Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[SUPERTOON]

2 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

Straight from Richard Hughes that.

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Just now, Mike said:

 

 I keep saying the escapism is making me as angry as the shit I'm escaping.

 

Far more actually.

[OoOGazOoO]

2 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

 

 

Those 'stat' strikers are few and far between you know...

[54]

If Ben Jacobs wasn't such a wet wipe, i'd think about a thread title change. 

[TBG]

Public apology in STACK, WHEN

[AyeDubbleYoo]

PS it's not an really an initial offer if they aren't going to bid again.

[Kid Icarus]

They'll be back, the implication being that we 'opened the door'

 

Absolutely rank football club.

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Just now, TBG said:

Public apology in STACK, WHEN

 

Isak on the steps of SJP, Keegan style. 

[BergenMagpie]

IDK who came up with the «offended by everything, ashamed by nothing» but it’s probably the best phrase to describe someone/something every applied during human history.

Fuck em

[Deuce]

5 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Ok, on that basis unless something drastically changes that isn't possible. 

 

As I've said, the gap isn't closing financially and without getting to at least parity we are food. 

I…think we agree?  

 

I know it seems counterintuitive to argue that we should sell our best players as a means of moving forward, but that’s clearly the case with Isak (and something we have to consider with all our purples). Unless something drastic changes, we’re getting one more season out of Isak at most and the calculus necessarily changes.

[Optimistic Nut]

Is this Liverpool's version of "we tried" by the way?

 

Bet they regret signing Ekitike now. Could have stepped aside for him, fair chance we'd have potentially accepted something close to what they bid for Isak if we'd already had Ekitike on the books. 

[bobbydazzla]

STAT striker

 

Another example of how data nonces and xG is ruining the beautiful game

[TRon]

30 minutes ago, midds said:

I just think we need to consider him as 'medium term injured' and get on without him. Sign the players we were needing to sign anyway and continue to say no to them. If he had an acl or whatever we'd just have to get on with it and make do until he was available again, we'd survive, wouldn't be pretty but we'd get by. 

 

Just giving up because we're fed up of it is giving them isak on a plate much cheaper then necessary. Fuck them, make them jump through hoops for a month. String the cunts along, move the goalposts every day, fuck it

 

 

We are going to buy a striker anyway. It's not like we should be sweating on his availability THAT much. 

[AyeDubbleYoo]

Just now, Optimistic Nut said:

Is this Liverpool's version of "we tried" by the way?

 

Bet they regret signing Ekitike now. Could have stepped aside for him, fair chance we'd have potentially accepted something close to what they bid for Isak if we'd already had Ekitike on the books. 

 

I understand very little about this whole saga, unless it was just initiated by Isak's agent and Liverpool have jumped in. The planning is non-existent. 

[Ben]

4 minutes ago, Jaqen said:

£110m is a joke like, if true  Like knocking on your neighbours door offering him £30k for his £50k car he's already told you isn't for sale. 

 

And your neighbour is a buck toothed, shell, suit wearing, sticky fingered, thick gold chained wearing, Warthog

[Ketsbaia]

They'll bid again, it's now a question of whether they'll make a third bid.

 

Hopefully we tell the beloved, respectful Liverpool to fuck off because we have no reason to sell. 

[Kid Icarus]

They very well might still get Isak, but they'd 100% be getting him I'd we'd signed Ekitike.

[Mike]

WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF HOW DISAPPOINTED POOR OLD LIVERPOOL ARE.

[Pearljam10]

[Mike]

Just now, Kid Icarus said:

They very well might still get Isak, but they'd 100% be getting him I'd we'd signed Ekitike.

 

All I want to know by September 1st is what level of mug we are.

[Menace]

"we'll bid again but don't you dare reject it"

 

Up the price to £170m fuck them.

[r0cafella]

Just now, Deuce said:

I…think we agree?  

 

I know it seems counterintuitive to argue that we should sell our best players as a means of moving forward, but that’s clearly the case with Isak (and something we have to consider with all our purples). Unless something drastic changes, we’re getting one more season out of Isak at most and the calculus necessarily changes.

Your canny I would expect nothing less than agreement

 

Joking aside, I think that even if we were to sell our players and essentially come Brighton we still can't bridge the gap as replacing your best players over and over isn't feasible. We have to move up the value chain and make ourselves more attractive more commercial activities new stadium new training. 

 

Proper buy in and investment from the ownership is the only way. 

[The Prophet]

Right out the Mike Ashley playbook is this.

 

Unsettle player.

Lowball bid.

Hope player kicks up enough of  fuss for selling club to accept low ball bid.

[GEFAFWISP]

Just now, Mike said:

WON'T SOMEONE PLEASE THINK OF HOW DISAPPOINTED POOR OLD LIVERPOOL ARE.

They just wanted us to open the door. How terrible of Newcastle.

[Menace]

If we open the door they'll rob the fucking kettle.