Newcastle United 3-0 Aston Villa - 26/12/24

[STM]

4 minutes ago, NSG said:

Something that annoyed me a little bit is that I think Bruno’s goal should have stood.
 

If the ball had gone in directly off his arm then yes disallow it, but the sizeable deflection off the defender on the post after Bruno’s touch actually turned the ball in. The deflection from Bruno’s arm was going wide and therefore the goal would have been deemed an OG rather than a Bruno goal, meaning his touch was an “assist” rather than him being the goal scorer.

 

 

 

 

 

Spot on. It's been bugging me that nobody has mentioned it.

[NSG]

6 minutes ago, STM said:

 

Spot on. It's been bugging me that nobody has mentioned it.

The check was over in seconds so I bet they didn’t even look at that part of it.

[SteV]

One of the better, more rational, away fan videos I’ve seen:

 

https://youtu.be/hGMXaeJhhZU?si=WUO1lW26Qk8tFoLy

[Lotus]

1 minute ago, NSG said:

The check was over in seconds so I bet they didn’t even look at that part of it.

They really need to take their time with important decisions like that. We should have had 4. Emery would agree.

[El Prontonise]

30 minutes ago, joeyt said:

I can be persuaded either way with the red card. My initial reaction was he didn't mean it

 

Careful joey, you didn't say you've played the game so know exactly what happened.

[Froggy]

[SUPERTOON]

Emerys reaction confirms it was a red for me. He was even watching it back on the screen as well.

[Lush Vlad]

4 minutes ago, El Prontonise said:

 

Careful joey, you didn't say you've played the game so know exactly what happened.

I mean. Playing the game at any level is almost irrelevant. If you’ve ever tried to avoid standing on something or someone or a pet, dog shit, anything really. Then it’s blatantly obvious that he did all he could to hit Schar. Not the other way around. 
 

But yeah. I played a bit  and you know when someone goes in to do someone or not. 

[Yorkie]

19 minutes ago, NSG said:

Something that annoyed me a little bit is that I think Bruno’s goal should have stood.
 

If the ball had gone in directly off his arm then yes disallow it, but the sizeable deflection off the defender on the post after Bruno’s touch actually turned the ball in. The deflection from Bruno’s arm was going wide and therefore the goal would have been deemed an OG rather than a Bruno goal, meaning his touch was an “assist” rather than him being the goal scorer.

 

It would be obscenely draconian to scrub it off even without the deflection but as you say, the deflection makes it an outright error from the VAR. Fucking shite.

 

Bin off the farcical offside application and we've got five at Ipswich n'all. 

[Holloway]

Duran can fuck off with the faux astonishment as well, calculating prick.

[RS]

It’s David Edgar’s terrible crack where he drops an unnecessary negative post and fucks off. I could understand and have done it myself in the Ashley/wank manager era but this team is set-up to compete and be successful.
 

However, predicting a defeat after 10 minutes and then blaming not predicting a sending off as a reason for his prediction not coming to fruition is mental and was rightly called out.

 

 

Edited December 27, 2024 by RS

[The Butcher]

Wouldn't have complained too much if the ref had given him a yellow.

 

Reading on Villatalk and they call our players for cheats. Forgot to mention Rogers throwing himself to the ground, holding his face, when Joelinton just nicked him in the chest.

[Lish007]

Feel like the bad blood between us and Villa is coming back!

[Groundhog63]

Need the tunnel cctv released 

[GeordieDazzler]

[Joe1984]

Loved Joelinton waving Duran off with a grin on his face, followed by Duran booting the water bottle. 

 

Peak entertainment right there! 😄

[joeyt]

20 minutes ago, RS said:

It’s David Edgar’s terrible crack where he drops an unnecessary negative post and fucks off. I could understand and have done it myself in the Ashley/wank manager era but this team is set-up to compete and be successful.
 

However, predicting a defeat after 10 minutes and then blaming not predicting a sending off as a reason for his prediction not coming to fruition is mental and was rightly called out.

 

 

 

 

And him describing Gordon's goal as "crazy" suggesting it was fortunate

[STM]

37 minutes ago, El Prontonise said:

 

Careful joey, you didn't say you've played the game so know exactly what happened.

 

[Lenny]

There was a lot "he's just a young lad" comments and inference in the commentary, so I was expecting him to be 18 or thereabouts. 21 whilst young, isn't really an age that warrants peddling such a narrative. 

 

Even if it was an accident, his attitude across the game, and by the sounds of things,in general, doesn't do him any favours and suggests he's got it in him to do it. 

[Hanshithispantz]

32 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

It would be obscenely draconian to scrub it off even without the deflection but as you say, the deflection makes it an outright error from the VAR. Fucking shite.

 

Bin off the farcical offside application and we've got five at Ipswich n'all. 

What is the actual rule?

 

That's never a penalty at the other end. Accidental handballs with your arm by our side will be disallowed if it goes straight in, but will stand if it was going wide and was deflected in?

[David Edgar]

6 minutes ago, joeyt said:

 

And him describing Gordon's goal as "crazy" suggesting it was fortunate

 

Not at all. You are being really weird now. Really weird.

 

 

[Chris_R]

57 minutes ago, NSG said:

Something that annoyed me a little bit is that I think Bruno’s goal should have stood.
 

If the ball had gone in directly off his arm then yes disallow it, but the sizeable deflection off the defender on the post after Bruno’s touch actually turned the ball in. The deflection from Bruno’s arm was going wide and therefore the goal would have been deemed an OG rather than a Bruno goal, meaning his touch was an “assist” rather than him being the goal scorer.

 

 

 

 

Haha yes I thought this. Didn't watch the replays in real-time as I got distracted but on MOTD I immediately thought that. It's an OG, not a Bruno goal, so the handball goes back to being accidental and irrelevant.

[LFEE]

1 hour ago, joeyt said:

I can be persuaded either way with the red card. My initial reaction was he didn't mean it

I get what you mean but as I explained after the game to a Villa fan thinking it was a bit harsh you’ve got to put the incident to one side and piece together Dhuran’s actions leading up to it as he got more and more frustrated.

 

Schar was catching him offside a couple of times quite cutely and also beating him to the ball by reading the game better frustrating him then also he was took off the free kick Digne took which he showed frustration with also.

 

Turned to the lad next to me and said he’s losing his head a bit. Next thing he rakes Schar with each foot with at least one of them avoidable 

[joeyt]

Just now, David Edgar said:

 

Not at all. You are being really weird now. Really weird.

 

 

 

How was the goal crazy?

[David Edgar]

29 minutes ago, RS said:

It’s David Edgar’s terrible crack where he drops an unnecessary negative post and fucks off. I could understand and have done it myself in the Ashley/wank manager era but this team is set-up to compete and be successful.
 

However, predicting a defeat after 10 minutes and then blaming not predicting a sending off as a reason for his prediction not coming to fruition is mental and was rightly called out.

 

 

 

 

I didn't drop a negative post and fuck off. I posted all game. 

 

I also gave a full overview of my opinion which has been completely ignored for these simplistic barbs.

 

Still, you guys do you.