Jump to content

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, kingxlnc said:

We keep saying Joao Pedro for CF but he’s not an out and out striker. Back up is ok but if Isak is out we may become toothless upfront again 

 

why has buying enough players to fit your basic objectives become so damn difficult

 

 

Other way round for me. He seems more of a striker than a wide player, that's how I've always viewed him, although tbf I've not watched him that extensively. I think he would do fine as rotation for Isak. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, STM said:

I do wonder whether Eddie is thinking about taking a risk and bringing him in to start at RW. A risk in terms of JP not being used to that position, rather than him not being quality in general.

 

More of a free role from that position would work IMO.

 

Especially because of how well Tino gets up and down the line to provide width. 

 

Would allow for Pedro to come inside and find spaces to pick up playing off Isak.

 

Bruno could then be a bit more reserved in how much he pushes forward too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, KaKa said:

 

More of a free role from that position would work IMO.

 

Especially because of how well Tino gets up and down the line to provide width. 

 

Would allow for Pedro to come inside and find spaces to pick up playing off Isak.

 

Bruno could then be a bit more reserved in how much he pushes forward too.

It fits with how we originally bid for Maddison too, granted that was with Trippier at RB.

 

It always seemed an odd bid, given his lack of physicality, but it showed we were possibly willing to play with a playmaker on the wing. Joelinton too isn't your traditional winger but Howe's played him RW. 

 

 

Edited by Hanshithispantz

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ketsbaia said:

It's going to be strange spending £60m on a player who probably doesn't start in our best XI (unless he really can be pushed to RW).

 

Depth, versatility and fluidity are crucial for next season, though.

 

I'd find a way to start him over Murphy like. Although in reality they would both play a very important role in most of the games. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

It fits with how we originally bid for Maddison too, granted that was with Trippier at RB.

 

It always seemed an odd bid, given his lack of physicality, but it showed we were possibly willing to play with a playmaker on the wing. Joelinton too isn't your traditional winger but Howe's played him RW. 

 

 

 

 

Yeah, good point.

 

Last season Poch often played Palmer on the right wing, but he had freedom to find spaces to influence the game by coming inside, with Gusto overlapping. Was very effective.

 

Could see a similar setup if Pedro is played there.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The transfer window pendulum of panic and impatience has finally taken hold. Barely a week in haha.

 

I still think its a bit crazy price wise but this is a player we have wanted and scouted extensively for a LONG time at this point. He is acclimatized to the league too. IF the money is there its probably okay to stretch higher for a player we are convinced will be a hit. 

 

All the noises about him wanting to come and being open to playing anywhere across the front line has also swung me into the hope this happens and slightly dissapointed if it doesn't. 

 

Expect Chelsea to swoop in 3...2...1...

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

Another non update then from Edwards.

He was going on yesterday as it was close to a done deal almost. The same goes for Hope who mentioned a new transfer budget every god damn week. Quite sick of them all

 

 

Edited by nufc123

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, nufc123 said:

He was going on yesterday as it was close to a done deal almost. The same goes for Hope who mentioned a new transfer budget every god damn week. Quite sick of them all

 

 

 

It’s called “playing the fish” 🎣  Need to bite first mind 😉

 

 

Edited by PauloGeordio

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, LFEE said:


I think he’s concerned slightly how little certain games Isak is involved in so maybe someone more on his wavelength to play with and interchange positions etc during the game which obviously Murphy will not offer when that is needed.

We need ballers, we have a lot of graft and pace in the forward position but lacking a high level of tech. 

 

Isak exists alone, big gap to Barnes and another to Gordon. It'd take our offence to another level. 

 

Cunha and/or Buemo would have been near perfect...

Link to post
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, LFEE said:

 

What the fuck is the half-cut gimp going on about? The slapheeded prick has more hedges than Longleat Maze, this really hammers home how little he knows.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...