by HTT II Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 (edited) 3 minutes ago, HTT II said: Maybe a dumb question, but can the whole findings/ruling/case of of the CAT case not be FOIA requested? It'll all be in public anyway, that one. You'll be able to watch it. Edited July 14, 2021 by Rocker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Linton Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 4 hours ago, Pokerprince2004 said: Oliver Dowdon talks about the takeover (about 1:22 into video). Disappointed by his reply As expected really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 8 hours ago, Lazarus said: Wasnt Aimar linked - or am i thinking of another Argie playmaker.... Aimar & Saviola the same summer we got Coloccini & Jonas I can definitely remember. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 2 hours ago, Jackie Broon said: That's a big change in position from him. Yeah that’s a massive u-turn. What gives? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andyc35i Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 2 hours ago, Jackie Broon said: That's a big change in position from him. I still don’t get why we have to prove anything. They have told you who is going to be owning and controlling the club, so do the test on the information in front of you! What gives them the right to say we think you’re lying to us and the owners are different to what has been shared, I just don’t get it Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 1 minute ago, andyc35i said: I still don’t get why we have to prove anything. They have told you who is going to be owning and controlling the club, so do the test on the information in front of you! What gives them the right to say we think you’re lying to us and the owners are different to what has been shared, I just don’t get it Unfortunately the PL's rules give them that right, the definition of 'control' in the PL's rules is very broad and, unlike the legal definition of a shadow director, can include people who have the potential to control the club whether or not they will actually act on that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 3 hours ago, B-more Mag said: The fact that he starts out taking about "separate" and "different" and doesn't give any reason why the definitions of "director" and "control" would or wouldn't wrap in the KSA is a pretty clear indication that his understanding is superficial at best. That's not to say he may not ultimately turn out to be right -- but that would be more down to happenstance than him actually knowing how the legal analysis by the arbitrators is likely to turn out. (To be clear, I'm not trying to suggest I do, either. ) He says he's talking about what he's been told from sources on both sides, so he doesn't need to understand the specifics as long as the sources do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
B-more Mag Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 14 minutes ago, Teasy said: He says he's talking about what he's been told from sources on both sides, so he doesn't need to understand the specifics as long as the sources do. Then I don't have any confidence his sources have an understanding that's anything more than superficial. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now