Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

Just now, Doctor Zaius said:

Think Moura with no obligation to buy would be a quality signing. 

 

Spurs would save on high wages for a bit part player and we'd get another outlet for the right. Could work very well.

 

No chance on a permanent though.

Howe has stated that a future fee must be included in any loan deals 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Nine said:

Moura doesn’t add up for me, if it’s a loan it will have to include an optional fee as Howe has stated before. Age and wage suggest it’s unlikely.

 

Don't think he ever said it would HAVE to include an optional fee. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Nine said:

Not for me, Miggy fits into this sides style better than Moura would. 

 

Wow. Not for me. Moura has a great strike on him. He'd get goals from that position more regularly and also dribbles past defenders so well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, KaKa said:

 

Wow. Not for me. Moura has a great strike on him. He'd get goals from that position more regularly and also dribbles past defenders so well.

He’d have a better goal/assist output no doubt but as fitting in our overall style you’d get more out of Miggy imo. Moura has been on a physical downturn for a little while now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Nine said:

He’d have a better goal/assist output no doubt but as fitting in our overall style you’d get more out of Miggy imo. Moura has been on a physical downturn for a little while now.

 

Has he? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nine said:

He’d have a better goal/assist output no doubt but as fitting in our overall style you’d get more out of Miggy imo. Moura has been on a physical downturn for a little while now.

 

Moura played a fair bit last season. Still looked as quick and dynamic as usual. Can't remember thinking he'd slowed down at all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Flip said:

 

Has he? 

Going off of what a Spurs mate has to say.. don’t get me wrong he’d be useful for us but I personally don’t think he’s the type of profile we’d go for now. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, jack j said:

Any reason why?

Spurs got loads of attacking options. He's not gonna get much game time there is he?


I don’t see Howe wanting him in for the long term and wouldn’t sign him just for the short term either. Just doesn’t fit with the profile we are looking at. Would I take him? Yes, as he is better than no one. Much rather see us go for Pedro. Which should be doable and probably not a good idea to wait either. 

 

 

Edited by Ikon

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Nine said:

I’m almost certain he was quoted as saying this back in Jan.. 

 

Asked if he would be open to loans, Howe said: “Yes, the structure of the transfer doesn’t matter to me. It’s about the individual.

 

"Matt Targett came in as a loan player, but committed to everything and felt like a Newcastle player from day one. Another individual’s character might be different, and you get the feeling they’re just here for a set time – and will then move on.

 

"I’d be reluctant to do those types of transfers, so it’s all about the person – and them committing to the club and team.

 

“It’s a feel you get from speaking to them and the agent. You’ll sense the commitment from the player very early. If you’re going to sign a player, they have to be committed to your club.”

 

 

 

 

Edited by KaKa

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...