Jump to content

Newcastle United 1-0 AFC Wimbledon (01/10/2024)


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Jonas said:

Anybody around at the time get Oldham 96 vibes from that?

How could you not really?

 

I was around at the time and have absolutely no idea what 'Oldham 96' means. Maybe it's because I'm forgetful or maybe it's cause, you know, I actually have a life and haven't addled my brain with endless minutiae drawn from old football matches!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TRon said:

 

Would agree in principle, but was still disappointed with our lack of initiative when we had the ball. Players just didn't know what to do with the ball even given all the time in the world on it. 

From what I saw, it looked like we were patient with it, knowing that the opportunity would come eventually. And once in front and Wimbledon still just sat back we were more than happy to just play out the game and go through without exerting ourselves 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Blimey Willock had a shocker didn’t he😂 Dull as dishwater, slow to move the ball, awful passing and the midfield non existent in the first half but I enjoyed being back in the Gallowgate. Got through which is the main thing. 

 

 

Edited by ExiledGeordie

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Gottlob said:

 

I was around at the time and have absolutely no idea what 'Oldham 96' means. Maybe it's because I'm forgetful or maybe it's cause, you know, I actually have a life and haven't addled my brain with endless minutiae drawn from old football matches!

We played Oldham in the league cup in 1996 a few days after beating Man Utd 5-0, playing pretty much a full strength side, and we won 1-0 through a Beardsley FH penalty

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Nobody said:

From what I saw, it looked like we were patient with it, knowing that the opportunity would come eventually. And once in front and Wimbledon still just sat back we were more than happy to just play out the game and go through without exerting ourselves 

 

Second half that was true. First half we just looked we didn't know what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Gottlob said:

 

I was around at the time and have absolutely no idea what 'Oldham 96' means. Maybe it's because I'm forgetful or maybe it's cause, you know, I actually have a life and haven't addled my brain with endless minutiae drawn from old football matches!

Was explained fully in the bit you deleted from the repost mind, almost as if you had to do that to make that point, congrats on that life though

Link to post
Share on other sites

To have so much of the ball with so much time and so much space and create so little is more than a bit concerning I can't lie. To need a pen to get past a league 2 side and barely working their keeper all night is very unimpressive.

 

I know it's only the cup and the result is the only thing that matters but it's still a really poor show tbh. Never carved them open all night despite having about 85% of the ball but a win's a win :undecided:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, midds said:

To have so much of the ball with so much time and so much space and create so little is more than a bit concerning I can't lie. To need a pen to get past a league 2 side and barely working their keeper all night is very unimpressive.

 

I know it's only the cup and the result is the only thing that matters but it's still a really poor show tbh. Never carved them open all night despite having about 85% of the ball but a win's a win :undecided:

2nd half would have been very different if we needed a goal though. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing we all know about cup games against lower league opposition is that they’re always representative of wider trends, hence the reason we won the league that season we battered Morcambe 7-0 under Bruce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

Would agree in principle, but was still disappointed with our lack of initiative when we had the ball. Players just didn't know what to do with the ball even given all the time in the world on it. 

The whole starting midfield tonight are poor technically in possession, don’t think our wide players are particularly creative, or composed, needs a real change  in philosophy from Howe on the type of player he wants.

 

The fact we wanted Elanga in the summer before even getting into the fee they wanted rang alarm bells for me, just more of the same all pace and power with no craft.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Whitley mag said:

The whole starting midfield tonight are poor technically in possession, don’t think our wide players are particularly creative, or composed, needs a real change  in philosophy from Howe on the type of player he wants.

 

The fact we wanted Elanga in the summer before even getting into the fee they wanted rang alarm bells for me, just more of the same all pace and power with no craft.

 


I might be mis-remembering. But I remembered his Bournemouth teams having far more competent ball players. Not big names by any means. Just players that were a bit more composed and creative on the ball. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, midds said:

To have so much of the ball with so much time and so much space and create so little is more than a bit concerning I can't lie. To need a pen to get past a league 2 side and barely working their keeper all night is very unimpressive.

 

I know it's only the cup and the result is the only thing that matters but it's still a really poor show tbh. Never carved them open all night despite having about 85% of the ball but a win's a win :undecided:


Anybody would think they didn’t have 10 players in their own box almost the entire game, it’s all very well saying they’re a League 2 side is all well and good, but look at their recent clean sheet stats. They’re clearly a well drilled and organised team who tried to hang into the game as long as possible. 
 

I swear some people go on as if this isn’t typical of a lot of early cup round games every year. Remember the multiple games against Stevenage for example

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Big Geordie said:

Flat and unremarkable game - but it's a win. :thup:

 

Wimbledon were very organized and put in a proper shift. Full credit to them. :)

 

Thought they were too, didn't budge an inch with ten players in the box for 85min. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Myleftboot said:

Young lewy miley should replace him and he should be moved on.

Miley didn’t look anything like the same level when he was playing last season.  The lad clearly has bags of potential, but he looked lightweight and not quite ready just yet.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thought it was a pretty professional performance, so in a minority here. Comfortable win, controlled the game and some good minutes for the likes of Osula.

 

I don't think anyone should expect to steamroller a lower league team in a cup tie. Not the most exciting watch, agreed, but actually quite enjoyed it anyway for getting the job done with no drama.

 

 

Edited by Abacus

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...