CheikBoom Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 The full clip isn't that bad. He's very complimentary but the presenter is constantly trying to engineer an Arsenal + Isak comment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Armchair Pundit Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Just so fed up to the back teeth of the total disrespect and attempted engineering from some quarters around the insistence that Isak should be or will be going to Arsenal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 21 minutes ago, Colos Short and Curlies said: Thats the other thing with Liverpool.. Salah, Trent, Van Dijk all potentially leaving on a free. They'll need to spend some wedge to replace them (even if not directly but in the squad), so £150m on one player is unlikely They are on course to win at least one trophy this season and will definitely be in the CL next season. So if they don't have the funds to replace them, it does call into question the fees being paid at present anyway. I suppose you could argue that Liverpool have the PSR headroom to spend whatever it takes, but just don't want to. Then that calls their ownership into question regardless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Just now, TRon said: They are on course to win at least one trophy this season and will definitely be in the CL next season. So if they don't have the funds to replace them, it does call into question the fees being paid at present anyway. I suppose you could argue that Liverpool have the PSR headroom to spend whatever it takes, but just don't want to. Then that calls their ownership into question regardless. It's not that they cant afford to replace them, but they have managed to get a situation where 3 of their top players might leave on a free at the same time and non of the replacements will come cheaply. They've already spent a decent wedge on Marmalade as well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 1 minute ago, Colos Short and Curlies said: It's not that they cant afford to replace them, but they have managed to get a situation where 3 of their top players might leave on a free at the same time and non of the replacements will come cheaply. They've already spent a decent wedge on Marmalade as well The alternative would have been to sell those players before they got to their final year. That begs the question would they have had the same success with replacements? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 So good Arsenal fans have put together a compilation of him bodying VVD because he’s been so dominant against Arsenal they want to show it’s par for the course for the lad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belfast Boy Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Heres a question. With Isak, Gyokeres, Kulusevski and Elanga, why are Sweden so shite? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafalove Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Needs a better song Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donut Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 25 minutes ago, Belfast Boy said: Heres a question. With Isak, Gyokeres, Kulusevski and Elanga, why are Sweden so shite? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andycap Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 City and chelsea are the only two who I think Could afford him. Real and psg on the continent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mush Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 No way he leaves us for fucking Arsenal now anyway. That's pretty much a lateral move. If he does leave it'll be to Man City/Liverpool/Real Madrid etc. He's already outgrown Arsenal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 If you sell him to one of the top premier league teams, you're setting that team up to dominate the league for the next 5 years. No amount of money is worth that. If and when we have to sell him, it has to be to a club on the continent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 19 minutes ago, Andy said: If you sell him to one of the top premier league teams, you're setting that team up to dominate the league for the next 5 years. No amount of money is worth that. If and when we have to sell him, it has to be to a club on the continent. I've said this previously. As a matter of principle, especially with the so called top 6 conspiring to make things difficult for Newcastle, he should under no circumstances be sold to any of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawberry Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 (edited) We have to give a raise to Isak. This make me disappointed more than lack of new signing. Make him the best paid player. Edited February 6 by Strawberry Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Keggy_Keagal Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 This is what Spurs had to put up with for years with Kane. The media were selling him for about 5 years before he left Tottenham. I can't see it this summer for Isak unless it's a superclub or possibly Liverpool as a panacea to the fanbase should they lose Salah and Trent. That being said I don't where they stand from a PSR point of view as both of those would on free transfers so not much incoming unless I'm mistaken. Summer 26 depending where we are I'd say is far more likely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted February 6 Share Posted February 6 Isak in Liverpool red would be the hardest visual to take. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 https://x.com/skysports_keith/status/1887826375286923371?s=46 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 Bloke is an absolute drip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokerprince2004 Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 I actually feel Merson has been taken out of context on that interview and been done a bit dirty tbh If you watch the full segment he constantly bigs up how fantastic and big a club we are, says we we're magnificent against Arsenal and that if we qualify for CL or start winning cups then why should he move as we're also potentially massive. Think it was more Hayley McQueen constantly asking him about Arsenal needing strikers and even said to him would Isak be a good fit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 20 hours ago, Belfast Boy said: Heres a question. With Isak, Gyokeres, Kulusevski and Elanga, why are Sweden so shite? Same as Norway I assume with Haaland, Ødegaard, Bobb, Sørloth and Nusa. Most of the players behind them are utter shite and rather than trying to play to their strengths, the managers tries to plug the leaky defence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 1 hour ago, gdm said: https://x.com/skysports_keith/status/1887826375286923371?s=46 Fair play to Keith. But they're fucking still talking about Arsenal ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toon25 Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 (edited) On 06/02/2025 at 12:25, Fak said: What irritates me most about this garbage that Sky keep spouting about Isak to Arsenal is that not one of these pundits are entertaining the idea that Isak might not actually want to leave and it's entirely possible he loves it here. Everytime you watch us on Sky or there's a segment on us on SSN they keep churning out this perception that Isak is just mulling around at Newcastle and he's just waiting and hoping that Arsenal swoop in and rescues him from Newcastle. The arrogance and delusion is incredible. If they think he's too good for Newcastle then he's sure as shit way too good for Arsenal. If and when he does leave then he deserves to go somewhere that does wins trophies, not to a team of nearly men managed by the biggest wet-wipe in the league with the most mentally unhinged set of fans in the country. This cunt is the worst. Edited February 7 by toon25 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 Realistically I think Real Madrid is the only club that would be willing to pay what he would cost and he would potentially want to go to, PSG could afford him but I don't think he'd want to play there, Man City could afford him but I can't see them being in the market for him while they have Haaland. He's played himself way out of Arsenal's league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astroblack Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nine Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a striker that has that knack of making the ball stick to them quite like he does. Im not just talking about his first or second touch, just the amount of times I’ve seen a ball played to him and I think it’s going to bounce awkwardly or just not going to reach him cleanly and he manages to fully take it into his stride. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now