Bimpy474 Posted Sunday at 16:09 Share Posted Sunday at 16:09 Just now, gjohnson said: are people seriously having a wobble over losing a player we haven't even signed yet? Of course they are Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted Sunday at 16:21 Share Posted Sunday at 16:21 1 hour ago, duo said: 🤷♂️ He's the "move on" police around here. As you say, let's if there is a clause and what it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted Sunday at 16:30 Share Posted Sunday at 16:30 https://as.com/futbol/primera/golpe-del-madrid-con-victor-munoz-se-asegura-una-opcion-de-recompra-f202606-n/ "Real Madrid has managed to retain a buy-back option for one season in the three-way deal that is about to be finalized between Osasuna, Newcastle and Victor Muñoz , which exposes all those who said it was all a stepping stone for the striker to end up at Barcelona. Real Madrid never opposed the transfer , mainly because it was a decision of the Navarrese club and the player once the Madrid entity did not decide to activate either the buy-back option or the right of first refusal, but they have reached that meeting point in case what is anticipated happens, such as the definitive explosion of the fast player in the Premier League. Barcelona was another team that explored the possibility of signing him . In fact, they were the first to inquire about his situation, but if there was one thing the player and his agent were clear about, it was that they had no intention of entering into a conflict with Real Madrid, the club that trusted him to develop and showcase his talent on his path to the elite level , something that has been key to his breakout season at Osasuna..." Seems as though it's all about stopping Barca from buying him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted Sunday at 16:36 Share Posted Sunday at 16:36 5 minutes ago, The Prophet said: https://as.com/futbol/primera/golpe-del-madrid-con-victor-munoz-se-asegura-una-opcion-de-recompra-f202606-n/ "Real Madrid has managed to retain a buy-back option for one season in the three-way deal that is about to be finalized between Osasuna, Newcastle and Victor Muñoz , which exposes all those who said it was all a stepping stone for the striker to end up at Barcelona. Real Madrid never opposed the transfer , mainly because it was a decision of the Navarrese club and the player once the Madrid entity did not decide to activate either the buy-back option or the right of first refusal, but they have reached that meeting point in case what is anticipated happens, such as the definitive explosion of the fast player in the Premier League. Barcelona was another team that explored the possibility of signing him . In fact, they were the first to inquire about his situation, but if there was one thing the player and his agent were clear about, it was that they had no intention of entering into a conflict with Real Madrid, the club that trusted him to develop and showcase his talent on his path to the elite level , something that has been key to his breakout season at Osasuna..." Seems as though it's all about stopping Barca from buying him. seems like it's on this, doesn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted Sunday at 16:37 Share Posted Sunday at 16:37 (edited) I dont see the problem with buyback clause. His not going to be so good that Real buy him back when you look the players they have. Edited Sunday at 16:39 by KingArthur Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted Sunday at 16:38 Share Posted Sunday at 16:38 Just now, KingArthur said: I dont see the problem with buyback clause. His not going to be so good that Real buy on back when you look the players they have. if he has that good, we've won anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted Sunday at 16:39 Share Posted Sunday at 16:39 Depends on what the fixed amount of the buy-back is or if they just have first right to buy him over anyone else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted Sunday at 16:39 Share Posted Sunday at 16:39 And the buyback is only for one year right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted Sunday at 16:45 Share Posted Sunday at 16:45 4 minutes ago, joeyt said: And the buyback is only for one year right? Needn’t even worry about it as Howe will only play him three times as a 90th minute sub Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted Sunday at 16:45 Share Posted Sunday at 16:45 7 minutes ago, KingArthur said: I dont see the problem with buyback clause. His not going to be so good that Real buy him back when you look the players they have. If it has to be done to sign him then we have to do it, but even if he's quality for us but not quite Real Madrid level, they could buy him and make a few quick Euros next summer by selling him on themselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted Sunday at 17:11 Share Posted Sunday at 17:11 32 minutes ago, lovejoy said: if he has that good, we've won anyway. Totally depends on the clause. