Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ChrisMcQuillan said:

Why is it only our transfers seem to go like this? Everyone else just seems to get the deal done. We monitor for four years, low-ball first in a widely publicised saga, allowing a PSG/Everton to come in and hijack.

 

Everton and Villa took punts on the two managers we ruled out, they probably figure it's not a bad idea to chase our transfer targets,. They probably trust Howe's judgement over Frank or Stevie G.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChrisMcQuillan said:

Why is it only our transfers seem to go like this? Everyone else just seems to get the deal done. We monitor for four years, low-ball first in a widely publicised saga, allowing a PSG/Everton to come in and hijack.

I think it's because you're only really paying attention to what we're doing. Unless you're trawling Twitter/message boards for a load of other clubs of course, which I assume you don't (like most normal people!)

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, buzza said:

if Everton beat us to the signature of this player I will be hugely dissapointed in our management team!

That would be scraping the bottom!!:rant:

If Everton want to pay him a ridiculous salary I'd be disappointed if we matched them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Keegans Export said:

I think it's because you're only really paying attention to what we're doing. Unless you're trawling Twitter/message boards for a load of other clubs of course, which I assume you don't (like most normal people!)

If Romano has a 100% record then we are surely the first club to ever put it in jeopardy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PlymouthGeordie said:

 

How can you chalk it up to Fab? Even Downie has just said we've put a new bid in, why would we do that if we've already agreed a deal as per Fab?

 

 

 

Because we want to pay them twice ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Keegans Export said:

I think it's because you're only really paying attention to what we're doing. Unless you're trawling Twitter/message boards for a load of other clubs of course, which I assume you don't (like most normal people!)

 

You're probably right. I hope so, anyway!

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ChrisMcQuillan said:

Why is it only our transfers seem to go like this? Everyone else just seems to get the deal done. We monitor for four years, low-ball first in a widely publicised saga, allowing a PSG/Everton to come in and hijack.

Because we have a sensible wage structure and ain’t got the money like others have. Everton only can buy him because they are selling someone for £60m. How much did we get for Gayle, Hendrick, Clarke, Hayden, Woodman etc? How many new sponsors have we landed? 
 

We are trying align with FFP whilst allowing ourselves as much wriggle room for each transfer window. 
 

Hopefully the player has bought into the project. If he goes to Everton for extra few £K which they can probably offer him then maybe he wasn’t the player for us. Sunday showed this approach has been proven correct. Hopefully the lad if all this is true has a sensible agent etc advising him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, LFEE said:

Not at all ? Just think he gets unfairly criticised. It’s always binary these days with people. No middle ground. TBH not sure why I try to defend him on here as NO by and large seems very binary on the media along with players performances.

 

Like I stated though. He hasn’t been contradicted and on this occasion that is all that matters yet you and others can’t accept it. He might be wrong in past or in future but generally he reports with balance (and doesn’t confirm anything with a good deal of certainty) except when he defended Steve Bruce where he got sucked into the trap you are all now. Which I’ve always stated in the past.

 

I'm all for a bit of N-O bashing, but let's not pretend that Luke Edwards not being respected amongst our fans is an N-O thing or that it isn't without good reason - personal and professional. Even at talk ins and when he's a guest on podcasts you get the impression that even his fellow journalists find him insufferable.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's perfectly understandable that Everton might have decided to put in a late bid to snatch Pedro (probably without even having seen him play), but that doesn't mean he wants to go there. I reckon this is all but done bar crossing the t's and dotting the i's. Everton are just desperate, we can all see that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, LFEE said:

Not at all ? Just think he gets unfairly criticised. It’s always binary these days with people. No middle ground. TBH not sure why I try to defend him on here as NO by and large seems very binary on the media along with players performances.

 

Like I stated though. He hasn’t been contradicted and on this occasion that is all that matters yet you and others can’t accept it. He might be wrong in past or in future but generally he reports with balance (and doesn’t confirm anything with a good deal of certainty) except when he defended Steve Bruce where he got sucked into the trap you are all now. Which I’ve always stated in the past.

