Dokko Posted March 30, 2024 Share Posted March 30, 2024 1 minute ago, RodneyCisse said: He was class when he came on wasn’t he?  Not a patch on Burn. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe1984 Posted March 30, 2024 Share Posted March 30, 2024 1 minute ago, RodneyCisse said: He was class when he came on wasn’t he? He usually is. Very rarely gets to being the issue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteV Posted March 30, 2024 Share Posted March 30, 2024 Just now, RodneyCisse said: He was class when he came on wasn’t he? Indeed. The best part about it being he looked defensively capable, which has obviously been the question mark.  Don’t think there’s ever been a question mark (at least IMO) about his ability in possession. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BergenMagpie Posted March 31, 2024 Share Posted March 31, 2024 Delighted for him. Hopefully this will be the beginning of the end of the weekly wanker roundtable debate on him being the worst transfer of all time. The last 80 odd pages here have been copy paste aids Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted March 31, 2024 Share Posted March 31, 2024 He was excellent. Aggressive in the tackle, direct, and made some anticipated interceptions. He worked his bollocks off and looked a real handful. Loved his cameo. Has to start going forward. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beth Posted March 31, 2024 Share Posted March 31, 2024 Wouldn't be at all surprised if Dummett comes in at CB and Burn played LB on Tuesday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted March 31, 2024 Share Posted March 31, 2024 Â Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted March 31, 2024 Share Posted March 31, 2024 He was class. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcmk Posted March 31, 2024 Share Posted March 31, 2024 Looked good, hopefully it was evidence of the extra time Howe and the coaches have put into his development. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted March 31, 2024 Share Posted March 31, 2024 Massive 20 minutes from him.  Hope he’s done enough to start on Tues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 Why not start with the back 4 that finished. Murphy Schar Burn Hall  Nee idea who plays RW like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Holmesy Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 3 minutes ago, Groundhog63 said: Why not start with the back 4 that finished. Murphy Schar Burn Hall  Nee idea who plays RW like Could Anderson do a job at RW? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 (edited) 1 minute ago, Holmesy said: Could Anderson do a job at RW? Why not? Kid's fearless and skillfully. I know he sees himself as a CM but, why not. Edited April 1, 2024 by Groundhog63 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 I wouldn’t get too excited. Wham were totally defeatist by the time Hall came on. If Trips is fit to start I wouldn’t be surprised to see some permutation that means Hall is on the bench again. And, tbh it would probably be for a good reason.  He made some good blocks when he came on but it was mostly high up the pitch. I do trust Howe to judge if he’s ready to be positionally sound when defending our box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vaj Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 Even if he is suspect defensively, we are absolutely terrible at the back at the moment without him so we may as well be terrible at the back with him albeit with more of an attacking threat that he brings. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 Has to start on Tuesday - we've no one else fit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Upthemags Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 With what he's shown us in such restricted circumstances, it would be malpractice to start Burn over him at LB. He was an instant game changer for us, and was crucial to the build up for that second Harvey Barnes goal if memory serves. Beggars can't be choosers and we can't be leaving what limited quality we have to fester on the bench with the season on the line. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 21 minutes ago, Upthemags said: With what he's shown us in such restricted circumstances, it would be malpractice to start Burn over him at LB. He was an instant game changer for us, and was crucial to the build up for that second Harvey Barnes goal if memory serves. Beggars can't be choosers and we can't be leaving what limited quality we have to fester on the bench with the season on the line. I think it was the Isak scuffed chance that he starts from deep and then pops up for the cutback.  The last apps have perhaps suited his talents, with the way the games were when he came on. But he was impressive nonetheless.  Feels like he would be pushing for a start even if Lascelles and Tino were available. But he has to start tomorrow, surely?  Even if Trippier is back. I’d rather him at RB and Hall LB. Than Krafth coming in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWMag Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 This is the thing, we brought Krafth on instead and still shipped 3 goals. Can’t imagine it would have been more if Hall had come on originally.  just give him some starts man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCormick Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 Where’s Targett, out of interest anyway? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BermyToon Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 4 minutes ago, McCormick said: Where’s Targett, out of interest anyway?  He's out injured with an achilles tendonitis; he wasn't the best piece of business for £15M.  I hope Hall gets to start at LB for the rest of the season. Burn can play as a centre-half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
80 Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 22 minutes ago, BermyToon said: Â He's out injured with an achilles tendonitis; he wasn't the best piece of business for ÂŁ15M. Â I hope Hall gets to start at LB for the rest of the season. Burn can play as a centre-half. Seriously? Where did you hear that? Thought he was still busy with his hamstring. JFC if true... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 There’s no real other option. burn and Schar at CB. Hall only fit left back. It’s either Krafth or Trips right back assuming Livramento is hurt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 33 minutes ago, 80 said: Seriously? Where did you hear that? Thought he was still busy with his hamstring. JFC if true... Howe confirmed it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sibierski Posted April 1, 2024 Share Posted April 1, 2024 Even if Tino is fit, we need to shift away from him being the default back up LB, because it doesn’t maximise his ability going forward and 2, it’s not going to be his long term position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now