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe1984 Posted Sunday at 17:12 Share Posted Sunday at 17:12 34 minutes ago, KingArthur said: I dont see the problem with buyback clause. His not going to be so good that Real buy him back when you look the players they have. Barca just bought Gordon. 🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted Sunday at 17:17 Share Posted Sunday at 17:17 5 minutes ago, nufc123 said: Totally depends on the clause. Not really. it wont be for less than we paid, if he comes here and kills it and mardid want him, its a glorified loan. all good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted Sunday at 17:19 Share Posted Sunday at 17:19 Just now, lovejoy said: Not really. it wont be for less than we paid, if he comes here and kills it and mardid want him, its a glorified loan. all good. Yes, but if we want to progress as a club we ideally want to earn a ton of money on our successful signings that we let go of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted Sunday at 17:19 Share Posted Sunday at 17:19 1 minute ago, lovejoy said: Not really. it wont be for less than we paid, if he comes here and kills it and mardid want him, its a glorified loan. all good. If he has 45m clause and going to Madrid to be a key player we have lost. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
duo Posted Sunday at 17:20 Share Posted Sunday at 17:20 What I will say is I am sure Wilson is no mug and will do what's best for the club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted Sunday at 17:22 Share Posted Sunday at 17:22 Just now, duo said: What I will say is I am sure Wilson is no mug and will do what's best for the club Most likely so, yes. Think all the talk is more hypothetical in this scenario. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted Sunday at 17:23 Share Posted Sunday at 17:23 Just now, duo said: What I will say is I am sure Wilson is no mug and will do what's best for the club Im confident of a good summer, I love the idea of young quick powerful players that Howe can mould Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted Sunday at 17:27 Share Posted Sunday at 17:27 14 minutes ago, Joe1984 said: Barca just bought Gordon. 🤣 They did. To replace Rashford. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted Sunday at 17:27 Share Posted Sunday at 17:27 41 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: If it has to be done to sign him then we have to do it, but even if he's quality for us but not quite Real Madrid level, they could buy him and make a few quick Euros next summer by selling him on themselves. Not so easy. Player has a say also. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted Sunday at 17:35 Share Posted Sunday at 17:35 I can live with it if the fee is high and it's an insurance policy for Real Madrid to stop Barcelona getting him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gawalls Posted Sunday at 17:51 Share Posted Sunday at 17:51 1 hour ago, The Prophet said: https://as.com/futbol/primera/golpe-del-madrid-con-victor-munoz-se-asegura-una-opcion-de-recompra-f202606-n/ "Real Madrid has managed to retain a buy-back option for one season in the three-way deal that is about to be finalized between Osasuna, Newcastle and Victor Muñoz , which exposes all those who said it was all a stepping stone for the striker to end up at Barcelona. Real Madrid never opposed the transfer , mainly because it was a decision of the Navarrese club and the player once the Madrid entity did not decide to activate either the buy-back option or the right of first refusal, but they have reached that meeting point in case what is anticipated happens, such as the definitive explosion of the fast player in the Premier League. Barcelona was another team that explored the possibility of signing him . In fact, they were the first to inquire about his situation, but if there was one thing the player and his agent were clear about, it was that they had no intention of entering into a conflict with Real Madrid, the club that trusted him to develop and showcase his talent on his path to the elite level , something that has been key to his breakout season at Osasuna..." Seems as though it's all about stopping Barca from buying him. Then it makes no sense as they're not protected from us selling to Barcelona after two years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted Sunday at 17:58 Share Posted Sunday at 17:58 38 minutes ago, nufc123 said: If he has 45m clause and going to Madrid to be a key player we have lost. How? Explain? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe1984 Posted Sunday at 18:00 Share Posted Sunday at 18:00 1 minute ago, lovejoy said: How? Explain? Because if he's going to be a key player for Madrid, we could get more for him? Then again if we asked for more, Madrid could just shrug their shoulders and buy whoever else comes along because they're Madrid... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted Sunday at 18:01 Share Posted Sunday at 18:01 1 minute ago, lovejoy said: How? Explain? If he comes in and does so well that he looks well above a 45 million player and he has to be sold for that lower fee because it's already been agreed, that would be pretty shite. It's one thing to have to sell a player on your own terms. Having to now agree these dumb fees beforehand and stick to them even if the player you've signed far outperforms that value, is ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now