He’s was saying we were apart on fees when we weren’t, it’s a clear contradiction. You can take what you want from it but seeing the narrative from the club this window and seeing how Romano operates we can paint a decent picture of what’s happening.

 

Edwards is getting nothing from the club that isn’t confirmed. Romano has sources at Watford who have essentially given him the green light. Instead of learning from Romano the local journalists are digging down on the fact there’s ‘no deal’.

 

That isn’t a bad thing alone but you’re ignoring the wider point as to why people are sick of the likes of Edwards. 

 

 

Edited by Hanshithispantz

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LFEE said:

Not at all ? Just think he gets unfairly criticised. It’s always binary these days with people. No middle ground. TBH not sure why I try to defend him on here as NO by and large seems very binary on the media along with players performances.

 

Like I stated though. He hasn’t been contradicted and on this occasion that is all that matters yet you and others can’t accept it. He might be wrong in past or in future but generally he reports with balance (and doesn’t confirm anything with a good deal of certainty) except when he defended Steve Bruce where he got sucked into the trap you are all now. Which I’ve always stated in the past.

Unfairly? He’s spent the whole of Bruce’s time needling the fan base, is insufferably arrogant - see Ajax and Womens Football as two case studies - and is doubling down on this heel persona to remain relevant. It’s little wonder large chunks of our fan base think he’s a prick.

Link to post
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Kid Icarus said:

 

I'm all for a bit of N-O bashing, but let's not pretend that Luke Edwards not being respected amongst our fans is an N-O thing or that it isn't without good reason - personal and professional. Even at talk ins and when he's a guest on podcasts you get the impression that even his fellow journalists find him insufferable.

He’s well aware he’s seen as the villain since his Steve Bruce defence as do his piers who play along with it. So again claiming that they all find him insufferable is another binary/extreme conclusion. Seem to recall him getting the job of thanking Eddie Howe at the end of the season from the other journalists and him being thanked by the club for his level headed reporting etc.

 

Anyway. After listening to the majority of you on here I’m fully expecting Pedro to be holding up the shirt tonight after his medical etc is completed with the deal being fully agreed yesterday. Don’t let me down FR fanboys ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: Do we have to pick a side here? Can't I say I find Romano an insufferable bellend with his catchphrase-driven 'reporting', whilst Edwards is a piece of trash 'journalist' who I'd be happy to never hear the opinion of ever again?

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wormy said:

:lol: Do we have to pick a side here? Can't I say I find Romano an insufferable bellend with his catchphrase-driven 'reporting', whilst Edwards is a piece of trash 'journalist' who I'd be happy to never hear the opinion of ever again?


For sure. But one has better info than the other.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here’s a question, I’m aware of who Romano is only through his tweets. Whether he’s a tap in merchant or whatever or someone full of shit like Luke Edwards is irrelevant.

 

If we only ever repost his tweets and never read any of his articles, how on earth do they generate income for him? Like what’s the point of it all?

 

 

 

 

Edited by Dr Jinx

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dr Jinx said:

Here’s a question, I’m aware of who Romano is only through his tweets. Whether he’s a tap in merchant or whatever or someone full of shit like Luke Edwards is irrelevant.

 

If we only ever repost his tweets and never read any of his articles, how on earth do they generate income for him? Like what’s the point of it all?

 

 

 

 

 

As his social media following grows he gets invites to podcasts (some will be paid) TV and Radio Slots (again paid) and the more he’s seen and heard on TV and Radio the more he’s seen as credible and therefore his followers/social media grows even bigger…and so on and so on… Pretty straightforward ?

 

The more people you can reach and advertise what shows you will be on etc the more you asked on them to make the shows themselves relevant.

 

My friend had daughters trying to break into the acting/singing/dancing industry and along with talent the individuals social media presence was just as important as they knew they could reach more people advertising shows and tickets etc.

 

What a world we live in ?

 

 

Edited by LFEE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...