Jump to content

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Keggy_Keagal said:

I'd go with Joelinton for LW for the final. I think he'd body Arnold and would also help with the cover for Salah .  

 

 

 

not enough pace to trouble arnold tho and make him think about going backwards

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cookie1892 said:

not enough pace to trouble arnold tho and make him think about going backwards


Willock being on that side and linking up with his old mate might. 
 

Barnes rarely looks fast for us, either. Makes some clever off the ball runs, mind. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cookie1892 said:

not enough pace to trouble arnold tho and make him think about going backwards

He'd absolutely bully Trent. 

 

I'd love to the return of the 2 Joe's dovetail on the left with Barnes on the right. It'll take a massive effort from the Liverpool midfield and Trent to contain that and crossed to the back post would cause problems for them as well. 

 

Plus, with Hall out, I'd be happy to gamble leaving Tino and Salah 1 vs 1.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, M1tche said:

He'd absolutely bully Trent. 

 

I'd love to the return of the 2 Joe's dovetail on the left with Barnes on the right. It'll take a massive effort from the Liverpool midfield and Trent to contain that and crossed to the back post would cause problems for them as well. 

 

Plus, with Hall out, I'd be happy to gamble leaving Tino and Salah 1 vs 1.


Sort of related. But what I noticed most from Big Joe back yesterday. Was that contested ball played into him in the air, or back to goal around chest height. It was suddenly an option as an out ball again. He often did well and retained possession, or turned away from his man. 
 

I know his passing is still loose and he nearly gave a goal away. But considering how poor our build up is at times. It’s a great option to have. Especially if he is in that hybrid left channel sort of role he plays. Where he will be able to isolate the full back in the air or to get his body in. 
 

I thought we were worse once he went off. Had much more control first half. Although he was probably always only doing 55-60 minutes. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Nine said:

I’m on this side of the fence to, however he has work to do on the defensive side of his game. Time on the pitch obviously helps but Howe is always giving Barnes a lot of direction mid game, I just hope he becomes more coachable as he’s getting more minutes because if he can adapt a bit and take on more responsibility he will be a great asset for us. 

 

 

 

He's not an apprentice you know.  He knows his way around a football pitch.  He's actually a very good footballer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking forward to seeing him on the left. I think he his deceptively quick and knows when to run and when not. He is also a better finisher than Gordon. Willock has been sadly disappointing so can't see him playing there

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think so, but I do think there's an element of right player wrong time about him. Ideally you want a player like Barnes to come in as more of a finishing touch when you need an impact sub to complement what you already have - like Liverpool got with Jota and Arsenal got with Trossard. £40m on that type of player when you still need a starting RW and RCB and back up CF might not have been the best allocation of resources with the huge benefit of hindsight. 

 

 

Edited by Kid Icarus

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

I don't want to sidetrack @Cfexcellent player ratings thread but the Harvey Barnes rating which seems to be a c at the time of posting got me thinking. 

 

Did we overpay for him? 

In the three seasons prior to him signing:

 

2021/22: 40 games, 13 goals, 3 assists

2020/21: 48 games, 11 goals, 13 assists

2019/20: 35 games, 13 goals, 4 assists

 

Would say based on that, £40M is probably about right for him. Sometimes players and clubs don't work out in the same way, but it doesn't mean it was an overpay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, 54 said:

In the three seasons prior to him signing:

 

2021/22: 40 games, 13 goals, 3 assists

2020/21: 48 games, 11 goals, 13 assists

2019/20: 35 games, 13 goals, 4 assists

 

Would say based on that, £40M is probably about right for him. Sometimes players and clubs don't work out in the same way, but it doesn't mean it was an overpay.

I'm not sure of the answer to my own question FWIW. I go back and forth on it. His stats are definitely impressive on paper but for me he's quite limited given the price and wages. I just wanted to gauge some thoughts as CFs great thread for me thinking. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, r0cafella said:

I don't want to sidetrack @Cfexcellent player ratings thread but the Harvey Barnes rating which seems to be a c at the time of posting got me thinking. 

 

Did we overpay for him? 


Nah, that’s going rate for his output. Just we clearly had Gordon set as RW, but he went to Euro u21s, smashed it up, then came into season with confidence. Barnes injury and Gordon made LW his own.

 

I believe a good fee is still there for him, because he’s a one in three LW if played regularly, which attracts clubs. Needs to produce final run of games, stay injury free, for us to get that though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...