Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

Just now, The Prophet said:

 

Another source here. Says his club want above the €9 million exit clause and we're willing to go to €13/14 million.

I thought the point of a release clause is that the player can be released if the clause is met[emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, McCormick said:


How physical is he? Fast, strong etc.? Defensively?

 

Youtube suggests he’s pretty decent technically but I worry for our midfield without Joelinton’s power in there.

 

Hard to compare him.

 

Deep lying playmaker. Great technique and eye for a pass.

Good defensively, and awesome in tight spaces. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perrone and the Andrey Santos rumours almost seem too good to be true - stocking up on the best young South American CM talent.

 

Perrone, Santos, Kuol, Harrison Ashby + 1 marquee signing (Diaby/Maddison/Martin Terrier) and it'd be a very....interesting January.

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, arnonel said:

 

Hard to compare him.

 

Deep lying playmaker. Great technique and eye for a pass.

Good defensively, and awesome in tight spaces. 

 

Left footed DMs always look slick - Redondo, Mikky Merino

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Unbelievable said:

Perhaps we’re paying a bit extra for first dibs on some of their prospects or something?

 

Is it not because the release clause will be an upfront payment?

 

Where as we would rather pay more and make it a structured deal based on various things.

 

Our ability to spend money, seems entirely dependent on how we can spread payments out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, STM said:

 

Is it not because the release clause will be an upfront payment?

 

Where as we would rather pay more and make it a structured deal based on various things.

 

Our ability to spend money, seems entirely dependent on how we can spread payments out.

Aye, could be related to that too, although a 50% increase on the fee seems steep for a staged payment deal.

 

Edit: don’t think payment terms actually matters for FFP, since it’s all about amortisation isn’t it?

 

 

Edited by Unbelievable

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Emotic said:

I thought the point of a release clause is that the player can be released if the clause is met[emoji38]

Wasn’t there a PL transfer a few years back where a bid was made for a player (can’t recall who) but the player wasn’t released as the clause allowed negotiations if the sum was met but not immediate release? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, SAK said:

Wasn’t there a PL transfer a few years back where a bid was made for a player (can’t recall who) but the player wasn’t released as the clause allowed negotiations if the sum was met but not immediate release? 

Suarez from Liverpool to Arsenal in 2013- they bid £40m + £1 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's going to be an interesting window. We know we hold long standing interests in Maddison and Pedro and it seems we're lining up a number of youngsters, particularly in South America.

 

I don't think we'll go crackers, but we'll definitely strengthen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

It's going to be an interesting window. We know we hold long standing interests in Maddison and Pedro and it seems we're lining up a number of youngsters, particularly in South America.

 

I don't think we'll go crackers, but we'll definitely strengthen.

I’d probably take Pedro over Maddison. Think he’d be a better fit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, LFEE said:

I’d probably take Pedro over Maddison. Think he’d be a better fit.

Think that's a pretty wild choice.  Maddison one best players in prem at the moment.

 

 

Edited by Slim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...