Jump to content

St James' Park: club plans to expand existing site further to completion of feasibility study (Edwards)


Delima

Recommended Posts

Guessing the signage needs planning as its illuminated.

 

 

Wonder if they are going to paint/replace those sh*tty brown doors, which also stand out a mile, now.

 

Haven't seen the column they painted 'in the flesh' yet, but on that 2nd picture (behind SBR), it look like it might be grey to match the cladding above?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest covmag

Guessing the signage needs planning as its illuminated.

 

 

Wonder if they are going to paint/replace those sh*tty brown doors, which also stand out a mile, now.

 

Haven't seen the column they painted 'in the flesh' yet, but on that 2nd picture (behind SBR), it look like it might be grey to match the cladding above?

 

 

I believe it’s silver

Link to post
Share on other sites

As if Ashley will give a flying fuck about a sign and some paint.

 

he won't even find out about it

 

Well the direction or permission came from somewhere to do this lipstick on a pig response to the criticism of the ground. 

 

i meant the council thing tbh

Link to post
Share on other sites

So they've also put up a new turnstile sign, which doesn't match any of the other existing signs all around the ground. So are they doing them all or just that one?

 

Again, just smacks of what it is... a quick, probably cheap fix/tart up, that won't be followed up elsewhere.

 

And that wall might look worse as its is probably soaked after last nights rain. At least the black paint hasn't washed off. Yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest chopey

I wonder if these refurbs have been demanded by the stadium manager I remember he took some stick around the turn of the year and he was quick to defend himself, so he might just have bullied Charnley into the tart up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: 'Played.

 

They'll probs just make em submit an application but it's a bit of pain in the arse paperwork. Every little helps.

Yeah, they’ll no doubt grant in retrospect, and it does happen quite often. However it is an indication to Charnley and Ashley that the fans will be on top of everything, and where ever we can, we’ll attack.

For those saying it might need permission because it’s illuminated, all signs need planning permission, illuminated or not. The sign for the turnstiles will also go down as a 2nd infringement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: 'Played.

 

They'll probs just make em submit an application but it's a bit of pain in the arse paperwork. Every little helps.

Yeah, they’ll no doubt grant in retrospect, and it does happen quite often. However it is an indication to Charnley and Ashley that the fans will be on top of everything, and where ever we can, we’ll attack.

For those saying it might need permission because it’s illuminated, all signs need planning permission, illuminated or not. The sign for the turnstiles will also go down as a 2nd infringement.

 

Sad sad people

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: 'Played.

 

They'll probs just make em submit an application but it's a bit of pain in the arse paperwork. Every little helps.

Yeah, they’ll no doubt grant in retrospect, and it does happen quite often. However it is an indication to Charnley and Ashley that the fans will be on top of everything, and where ever we can, we’ll attack.

For those saying it might need permission because it’s illuminated, all signs need planning permission, illuminated or not. The sign for the turnstiles will also go down as a 2nd infringement.

 

Sad sad people

 

It’s ok they’re not members of Steve Bruce’s Donnay Army (We hate Rafa) so you’re safe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Howaythetoon

Drive past earlier looks as tacky in the flesh as I thought it would, few people walking around in their new Ashley FC tops as well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: 'Played.

 

They'll probs just make em submit an application but it's a bit of pain in the arse paperwork. Every little helps.

Yeah, they’ll no doubt grant in retrospect, and it does happen quite often. However it is an indication to Charnley and Ashley that the fans will be on top of everything, and where ever we can, we’ll attack.

For those saying it might need permission because it’s illuminated, all signs need planning permission, illuminated or not. The sign for the turnstiles will also go down as a 2nd infringement.

 

To be pedantic, it's advertisement consent not planning permission and, whilst you are technically correct that all advertisements need consent, many forms are advertisement are either excluded from the need for consent or granted deemed consent by the Advertisement Regulations. A turnstile sign would be likely to fall within one of those classes of advertisement benefiting from deemed consent, depending on its size and other factors.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol: 'Played.

 

They'll probs just make em submit an application but it's a bit of pain in the arse paperwork. Every little helps.

Yeah, they’ll no doubt grant in retrospect, and it does happen quite often. However it is an indication to Charnley and Ashley that the fans will be on top of everything, and where ever we can, we’ll attack.

For those saying it might need permission because it’s illuminated, all signs need planning permission, illuminated or not. The sign for the turnstiles will also go down as a 2nd infringement.

 

Sad sad people

 

It’s ok they’re not members of Steve Bruce’s Donnay Army (We hate Rafa) so you’re safe.

 

Neither am I mate

 

You are a cunt though

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...