Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

Spurs got 100m for Kane. Spurs are interesting because they spent a lot on Johnson which I imagine is because they couldn’t get a striker in. 

The net spend was similar. 
 

I just think it’s gone under the radar that Spurs have spent A LOT of money. 
 

I was one that thought Spurs don’t need a striker.  Son and Richarlison are good options there.  They are easier to replace on the wing. 
 

Get the best out of Son and you’ve got a lad that can get you 20 goals a season. 

 

 

Edited by The College Dropout

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...