Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Match fixing this. There'll be loads of lads in China, Paqueta Island etc making an absolute pile on this result because they've been told it was guaranteed and nobody will bat an eye as it's an expected Chelsea home win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Novocastrian said:

I’m speechless. This should cause a huge backlash into the use of VAR and the poor standard of officiating. It won’t though.

Its not poor standard. Its doing exactly as its supposed to like FFP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Marquee Moon said:

3 goals overturned vs Chelsea in 3 games now.

 

I've never seen the rule they used to rule out Eze's freekick applied before & this one they've just invented a foul.

They certainly never used it last season, when Reece James scored a late equalising free kick against Bournemouth, at the same end as the Eze kick.

image.png.22c5facaa9f4ebb360c4cc40c91e5e50.png

Look at the position of both Cucurella and Jackson, is it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ronson333 said:

Premier League corrupt as FUCK

I hope our fans have a loud rendition of that today to show its not just sour grapes  when the cartel get a decision. 

 

Can't wait until til we play Forest and have 10mins of both sets of fans before and right up until ko.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The ball was blasted at Pedro from about a foot away. No issue with that really. They’ve been consistent with these penalties for ‘handball’ at least. Even if it is a bit ridiculous.

 

But Caicedo catches Iwobi just before the cross. So if we’re giving out pointless free kicks for ‘careless challenges’. Then that should be a foul and all

Link to post
Share on other sites

While I agree with all the cries of corruption, I also find it strange that today's game seems to discriminate against people with arms. The best defender today would surely be someone with exquisite balance and two amputations.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

Don't understand why they're going on about the ball hitting Pedro's hand. Clearly from a yard away. The Fulham one jumps in with his arms in the air above his head the numpty. 


The push is more of a foul.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its honestly just pathetic to hear the commentators talking about how "Fulham do get goals from the bench" as if it actually matters after what we've all just seen.  They've managed to make the game such a farce I cant take it seriously.

 

 

Edited by Teasy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mistakes cost managers jobs, mistakes cost players their position in the starting eleven. 

 

Mistakes cost referees what? They ought to be relegated to EFL and the better EFL referees promoted. 

 

No consequences hence no care in decisions being made

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

Don't understand why they're going on about the ball hitting Pedro's hand. Clearly from a yard away. The Fulham one jumps in with his arms in the air above his head the numpty. 

 

Since when did distance make any difference for a basic handball?  If you control a ball with your hand, deliberately or otherwise its a free kick surely.  Ive never seen it done any other way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That’s bollox - as soon as a cartel club concedes there’s a visible attitude to actively search for a way to disallow the goal by VAR.

CLEAR AND OBVIOUS. When will they start to use this basic VAR rule?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...