Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TK-421 said:


So for any FFP/PSR experts... would that still benefit us, even though the fees are (allegedly) close, that we get £40m for Minteh, but then the way it all works the outlay on DCL is spread so not simply a 'like for like' transfer/fee, in reality?

Out of £40m for Minteh (if we got anywhere near that), what are we potentially left with, taking account of his original fee, time left / ammortisation on current deal, etc?

 

 

 

 

Aye. Say for arguments sake they both went for £40 million (excluding wages). 

 

We pay £8 million this season for DCL, over a five year deal. Then the entire £40 million for Minteh goes on the books now. Meaning a £32 million profit. Granted, I've read any players bought now, can be put on next year's books. I'm not sure how accurate that is though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Lish007 said:

Best scenario is we buy DCL for 37m and sell them Minteh for 30m.

 

He has one season in the PL. We have a buy back clause of 35m and buy him back the next season. 

 

Everyone is a winner. 

Why would Everton agree to this? I'd be pissed off if we done deals like that. They could double his value in the first season and them have to sell him back to us for almost half. Imagine if we'd done a deal like that for Bruno or Isak

Link to post
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Lish007 said:

Best scenario is we buy DCL for 37m and sell them Minteh for 30m.

 

He has one season in the PL. We have a buy back clause of 35m and buy him back the next season. 

 

Everyone is a winner. 

I’d give up if we paid that for him 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Bishops Finger said:

Why would Everton agree to this? I'd be pissed off if we done deals like that. They could double his value in the first season and them have to sell him back to us for almost half. Imagine if we'd done a deal like that for Bruno or Isak

FFP.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I’d give up if we paid that for him 

 

Regardless of what we pay for him, I don't think it can be viewed in terms of normal value. We're clearly fudging the books here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I’d give up if we paid that for him 

Aye it seemed mental to me as well but it seems a case of fiddling the books if minteh is going the other way for a similar amount

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Dokko said:

Can't wait to drop significant money on DCL who'll spend half the season injured and then be gaslighted by the club claiming hindsight & bad luck. 😂 

 

I like DCL as a player. Happy to take him next season on a free, and think we'd get more out of him than wilson, but if we're proper skint, this is a move which will hold us back in the same way Tonali & Barnes has, but at least you can state luck and hindsight there. 

Last summers transfer activity doesn't make much sense. I guess we thought FFP and no teeth.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The College Dropout said:

Last summers transfer activity doesn't make much sense. I guess we thought FFP and no teeth.

 

Can't believe people are still running this argument. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, TK-421 said:


So for any FFP/PSR experts... would that still benefit us, even though the fees are (allegedly) close, that we get £40m for Minteh, but then the way it all works the outlay on DCL is spread so not simply a 'like for like' transfer/fee, in reality?

Out of £40m for Minteh (if we got anywhere near that), what are we potentially left with, taking account of his original fee, time left / ammortisation on current deal, etc?

 

 

 

Don't know how long his contract is but let's say of the £8m fee, he's amortised 1.5m, we'd have 6.5m as his remaining book value. So taking home over £30m.

 

If we insert a buyback, I assume Everton would want at least 20% profit. So say he signs for £40m, the buyback would be close to £50m surely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Doctor Zaius said:

Calvert Lewin is an absolutely honking signing. No two ways about it. 


 

 

On 24/01/2023 at 12:23, Doctor Zaius said:

Gordon is rubbish and not what we need at all. Take one look at an Everton forum and itll tell you all you need to know. 


Keep finding that hill to die on brother…

Link to post
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

 

Can't believe people are still running this argument. 

What argument? Our spending last summer has meant we have to sell players this summer to be FFP compliant. Is it not worth questioning the activities last summer?

Link to post
Share on other sites

But Gordon was very young, we knew he had pace to burn and that he was a pressing machine. And no major injury worries. Huge potential that is being realised.

 

DCL does not have the same attributes. He’s been living off a purple patch from 4 years ago and his next injury will probably keep him out for a few months. I don’t get it, I’d honestly rather have Chris Wood back.. at least he’s reliable in terms of his body not breaking down.

 

Its a luxury signing when you know the rest of your squad is 100% - but it’s not though is it.

 

 

Edited by Dr Jinx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't the only one that said that. The majority of the fanbase were wrong. Happy to hold my hands up. 

 

Has literally no bearing on whether Calvert Lewin is any good though. 

 

 

Edited by Doctor Zaius

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...