Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[Thumbheed]

42 minutes ago, McCormick said:

Nah. If we say he’s for sale for 150m it just empowers those goons to put in a derisory 135m offer. If we say he’s not for sale then they have to match what we’re asking for. Time to remind everyone that he’s our player and he goes when it suits us.

 

Reject the bid?

 

He knows, his agent knows and Liverpool know the price. It will ease tensions a little once he realises they are the ones taking the piss, not us. 

[Benwell Lad]

Absolutely need to take the hard stance and not succumb to a contracted player's wishes or Liverpool playing cartel politics.

Otherwise we may as well just scrap the "project", surrender, accept that our place is not at the top end of the PL and that the cartel clubs can just use us to further their own ambition and greed.

 

[Nucasol]

18 minutes ago, David Edgar said:

Wonder what the Amore asshole, Bocce buffoon, Cannoli clown, Ducati dimwit, Espresso idiot, Fiat fucker, Gondola goon, Hand-gesture halfwit, Italiano ignoramus, Juventus jerk, Kappa klutz, Linguine loser, Mafioso moron, Napoli numbskull, Olive oaf, Pizza prat, Quattrocento quack, Risotto reprobate, Spaghetti slimeball, Tiramisu twerp, Uffizi usurper, Vespa vermin, Wine-cellar wazzock, X-mas panettone pinhead, Yachting yahoo, Zamboni zero CUNT is gonna tweet this afternoon in response.

[Zero]

As I said before, once the issue escalates to the level that affects PIFs reputation, they will give out the toughest response.
 

1. They would not accept the consequence that other view PIF / Saudi state as “weak”

 

2. They would not allow such a small issue would have impact on their other 99% investments 

 

 

I know some of you are suggesting we are going to sell Isak once we got replacement. That’s actually quite logical if our owner is just a normal owner. But I won’t rule out that PIF would really go for the craziest option - sign replacements and let Isak rot for three years. I know this may hurt us in long term but PIF care about this when their reputation is at risk

[Smal]

The Edwards piece is basically the club saying that he's not for sale unless Liverpool bid £150m, and tough tits if Isak doesn't like it. Personally I wouldn't sell him to Liverpool for £150m but it's a step in the right direction imo.   

[STM]

29 minutes ago, tarie4 said:

And if they dont bid the correct fee? Then what?

He stays.

[Kid Icarus]

3 minutes ago, Skeletor said:

 

Most likely all the replacements are now gone so we've decided Isak isn't going.

Let's hope so. I'm fully in spite Liverpool mode now tbh, hate how they've acted so much that I think I'd even prefer selling him to Man United or Chelsea at this point.

[Kanj]

150m has never been unreasonable. Anyone saying so in the press is fucking stupid like. It’s world class money for a world class striker with 3 years left on his contract at the age of 25. He doesn’t just score tap ins or penalties only, he scores big goals in big games versus some of the best defenders in the world. Thats why the price is higher than most. Further, given the lack of quality strikers in football today the demand for his talent is limited to only a few clubs who can afford him; again further driving the price up. You could argue it should be far more, as it’s showing it would require Newcaslte to spend 100m+ to find 2 strikers to give similar output in goals on paper. 

[STM]

While i dont believe a word of it, the club actually having a strong stance is at least something.

[JUICE690]

1 minute ago, Smal said:

The Edwards piece is basically the club saying that he's not for sale unless Liverpool bid £150m, and tough tits if Isak doesn't like it. Personally I wouldn't sell him to Liverpool for £150m but it's a step in the right direction imo.   

I'd Steve Parish the shit out of it if they met our 150 mil valuation.

[Smal]

1 minute ago, JUICE690 said:

I'd Steve Parish the shit out of it if they met our 150 mil valuation.

yep. If they can bid £150m then put the price up to £180m. 

[Zero]

3 minutes ago, STM said:

While i dont believe a word of it, the club actually having a strong stance is at least something.

normally I would agree with you that it’s just a tactic to ask for more fees.

 

but it’s Saudi. You need to take this into consideration. They can genuinely “take it personally” and not acting like a normal owner. There is a chance that even Liverpool offer 150m we would still reject it

 

 

Edited August 9, 2025 by Zero

[AyeDubbleYoo]

So the headline says he won’t be sold and is furious, but the article says he will be sold if they pay the price? 

