Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Mountain said:

 

I was actually talking about Gordon. I love Big Nick, he doesn't have a blinking tick. (not that it is an issue, I really like Gordon and often defend him)

Well that’s blinking confusing. I’m responding to a post about NW you take it as being about AG. Someone must have taken their eye off the ball. Perhaps repeatedly twice every  nanosecond. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Coffee_Johnny said:

Well that’s blinking confusing. I’m responding to a post about NW you take it as being about AG. Someone must have taken their eye off the ball. Perhaps repeatedly twice every  nanosecond. 

 

My mistake, all good :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Mentioning someone has a tick is being an insensitive cunt? [emoji38]

 

I've got a similar tick (got a few actually), it's nee bother but Mountain's right in that it's probably tied to something mental. 

 

Calling someone an insensitive cunt is probably worse than the guy mentioning Gordon's constant blinking tbf :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Mentioning someone has a tick is being an insensitive cunt? [emoji38]

 

I've got a similar tick (got a few actually), it's nee bother but Mountain's right in that it's probably tied to something mental. 

 

Thanks mate, it was merely an analysis and not being rude, I think genuine analysis without bias can be insightful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Mentioning someone has a tick is being an insensitive cunt? [emoji38]

 

I've got a similar tick (got a few actually), it's nee bother but Mountain's right in that it's probably tied to something mental. 

 

Thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Fak said:

 

You don't think he meant his goal vs. Union?!

 

5 minutes ago, Smal said:

 

you don't think his goal midweek was on purpose?

 

I think it was more Diame than Henry, like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, M4 said:

 

There was definitely a split moment where the whole ground went very quiet.

 

Around me, as soon as he started that stuttery run up, literally dozens were saying 'Oh for fucks sake, just hit it!', and it looked like he was missing it, until it hit the net. Amazing penalty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

 

 

I think it was more Diame than Henry, like.

 

controversial take imo :lol: 

 

Don't think you do that kind of action unless it's deliberate. 

 

 

Edited by Smal

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yorkie said:

 

It's definitely not a concern because he's new to the league and, as you say, it's good that he's in those positions. You've got to be scoring that second one though imo; that's the difference between what we have and what we've lost. 

 

I think he's class. Just eager to him scoring from open play with his feet (on purpose).

Isn't Isak's conversation rate worse than Nick's over the last year or so? That may be bollocks tbf, but sure I saw the stats and his hit rate was really high, and it's continued here.

 

The first snatch shot was going in but their defender reacted really well, unless it's someone like Griezman who might be quick thinking enough to pull off a cheeky finish, I think most strikers just lash it towards goal like Nick did and it's half luck whether it goes on.

 

He should have buried the 2nd. Reminded me of Isak's in the cup against Arsenal tbf (although that went in off the bar).

 

 

 

 

Edited by Hanshithispantz

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Doctor Zaius said:

Woltemades v Union is one of them where you just try to get something on it as it's coming at pace. Instinctive but with a fair slice of luck too. Diame knew nothing of his at Brighton like.

 

Anyway, his pen was absolutely class

Yep, I reckon this is spot-on - he meant it, but it also required as much luck as skill

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: it's not a hill I'm especially willing to die on. I think Zaius has provided the nuanced argument.

 

Like I say, just keen to see him look more threatening before I feel convinced that he's going to score goals routinely (this season).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sat in the upper gallowgate behind the goal and was convinced it was going well wide after he hit it. :lol:

 

Great that he has that confidence to take the ball and then score the pen in that way. Seems super committed to the cause and I think he has a lot of room for improvement.

 

Amazing how routinely he can just draw 3-4 oppo players towards him. Was a hard game for him yesterday, particularly in an isolated first half and with an unsympathetic ref but his attitude was absolutely perfect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Showed great character and confidence to want to take the penalty.

As a new player there's not a lot to gain (expected to score) but a whole lot to lose if he misses.

Shola did the same a couple of times against Sunderland, he was already getting stick and to miss would have made it infinitely worse.

Love players with that kind of mental strength. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Hanshithispantz said:

Over the past year, according to FBref:

 

Per 90, Isak has 5 shots for every non-penalty goal, Woltemade has 4. Statistically atleast he has been more clinical.

 

 

 

We're becoming good sellers eh 😅

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...