The Butcher Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 I love the smell of corruption in the evening. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 You would have thought proving PIF are influenced by MBS would have been a slam dunk, but it wasn’t, proving some company or tourism project isn’t directly linked/related to PIF would be even more difficult. The temporary ban is also an obstruction of free trade etc.. none of this would have a leg to stand on in court. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 Blocking free trade under a Tory government, aye that will work out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 26 minutes ago, The Butcher said: They need to hit them with legal action and now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 26 minutes ago, The Butcher said: Time to dust off De Marco, because fuck this corrupt shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 Absolutely embarrassing how rattled this lot are about the prospect of anyone beginning to think about challenging their dominance at the top of the tree, it's pathetic. Fully expect the next move to delay it even further until after the window has closed in February. I'd be tempted to make the deals, sign the players, spend the cash and take it to court and let the lawyers pull it apart there. How is anyone allowed to compete without an injection of cash? They're essentially preventing competition and threat to their position. And that's before you even consider the fact the same cunts blocking this are the same fuckers who signed contracts to leave the very League they're now so desperate to protect about 7 months ago. They're a pack of fucking snakes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 (edited) 7 minutes ago, midds said: Absolutely embarrassing how rattled this lot are about the prospect of anyone beginning to think about challenging their dominance at the top of the tree, it's pathetic. Fully expect the next move to delay it even further until after the window has closed in February. I'd be tempted to make the deals, sign the players, spend the cash and take it to court and let the lawyers pull it apart there. How is anyone allowed to compete without an injection of cash? They're essentially preventing competition and threat to their position. And that's before you even consider the fact the same cunts blocking this are the same fuckers who signed contracts to leave the very League they're now so desperate to protect about 7 months ago. They're a pack of fucking snakes. We can spend £200m without any new sponsorship deals, new deals would allow us to spend even more, owners can inject cash without sponsorship and as long as we don’t lose more than £105m in a rolling 3 year period we’re fine Edited November 26, 2021 by nufcnick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 There’s nowt in this, but I like the use of “uncovered”. Bird used to be a Labour councillor. Are we meant to believe there was some investigative journalism behind this rather than Nick Forbes just gan “aye, here’s what wa said…” Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 8 minutes ago, nufcnick said: We can spend £200m without any new sponsorship deals, new deals would allow us to spend even more, owners can inject cash without sponsorship and as long as we don’t lose more than £105m in a rolling 3 year period we’re fine Yeah we can, but the fact we are not being allowed to increase our revenue through commercial/sponsorship deals is totally anti-competitive and a restraint of trade. This needs to have legal action enforced as it's just totally wrong. It would be thrown straight out of court. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 3 minutes ago, WarrenBartonCentrePartin said: There’s nowt in this, but I like the use of “uncovered”. Bird used to be a Labour councillor. Are we meant to believe there was some investigative journalism behind this rather than Nick Forbes just gan “aye, here’s what wa said…” Nothing to see here folks, move along! Dramatic headline click bait sheeeeeiiiiiit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 3 minutes ago, et tu brute said: Yeah we can, but the fact we are not being allowed to increase our revenue through commercial/sponsorship deals is totally anti-competitive and a restraint of trade. This needs to have legal action enforced as it's just totally wrong. It would be thrown straight out of court. Surely that's the next step, legal action from us. They can't prevent sponsors from sponsoring us until they make up new rules. We HAVE to be taking legal advice on this, surely? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcnick Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 3 minutes ago, et tu brute said: Yeah we can, but the fact we are not being allowed to increase our revenue through commercial/sponsorship deals is totally anti-competitive and a restraint of trade. This needs to have legal action enforced as it's just totally wrong. It would be thrown straight out of court. Your not going to get any argument from me, I would just do the sponsorship and let the court deal with it as you said, I was just pointing out it has no affect on what we can spend in jan and would have no effect on our transfer business if they did drag it out until February Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 It’s easy to delay stuff when you are a cartel with no oversight isn’t it.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 (edited) I suspect where trying to build bridges and remain cordial at the minute with this. However, I’ve got no doubt if they’re going to try and screw us this will end up in the courts. With the govt looking closely at governance though they’ll come to an agreement to suit all, I’ve got no doubt. Edited November 26, 2021 by Whitley mag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 1 hour ago, WarrenBartonCentrePartin said: There’s nowt in this, but I like the use of “uncovered”. Bird used to be a Labour councillor. Are we meant to believe there was some investigative journalism behind this rather than Nick Forbes just gan “aye, here’s what wa said…” Simon Bird, you’re a cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 2 hours ago, The Butcher said: I hope we spend trillions now just to annoy the rest of the PL Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted November 26, 2021 Share Posted November 26, 2021 41 minutes ago, duo said: I hope we spend trillions now just to annoy the rest of the PL Most of that would be the Reuben's regenerating the Metro you'd imagine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 27, 2021 Share Posted November 27, 2021 1 hour ago, The Prophet said: Most of that would be the Reuben's regenerating the Metro you'd imagine. Man check out this callback to a decade ago! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 27, 2021 Share Posted November 27, 2021 4 hours ago, The Butcher said: I'd understand this more, and maybe agree with it, if several other clubs weren't already sponsored by firms that have Saudi and/or Qatar based money invested in them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mighty__mag Posted November 27, 2021 Share Posted November 27, 2021 5 hours ago, et tu brute said: Yeah we can, but the fact we are not being allowed to increase our revenue through commercial/sponsorship deals is totally anti-competitive and a restraint of trade. This needs to have legal action enforced as it's just totally wrong. It would be thrown straight out of court. Most definitely will be challenged. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted November 27, 2021 Share Posted November 27, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 Interesting… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiago Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 Simon Bird is such a twat. I was so disappointed to see him invited to the True Faith talkin. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted November 28, 2021 Share Posted November 28, 2021 1 hour ago, Thiago said: Simon Bird is such a twat. I was so disappointed to see him invited to the True Faith talkin. Twats invite twat don’t be to disappointed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now