[Moose]

27 minutes ago, David Edgar said:

Wonder what the Amore asshole, Bocce buffoon, Cannoli clown, Ducati dimwit, Espresso idiot, Fiat fucker, Gondola goon, Hand-gesture halfwit, Italiano ignoramus, Juventus jerk, Kappa klutz, Linguine loser, Mafioso moron, Napoli numbskull, Olive oaf, Pizza prat, Quattrocento quack, Risotto reprobate, Spaghetti slimeball, Tiramisu twerp, Uffizi usurper, Vespa vermin, Wine-cellar wazzock, X-mas panettone pinhead, Yachting yahoo, Zamboni zero CUNT is gonna tweet this afternoon in response.

 

Belissimo signore! Belissimo!

 

[Geogaddi]

Torn between hating the cunt and never wanting to see him play for us again, or keeping him here just to piss him and Liverpool off whilst showing we aren't a soft touch in the process .

[et tu brute]

I obviously hope Edwards is right for a rare occasion. Then I can enjoy immensely the scouse meltdown, especially that bald Irish cunt

[Mahoneys Tache]

A few years ago when I was managing a small hospital I interviewed this kid for a junior role. He’d been a qualified mental health nurse for about 8 months. He presented well and I was going to offer him the job. I rang the agency up and their response was ‘Tim feels like he needs a more senior role.’

‘Tim shouldn’t have applied for the job then. Tell Tim to get some experience, do some nightmare night shifts, and come back when he’s earned it, if there’s a job. In the meantime, Tim can go and bollocks.’

the agency were taken aback that their bright young hope for a fat fee was not going to get his own way.  We never heard from said agency again. 
isak = Tim. 

[sempuki]

We need two forwards in first before he's pictured with the vomit inducing YNWA scarf.

[1964]

18 minutes ago, Thumbheed said:

 

Reject the bid?

 

He knows, his agent knows and Liverpool know the price. It will ease tensions a little once he realises they are the ones taking the piss, not us. 

You reckon?  I don't, his rage will be at us for not accepting a bid his team think is fair.  He won't blame Liverpool for sure 

[Pandamninator]

12 minutes ago, Smal said:

yep. If they can bid £150m then put the price up to £180m. 

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVFckYwEzzc

 

The only correct answer when Liverpool finally meet the proper valuation.

[Mahoneys Tache]

1 minute ago, 1964 said:

You reckon?  I don't, his rage will be at us for not accepting a bid his team think is fair.  He won't blame Liverpool for sure 

Maybe the penny will drop that his agent is a cunt? 

[Optimistic Nut]

Think Liverpool will end up with regrets after this window, like. If they'd left Ekitike alone we might have ended up letting Isak go for £130m-ish, in the knowledge we had our replacement secured. Either that, or they weren't as keen on Isak as Isak was on Liverpool and put in a token bid where if accepted then great, if not, meh. Similar to how they bid £12m or so for Owen when we bid £16m. 

[Groundhog63]

2 minutes ago, Mahoneys Tache said:

Maybe the penny will drop that his agent is a cunt? 

Isak and his agent in "who's a cunt" debate

 

[HayDen Traces]

20 minutes ago, Smal said:

The Edwards piece is basically the club saying that he's not for sale unless Liverpool bid £150m, and tough tits if Isak doesn't like it. Personally I wouldn't sell him to Liverpool for £150m but it's a step in the right direction imo.   

Absolutely love this from the ownership. Not taking any shit, you don't fuck around with us

[bobbydazzla]

16 minutes ago, Mahoneys Tache said:

A few years ago when I was managing a small hospital I interviewed this kid for a junior role. He’d been a qualified mental health nurse for about 8 months. He presented well and I was going to offer him the job. I rang the agency up and their response was ‘Tim feels like he needs a more senior role.’

‘Tim shouldn’t have applied for the job then. Tell Tim to get some experience, do some nightmare night shifts, and come back when he’s earned it, if there’s a job. In the meantime, Tim can go and bollocks.’

the agency were taken aback that their bright young hope for a fat fee was not going to get his own way.  We never heard from said agency again. 
isak = Tim. 

 

Not wanting to piss on your chips, but if the way I’m reading it is correct, that analogy doesn’t really work, unless:

 

Tim was one of the best in the world in that particular job

 

And you’d tapped up Tim because he worked at another hospital and was doing great things there 

 

And you’d paid some people on social media to say Tim should definitely leave his current job to come and work at your hospital

 

And Tim had a contract with 3 years left at his current job so you’d have to pay the other hospital for him to join you 

 

And the offer you made to the other hospital for Tim was derisory so they rejected it 

 

And Tim self certified himself as being off sick, so he didn’t have to go to work

 

And the agency was a Serbian gangster 

 

And Tim was a Judas cunt 

 

If all those things happened, then yes, Tim = Isak 

 

 

Edited August 9, 2025 by bobbydazzla