Bruno Guimarães

[Paulinho]

I really think he’d fail miserably at Arsenal or City. Just not quite technically good enough (and chronically immobile). A Premier League team with Champions League ambitions (i.e. us) or somewhere like PSG is his level. 

[KaKa]

1 minute ago, Paulinho said:

I really think he’d fail miserably at Arsenal or City. Just not quite technically good enough (and chronically immobile). A Premier League team with Champions League ambitions (i.e. us) or somewhere like PSG is his level. 

 

Bruno not good enough technically?! No chance.

 

As far as mobility goes Arsenal were playing Jorginho most of last season and he is slower, weaker and less physical than Bruno.

[gbandit]

Not good enough technically? Wow, I’ve heard it all now. There’s a reason he’s wanted by all the biggest clubs in the world 

[Ikon]

11 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

I really think he’d fail miserably at Arsenal or City. Just not quite technically good enough (and chronically immobile). A Premier League team with Champions League ambitions (i.e. us) or somewhere like PSG is his level. 

Not good enough technically….   I don’t find it hard to admit our players weaknesses but this definitely ain’t one of them when it comes to Bruno. Technically he is world class, 100% undeniable. 

[Choppy Chop Chop]

19 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

I really think he’d fail miserably at Arsenal or City. Just not quite technically good enough (and chronically immobile). A Premier League team with Champions League ambitions (i.e. us) or somewhere like PSG is his level. 

Good grief,  have a break 

[Big River]

maybe he just means his technique is a bit... unorthodox? on the eye, you can't deny he's a bit clunky. but he is effective. so it's not really a fair criticism as it's a stylistic thing.

 

he's no Viduka, put it that way.

[Elliottman]

31 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

I really think he’d fail miserably at Arsenal or City. Just not quite technically good enough (and chronically immobile). A Premier League team with Champions League ambitions (i.e. us) or somewhere like PSG is his level. 

wtf man ?

 

You’d think he was an absolute clogger based on this description dear me. 

[Paulinho]

No, what I mean is he’s not good enough technically. Not a good enough passer, - either short or long range - can’t beat a man, can’t take set pieces, can’t shoot with any conviction and has shown an almost complete inability to impose himself upon the midfields of the best teams. Good player, not great, and will be more Nunes than Rodri at City.

[The Prophet]

33 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

I really think he’d fail miserably at Arsenal or City. Just not quite technically good enough (and chronically immobile). A Premier League team with Champions League ambitions (i.e. us) or somewhere like PSG is his level. 

 

He's technically very good like.

[Beth]

If he goes it'll be to PSG, ticks all boxes. Played in France before, in the CL and would double his wage.

[nemtizz]

10 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

No, what I mean is he’s not good enough technically. Not a good enough passer, - either short or long range - can’t beat a man, can’t take set pieces, can’t shoot with any conviction and has shown an almost complete inability to impose himself upon the midfields of the best teams. Good player, not great, and will be more Nunes than Rodri at City.

 

Agreed until 'can't beat a man'. Absurd take.

 

 

Edited May 18, 2024 by nemtizz

[huss9]

his dad will make him stay.

loves a pint in the toon with his mates.

[KaKa]

6 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

No, what I mean is he’s not good enough technically. Not a good enough passer, - either short or long range - can’t beat a man, can’t take set pieces, can’t shoot with any conviction and has shown an almost complete inability to impose himself upon the midfields of the best teams. Good player, not great, and will be more Nunes than Rodri at City.

 

You are wrong in every single way, astonishingly enough.

 

This might not be the sport for you to follow, if you don't understand it to this extent.

 

My goodness.

[Tiresias]

He'd be an absolute perfect replacement for Gundogan at City whom I think has been missed there, was going to say realy badly missed but not like they've been doing badly...

 

Really hope he stays

[Guest]

49 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

I really think he’d fail miserably at Arsenal or City. Just not quite technically good enough (and chronically immobile). A Premier League team with Champions League ambitions (i.e. us) or somewhere like PSG is his level. 

Congrats on winning stinking take of the season

[Kimbo]

When it comes to technique, the only real problem Bruno has is some of the players around him.

[Skeletor]

23 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

No, what I mean is he’s not good enough technically. Not a good enough passer, - either short or long range - can’t beat a man, can’t take set pieces, can’t shoot with any conviction and has shown an almost complete inability to impose himself upon the midfields of the best teams. Good player, not great, and will be more Nunes than Rodri at City.

 

This is one hot (steamy pile of shit) take.

[nufc123]

34 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

No, what I mean is he’s not good enough technically. Not a good enough passer, - either short or long range - can’t beat a man, can’t take set pieces, can’t shoot with any conviction and has shown an almost complete inability to impose himself upon the midfields of the best teams. Good player, not great, and will be more Nunes than Rodri at City.

Well he was quite good against Spurs, Chelsea, Arsenal, Manu and Villa. Only City he didnt dominate or was very good. Few are as they are up against the best DM in the world. He also had some good/very good short and long passes in those games. He doesnt shoot with any conviction I will give you that..

 

 

Edited May 18, 2024 by nufc123

[BoSelecta]

Bruno not a good passer. Jesus wept. 

[Terrymac1966]

??

[Kanj]

59 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

No, what I mean is he’s not good enough technically. Not a good enough passer, - either short or long range - can’t beat a man, can’t take set pieces, can’t shoot with any conviction and has shown an almost complete inability to impose himself upon the midfields of the best teams. Good player, not great, and will be more Nunes than Rodri at City.

worst post ever. 

[1964]

If he does go to City Pep will need to coach that desire to hold the ball for just a bit too long.  He'll probably have more options for a pass but that's his only failing for me

[Fezzle]

4 hours ago, Fezzle said:

There's been some rank takes this week on here, seems to get worse each day. Rabiot FFS

Seems I hadnt even seen the worst post today FFS 

[TRon]

1 hour ago, Kimbo said:

When it comes to technique, the only real problem Bruno has is some of the players around him.

 

Was thinking exactly this in the game against Man U where the game sort of passed him by simply because no one was good enough to work the midfield along with him. Either they were stood passively watching, or passing it backwards to one of our defenders.

[nufcjb]

1 hour ago, Paulinho said:

No, what I mean is he’s not good enough technically. Not a good enough passer, - either short or long range - can’t beat a man, can’t take set pieces, can’t shoot with any conviction and has shown an almost complete inability to impose himself upon the midfields of the best teams. Good player, not great, and will be more Nunes than Rodri at City.

perma ban.