Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Anyone else really curious as to how the Matt Targett in the deep Bruno midfield role experiment would have turned out. ?

 

Was the most unexpected performance looking at the line up but it just proves why he is levels above the likes of Ten Hag. He makes perceived shit players look good and functional. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Easiest sub to make when Targett has to come off is to bring on Burn and have Hall play midfield (might have been the plan anyway tbh, even though in the first minute Hall was LB). Puts Miggy on instead who goes on and score, plays a big part in the second goal and could have got an assist for Wilson.

Such brilliant management from Eddie there, when 2 minutes into the game he had to change the game plan.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, alexf said:

Anyone else really curious as to how the Matt Targett in the deep Bruno midfield role experiment would have turned out. ?

 

Was the most unexpected performance looking at the line up but it just proves why he is levels above the likes of Ten Hag. He makes perceived shit players look good and functional. 


Targett was at LB and Hall was in midfield for what it’s worth. 
 

The change brought on Miggy at LM and moved Hall back. 

 

 

Edited by cubaricho

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, cubaricho said:


Targett was at LB and Hall was in midfield for what it’s worth. 
 

The change brought on Miggy at LM and moved Hall back. 

 

 

 

 

Eddies interview he says they were looking to play Targett in midfield, and on the highlights you can see Targett playing as a DM. Assuming they would have swapped around quite a bit anyways. Miggy at LM worked really well as we simply overloaded them with Joe W, Hall and Miggy down that side. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Adam said:

 

Eddies interview he says they were looking to play Targett in midfield, and on the highlights you can see Targett playing as a DM. Assuming they would have swapped around quite a bit anyways. Miggy at LM worked really well as we simply overloaded them with Joe W, Hall and Miggy down that side. 

Aye, was great to see how there was always an extra man down our left hand side. Obviously Howe knows about Ritchies limitations, so preferred us attacking as far away from him as possible too :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely love the guy. Tactical genius. Extraordinary work ethic. Superb man-management.  Handles press conferences with class, modesty, intelligence and a nice sense of humour. Inspires confidence all round. A perfect match for the club. We're lucky to have him (and he's lucky to have us.) Hope he has a tenure comparable to Wenger and Ferguson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just been nice seeing players like Krafth, Ritchie and Dummett have "their moment" even though domestic cup games are probably all they'll see for us. Might suit us playing the bigger clubs with these line-ups where we're starting the games with a more solid system, these players are stepping up above their normal level and the opposition are thinking they'll piss it, rather than someone like Everton or West Ham who'd take it as a sign to go all out at us as it's a chance to knock us out. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think it was @Wullie who pointed out once that sometimes a manger just suits a club at a certain time. 

Think the example was Brendan Rodgers. I know he gets flack but he’s had some good teams and his Swansea weren’t bad at all considering the budget. His previous spell was a bit of a car crash at Reading. He obviously went on to some very very good teams after Swansea.

EH did exceptionally well at Bournemouth but not so much at Burnley. It would be hard to predict how well he end up doing here.

As much as it might him……it could also be the present incarnation of the club. The owners and the new ethos, the fan’s enthusiasm post takeover. Could just be a great match. Long may it continue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So in one game he's found extra cover at CB (Krafth) an option in Brunos position (Joelinton) and someone who can do a decent job up front (Gordon). Fully expecting Richie to go in goal or some shit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, cubaricho said:


Targett was at LB and Hall was in midfield for what it’s worth. 
 

The change brought on Miggy at LM and moved Hall back. 

 

 

 

 

That would have been the logical selection (and some score apps have it that way) but I don't think it actually was. Targett was definitely in CM when we kicked off with Hall at LB.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ponsaelius said:

 

That would have been the logical selection (and some score apps have it that way) but I don't think it actually was. Targett was definitely in CM when we kicked off with Hall at LB.

Eddie said in his post match that they where using the game as an experiment to see if Targett could play as a DM, so that if needed he could play the position in the Premier League if utterly desperate.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, cubaricho said:


Targett was at LB and Hall was in midfield for what it’s worth. 
 

The change brought on Miggy at LM and moved Hall back. 

 

 

 

Come on then, apologise for being wrong. [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ponsaelius said:

 

That would have been the logical selection (and some score apps have it that way) but I don't think it actually was. Targett was definitely in CM when we kicked off with Hall at LB.


Interesting, I didn’t see him there in the 90-odd seconds he was on the pitch. He literally came up from LB to make that challenge that injured him did he not? 
 

Hall has precedent playing LM too, and the pre-match lineups that were shown all had Targett at LB and Hall in midfield.

 

 

Edited by cubaricho

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who’s that knacker asking about tattoos man, Andy Sixsmith? An opportunity to ask some questions and get some insight and this kind of shit is still being asked of Eddie.  Do these journalists just see this as a bit of a laugh 

 

 

Edited by Andy84

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Andy84 said:

Who’s that knacker asking about tattoos man, Andy Sixsmith? An opportunity to ask some questions and get some insight and this kind of shit is still being asked of Eddie.  Do these journalists just see this as a bit of a laugh 

 

 

 


I honestly don’t know why most of them bother going. You could watch the YouTube video and write the same stories. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...