Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Norwich fan in peace, gave us a great game :smitten: we didn't really deserve it, no doubt you would have won if not for the events of the last 48 hours :smitten: because you're a MASSIVE club :smitten: much bigger than Newcastle :smitten:

 

And your fans :smitten:

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I find funny is that the muppets who constantly post on their NUFC thread, never post on any actual threads about their 'alleged' team. Exile, Skellington and jlaws being the main culprits, but there are a few more on that list also. I'm still convinced they are not actual Sunderland fans, but have taken advantage of a ready made audience to post their shit. 

 

 

Edited by et tu brute

Link to post
Share on other sites

Back on attendances again. 

And this is a raker - apparently only Wimbledon have had worse gates than us in the topflight.

they're insane.

having to go back to 1992* and 1978 and pick very selective examples - exceptions - proves the rule and counters the arguement they're trying to make

 

*still had comfortably bigger gates than them, but that's not the point

 

 

Edited by Wolfcastle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Whitley mag said:

Mind that Sabre Mag character on there surely can’t be one of us, deserves an absolute kicking if he is.

Screams failure in life if he’s trying to make chums with mackem heedbangers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Wolfcastle said:

Back on attendances again. 

And this is a raker - apparently only Wimbledon have had worse gates than us in the topflight.

they're insane.

having to go back to 1992 and 1978 and pick very selective examples - exceptions - actually proves the rule

 

We weren't in the top flight in 1992 the stupid cunts.

 

 

Edited by Scoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Wolfcastle said:

Back on attendances again. 

And this is a raker - apparently only Wimbledon have had worse gates than us in the topflight.

they're insane.

having to go back to 1992* and 1978 and pick very selective examples - exceptions - proves the rule and counters the arguement they're trying to make

 

*still had comfortably bigger gates than them, but that's not the point

 

 

 

 

If they're using a 7,000-odd attendance in 1978 as an example, what about their pre-1900 attendances? I doubt they ever got more than 7,000.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...