Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Rich

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, Nine said:

If you dont understand that the way we play and train under Howe will invite injuries to players that are prone to (especially muscle/tendon) injury then I’m not sure what to tell you. We now deploy one of the most intense, fast paced systems in club football. I also gave you cold, hard evidence that he is getting injured more frequently under

this set up this season.. the % of games isn’t the the entire context here and that stat is thrown off by singular, isolated injuries of seasons past anyway. 
 

I understand if you are attached to the idea of him staying, and it’s ok to disagree on this. 

 

 

 

I'm not a sport physician so I have no idea what causes certain type of injuries. In general we haven't had that many injuries so it doesn't seem obvious to me that our playstyle makes us so vulnerable to them. And we have been playing with an intense playstyle ever since Howe came, it's not something he started with at the beginning of this season. 

 

Not going to deny that I'm attached to the idea of keeping one of our best and most exciting players :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

 

 

Nothing to complain about there. He looks great. We've been linked with lots of left backs, but he's the one who has impressed me the most.

 

Looks very two-footed. Packs a good shot with his right foot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too good a player to miss out on, but Leicester will try to start a bidding war, so unless we're his first preference, I think he'll go elsewhere.

 

Looked a very unhappy bunny after the Fulham game, talking about a lack of commitment from the team. However, it doesn't feel like, long-term, he's committed to the club himself, which may create a certain issue in the dressing room, whatever his performances on the pitch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Cronky said:

Too good a player to miss out on, but Leicester will try to start a bidding war, so unless we're his first preference, I think he'll go elsewhere.

 

Looked a very unhappy bunny after the Fulham game, talking about a lack of commitment from the team. However, it doesn't feel like, long-term, he's committed to the club himself, which may create a certain issue in the dressing room, whatever his performances on the pitch.

He will have a year left in the summer so only so much war can be created. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, sushimonster85 said:

I'm becoming more confident with Maddison. Largely because the only other club consistently linked with him is Spurs. You'd think he'd have be pretty short sighted to see them as a better bet going forward.

Pretty sure there are rumours he wants to move to London so spurs will probably be favourites.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure I want Maddison. Cracking player but seems to have completely shrunk in Leicester’s fight to stay up, been shite and attitude has been horrific by all accounts. 
 

Then again I’m sure Eddie will sort that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Danh1 said:

Not sure I want Maddison. Cracking player but seems to have completely shrunk in Leicester’s fight to stay up, been shite and attitude has been horrific by all accounts. 
 

Then again I’m sure Eddie will sort that. 

10 goals and 9 assists in 27 games this season 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

10 goals and 9 assists in 27 games this season 

Fair enough like! Just going from speaking to my mate who’s a Leicester fan, suppose he’s always going to be pissed off. :lol: 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Danh1 said:

Not sure I want Maddison. Cracking player but seems to have completely shrunk in Leicester’s fight to stay up, been shite and attitude has been horrific by all accounts. 
 

Then again I’m sure Eddie will sort that. 


Can happen to any player tbh - just needs to get out of there and start afresh - being in a scrap can take it out of players mentally 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like Maddison, but I wonder if I just have 'Paqueta' feelings towards him. 

 

You lot will know better, but I'm trying to work out where he would play. Left side of attack is the obvious one and I reckon Isak will make that spot his own. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Stal said:

I like Maddison, but I wonder if I just have 'Paqueta' feelings towards him. 

 

You lot will know better, but I'm trying to work out where he would play. Left side of attack is the obvious one and I reckon Isak will make that spot his own. 

I’d assume the right hand side and he would tuck in quite a lot.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a player like Maddison allows us to play 433 4231 4141 4411 442 - just this one player allows us to be so flexible, which we need to be next season - I’m all for it

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mikky said:

Having a player like Maddison allows us to play 433 4231 4141 4411 442 - just this one player allows us to be so flexible, which we need to be next season - I’m all for it

We can do all those formations now. Maddison wouldn't make us any more flexible on that score and while he offers an attacking threat greater than what we have I'm not sure if he can add off the ball.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Mikky said:

Having a player like Maddison allows us to play 433 4231 4141 4411 442 - just this one player allows us to be so flexible, which we need to be next season - I’m all for it

 

Exactly this. Part of the reason Maddison is such an exciting signing is his ability to play effectively in so many positions. Playing at home against a bottom half side who are sitting deep? Play him on the right of the 3 in midfield and he can move forward, effectively meaning we can transition into a 4-2-3-1 with him as the 10. Playing against a top side? Play him on the right of the front 3 and he can drop back and play as another midfield presence when needed. He adds something we don't currently have. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, madras said:

We can do all those formations now. Maddison wouldn't make us any more flexible on that score and while he offers an attacking threat greater than what we have I'm not sure if he can add off the ball.

 

4-2-3-1 / 4-4-1-1 is Isak dependent in the hole.

 

We don't have any alternatives. I'd like to see Isak himself with Maddison & an ASM type.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

 

4-2-3-1 / 4-4-1-1 is Isak dependent in the hole.

 

We don't have any alternatives. I'd like to see Isak himself with Maddison & an ASM type.

Where as I'd like a Maddison type but someone who can do the press and intensity that has made us what we've become. I'm just not sure he can do that.

 

 

Edited by madras

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...