Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, Abacus said:

£50m for Maddison seems a lot given the situation Leicester are in, and that he'll be wanting away.

 

Saying that, I wonder if that's the right way to look at it. I think the real question is, what would he be worth to us and therefore what should we be prepared to pay?

 

If we thought Gordon was worth £45m (and the jury is out on that one for sure), why do we think £30m is what Maddison would be worth to us?

 

Plus, more childishly, I'd just like to stop Spurs getting anyone they actually want and send them further into a tailspin.

It all comes down to contract length. 
 

£45m for a 21yo on a long term contract is reasonable enough (whether he has the talent/ability to justify it is an entirely separate argument). 

 

No one is paying £50m for a 26yo with one year left on his contract unless that player is a bona-fide elite level player.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, SteV said:

It all comes down to contract length. 
 

£45m for a 21yo on a long term contract is reasonable enough (whether he has the talent/ability to justify it is an entirely separate argument). 

 

No one is paying £50m for a 26yo with one year left on his contract unless that player is a bona-fide elite level player.

Surely it all comes down to what someone else will pay?

 

26 with 1 year left or not, if Spurs will pay £50m to take him from us, why would Leicester settle for £40m, unless the player refuses?

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I love how for weeks before we got top 4 all the journos said we had 3 lists of targets depending on what position we finished. Move forward a few weeks after getting champions league and we can’t afford Diaby and Szoboszlai and we are targeting players from relegated clubs.

 

They know shit.. just like when isak was signed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I love how for weeks before we got top 4 all the journos said we had 3 lists of targets depending on what position we finished. Move forward a few weeks after getting champions league and we can’t afford Diaby and Szoboszlai and we are targeting players from relegated clubs.


 

Spot on this. Let’s have it right, we seem to be doing business a lot more buttoned up now, they don’t usually get a sniff of who we are after until terms are agreed and it’s 95% done. Think Ashton and co have brought a lot more professionalism to our transfer dealings and the journos have been left well in the lurch. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

NE journos don't a clue. That slaphead Edwards does it all the time, said we couldn't afford Isak but then when we signed him "our budget had changed", trying to maintain his credibility. Let's be honest, last year we only knew about Botman initially from the French side, and Pope pretty much happened over night, same as Isak. The club are usually water tight when it comes to transfers. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, MrSnrub said:

NE journos don't a clue. That slaphead Edwards does it all the time, said we couldn't afford Isak but then when we signed him "our budget had changed", trying to maintain his credibility. Let's be honest, last year we only knew about Botman initially from the French side, and Pope pretty much happened over night, same as Isak. The club are usually water tight when it comes to transfers. 


Got your sash ironed for the 12th?

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Dr. TC said:

 

Surely it all comes down to what someone else will pay?

 

26 with 1 year left or not, if Spurs will pay £50m to take him from us, why would Leicester settle for £40m, unless the player refuses?

Well obviously, like any transfer (unless there’s a release clause) someone else can always come along and pay over the odds.
 

But in those situations, you’ve just got to walk away and let them get on with it. It only makes things increasingly hard going forward, and you end up consistently overpaying for players. Man Utd being a prime example.

Link to post
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Nucasol said:

I don’t think Spurs will want to pay £50m either. Leicester will weaken on that over the summer but it’s whether we want to wait knowing Eddie needs pre season with his players.

I really doubt they will pay it. They're haggling with Juve, trying to reduce the fee they'd agreed to pay for Kulusevski.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MrSnrub said:

NE journos don't a clue. That slaphead Edwards does it all the time, said we couldn't afford Isak but then when we signed him "our budget had changed", trying to maintain his credibility. Let's be honest, last year we only knew about Botman initially from the French side, and Pope pretty much happened over night, same as Isak. The club are usually water tight when it comes to transfers. 

 

I have some sympathy on the isak side the club did break the expected budget due to an intervention from the chairman so they were told in good faith can't afford 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Ankles Bennett said:

Hemel Hempstead was right on the edge of farmland with lots of great country pubs.  I often saw John Barnes on sunday mornings with his newspaper walking to my local, the Fishery Inn which was situated on the Grand Union canal in Hemel.  Happy days.

I'm not saying it isn't. Just not a life for me the commuting, pollution and general feel of London. Used to get to work stressed and tired and absolutely stressed and tired when home. Much happier now on the outskirts of Brighton in the south downs

Link to post
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I love how for weeks before we got top 4 all the journos said we had 3 lists of targets depending on what position we finished. Move forward a few weeks after getting champions league and we can’t afford Diaby and Szoboszlai and we are targeting players from relegated clubs.

 

Boils your piss like (keeping the theme of today going).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spot on about the journos not having a clue any more. Love the way the club acts now behind the scenes - making signings like Isak out the blue is more exciting to me than long drawn out saga's in the UK media. Think it was a Spanish paper that broke the Isak deal last year, we signed him the next day.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, relámpago blanco said:

I don't know why anyone bangs on about a budget. Eales has said that if the right player comes along well adjust to ensure we can sign them. We can't keep doing that forever but in the grand scheme of ffp we still haven't spent loads.

isn't the ffp a rolling 3 year profit process (I get i'm simplifying it) but on top of that sure I read somewhere we posted a £105m profit last season before takeover.  Using those as a very rough estimate, we haven't got masses of amounts to spend and will want to spend it conservatively as well I feel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My thoughts are

 

We have spent the previous 15 years trying to find excuses not to spend money

 

Now we have people in charge who are looking to develop and build from the ground up.. and will spend every penny available to get us there.

 

Signing Dan Ashworth was always to develop and identify emerging talent at the best cost... Brighton use it to flip players and build their cost base, Chelsea, man city did it so they could sell youngsters to fund the ffp of the first team.

 

Our early success has pushed us ahead of the plan and now we seem stuck between the two camps... Do we buy talent for the future and stick to the plan or focus on the  first team for next year's champions league campaign.

 

The latter might only be six games.. so maybe we are hedging our bets and going for the long term strategy.

 

 

Edited by RobsonsWonderland

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...