All Activity

Grealish would be a terrible signing. Loan or permanent. He'd do well to move abroad and try and extend his career as I think it's done in the PL. The City move killed it.

I was talking in terms of whole career, not one mistake.

If it's real not saying it is but might be a change of tact from the club as can't buy enough players to bolster the squad to compete in all competitions. While loans aren't what we do it may be an idea worth exploring to help the squad. Don't think many of us have been against the idea of the odd loan but can see why Howe isn't keen historically.

Getting £30m for Bellingham, if they then signed Longstaff and Hackney for say £35m combined, they’d be so far better off

Brescia gone bust it would appear.

Wish I was him

We'll only do loan deals if they're obligations/options to buy of players we really want. Eddie has been quoted in saying this in the past that they're only done as a means to sign players we want permanently. I don't think we will ever sign a high wage, high age player on a short term loan deal no matter how much people see the logic in it or suggest it. It's just not the way Eddie and the club wants to operate, even if it leaves us short. I tend to agree with it tbh.

Think Man City know that any deal and they’ll probably have to cover £150k-£200k of his wages (if he’s on £300k). He’s been told to go and won’t be in USA. So it’s best interest for them to just take any offer going early doors instead of prolonging it to end of August for the sake of saving like £2m in wages.

Shilton was dogshit tbf and he’s a bigoted cunt to boot. Got outjumped by an Argentinian midget.

True but we most definately do do loans.

He just said what everyone would be saying behind closed doors Almiron was a joke at that point, then turned clinical on back of it.

Completely different situations aren’t they. Targett when we were desperate, Hall because we couldn’t afford to buy him at the time.

Strange Dortmund have gone for Bellingham as I read on RTG just before their play off win that he’d only had ten good games for them. They’re going down regardless. Straight down with no drama, no fuss. It’ll be nine months where no one even registers their presence. The PL has gotten immeasurably better since they were last here and they don’t have anything like the tools needed to even compete for a spot between 15th and 17th.

It's a bit dating the guy we told Miggy not to worry about but if he can find his Villa form and we're not paying his wages fuck it.

Apart from Hall and Targett you mean?

Tried to sign Jesse Lingard on loan.

Just keep giving him 1 year contracts until he's 60 imo

And Pickford's better than Shilton.

We don’t do loan deals.

Id take Grealish. But city would have to pay half or ideally 2 thirds of his wages over a season long loan with an option to buy (not an ogligation). Id love to see what Howe could do with him tbh.

“This chart confirms all my priors” - everyone

There's no issue with talent. He'd be comfortably one of our best players in possession, he could play in a few positions and I don't think he's too old at all. I just don't see how the finances work, unless City think loaning him out to a PL club will re-ignite his value, in the same way Villa did with Rashford but again, City would likely have to pay half the wages too. It just sounds like rubbish paper talk. There's loads of our lads who will know Grealish pretty well, Trippier, Pope, Wilson, Burn, Tino, Hall for example. If his attitude ain't right, then there won't be any hiding it. We know that Howe is meticulous on character, so if he did want him, it wouldn't be an issue. But yes, complete made up nonsense is the likely situation. He'll end up on loan to Arsenal or somewhere.

I'll give it a shot. Sleep on the top bunk though.

Yes

Best CB we’ve had?