Ronson333 Posted Saturday at 11:09 Share Posted Saturday at 11:09 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted Saturday at 11:45 Share Posted Saturday at 11:45 Oooof, doesn’t inspire confidence Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted Saturday at 11:50 Share Posted Saturday at 11:50 3 minutes ago, gbandit said: Oooof, doesn’t inspire confidence Perhaps he just needs all things to be fair and equal? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chapo Posted Saturday at 12:02 Share Posted Saturday at 12:02 And he's gone Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted Saturday at 18:20 Share Posted Saturday at 18:20 Quote Couple told their 'offensive' number plate was banned now have it on display in garden The Bristol duo who were informed they could no longer sport their cherished number plate, a purchase of some three decades past due to DVLA's recent classification of it as 'offensive', have ingeniously showcased it in their garden instead. To the couple, fervent fans through and through, the digits stood for 'Number one for the Gas', 'the Gas' being an affectionate moniker for their beloved team. Yet, the DVLA has rescinded the plate on the grounds that it might be misconstrued as a racial slur. Hmmmm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NUFC91 Posted 20 hours ago Share Posted 20 hours ago Fair play they smashed us but I hate everything about Aston Villa...got a weird obsession about Newcastle, whenever they beat us it's "ya big day out" it's weird that they still bang on about us getting relagated 16 years ago. Had to laugh at the Mickey mouse cup comments coming out of Villa Park yesterday. They sharp forget that day they relagated us and time after we got relagated at Villa Park they were giving away tickets to get 32k, Just watch that video of Cabayes goal mid week there, thousands of empty seats.. Anyway rant over... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted 19 hours ago Share Posted 19 hours ago 1 minute ago, Beren said: My friend effectively has CCTV inside his house, with audio (for reasons unbeknownst to me - he has a 2 year old kid, so maybe that?). Should he tell people when they come over? (Not as a legal duty, but just as a good thing to do). I reckon he should but my moral compass is generally out of sync with wider society. Does he have a VAR booth in the loft? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago Beautifully done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JUICE690 Posted 12 hours ago Share Posted 12 hours ago (edited) Is 4-1 a thrashing? I don't think it is. 3-0 wouldn't be deemed a thrashing. 3-0 is, well beaten. I mean, obviously you have to take into account the manner of defeat but if one teams beats another by, say, 2 goals to 0 (but out played them for 90 minutes), it still wouldn't be described as, a thrashing. Personally, I think 4+ without reply is a thrashing. Having said that, did we 'thrash' PSG? I'd say we 'battered' PSG. Cheers. Edited 11 hours ago by JUICE690 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Anything 3 goals or more is a thrashing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolfcastle Posted 11 hours ago Share Posted 11 hours ago Don't think you go from 2-0 being a standard non-descript defeat/victory to 3-0 being a thrashing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted 10 hours ago Share Posted 10 hours ago On 19/04/2025 at 09:17, Yorkie said: Yes. It's very funny. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, Optimistic Nut said: Beautifully done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack j Posted 45 minutes ago Share Posted 45 minutes ago 11 hours ago, JUICE690 said: Is 4-1 a thrashing? I don't think it is. 3-0 wouldn't be deemed a thrashing. 3-0 is, well beaten. I mean, obviously you have to take into account the manner of defeat but if one teams beats another by, say, 2 goals to 0 (but out played them for 90 minutes), it still wouldn't be described as, a thrashing. Personally, I think 4+ without reply is a thrashing. Having said that, did we 'thrash' PSG? I'd say we 'battered' PSG. Cheers. 4-1 is a bigger thrashing than 3-0 5-2 is also better than a 4-1. In my brain obviously. Sure everyone else will disagree Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now