All Activity

Think no matter what combo you go with our midfield will struggle in a 2.

It’s the only way spending £50m+ on JP makes sense. JP best position is at 10/second striker. Why would you spend so much money on him and play him in a position that’s not his best? It also puts the Cunha links into context.

Kevin Keegan and Les Lerdinand

He’s been getting a lot of negative press for this but to me it sounds like a reasonable thing to do.

Welcome to Chelsea PLC.

Still never worked out what he was pointing at there.

I dont believe a second that Howe changes his system.

Tried to sign him before if memory serves.

Remember when tapping up wasn’t allowed? Now you have this pizza shagger doing it in plain sight for a massive audience.

About £25m left on his book value. So that would be a £55m profit. For the next season we also get rid of his £2,6m yearly wage and £8m in amortization. Thats means a wiggle room of £65m looking from the perspective of the next season alone. Lets say we split that in £40m in amortization and £25m in contract costs for new arrivals. £40m in amortization = £200m in transfer cost.. Essentially means that we wouldn't have to worry about PSR at all this season atleast.

Because 120m is most of our budget, and we need more than 2.

I'm not keen on him but I suppose he did thump Van Hecke in training, so I'm warming to the idea.

We went for Isak instead if I remember correctly.

No, I'm generalizing. He'd have improved most top clubs in England last year had he been sold in the summer. Either way, I'm talking about the idea of signing a player with potential for a relatively low fee, who after time to adapt to our system and improve certain aspects can play a role in our team and becomes good enough to start for ESL sides a la Caceido, Mane, Wijnaldum, Mahrez, not to mention all the ESL cast offs like Rice, Palmer, Rogers etc

Shitstain of a human being. Pure cuckold to Perez, Laporta etc.

Romano loves to do the tapping up for the big sides. Absolute parasite.

Whatever we sell him for minus £24m as the remaining amortised value (£40m/5 x 2 seasons of amortisation) is what we would have to spend. So £75m would give us £51m profit (crudely). How we spend it via fees, wages, bonuses comes down to who/how many we want.

I do not want to sell him, I want to build on the foundations we have.

Thought the reports at the time were that we wanted both. Can't really remember though.

Yeah, although not sure if that was the reason. Most reports I've read are that Wilson's injury made us have a rethink of our priorities, combined with us being urged to 'go big' by PIF before signing Isak.

Not going to be able to replace what he does defensively. But surely we could get in a very good RB at half the price who is more the finished product in the offensive part of the game. Dont have to be as young either. No rule that says we have to replace the player like for like. If we also get in a fast RCB we wont miss his speed that much. For sure understand that people dont want to let go of him. But I do think the potential money we could get from a sale could help us build a stronger squad overall, especially in the short term.

Was about to ask. Must’ve passed the test last time we were in for him. How’s his English?

I don’t want him sold. Hypothetically though, if we got as much as say 80m for him. Wouldn’t this more or less mean that we would be able to buy a replacement for say 30-40m and then be able to sign two 40m players on top of that when you consider PSR? Perhaps not if we include wages for the other two players I guess.