Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Dr Venkman

    João Pedro

    Yeah I’ll rephrase that. I don’t see why we should have to sell anyone effective.
  3. Displayname

    João Pedro

    I mean if someone can do it its Bruno and Tonali. Both are at the top of distance covered stats. Never stops running(well if you can call what Bruno does running).
  4. Fak

    Tino Livramento

    He's going nowhere man.
  5. City won’t go to the fee we’re after imo. Don’t think this happens.
  6. Ter Stegen would be a Trippier like signing where we would all experience what it's like to actually have an elite player in a position we never have.
  7. nemtizz

    João Pedro

    Think no matter what combo you go with our midfield will struggle in a 2.
  8. It’s the only way spending £50m+ on JP makes sense. JP best position is at 10/second striker. Why would you spend so much money on him and play him in a position that’s not his best? It also puts the Cunha links into context.
  9. Kevin Keegan and Les Lerdinand
  10. Kimbo

    João Pedro

    He’s been getting a lot of negative press for this but to me it sounds like a reasonable thing to do.
  11. Welcome to Chelsea PLC.
  12. Still never worked out what he was pointing at there.
  13. KingArthur

    João Pedro

    I dont believe a second that Howe changes his system.
  14. Tried to sign him before if memory serves.
  15. Remember when tapping up wasn’t allowed? Now you have this pizza shagger doing it in plain sight for a massive audience.
  16. About £25m left on his book value. So that would be a £55m profit. For the next season we also get rid of his £2,6m yearly wage and £8m in amortization. Thats means a wiggle room of £65m looking from the perspective of the next season alone. Lets say we split that in £40m in amortization and £25m in contract costs for new arrivals. £40m in amortization = £200m in transfer cost.. Essentially means that we wouldn't have to worry about PSR at all this season atleast.
  17. KingArthur

    João Pedro

    Because 120m is most of our budget, and we need more than 2.
  18. Ashley17

    João Pedro

    I'm not keen on him but I suppose he did thump Van Hecke in training, so I'm warming to the idea.
  19. High Five o

    João Pedro

    We went for Isak instead if I remember correctly.
  20. No, I'm generalizing. He'd have improved most top clubs in England last year had he been sold in the summer. Either way, I'm talking about the idea of signing a player with potential for a relatively low fee, who after time to adapt to our system and improve certain aspects can play a role in our team and becomes good enough to start for ESL sides a la Caceido, Mane, Wijnaldum, Mahrez, not to mention all the ESL cast offs like Rice, Palmer, Rogers etc
  21. Shitstain of a human being. Pure cuckold to Perez, Laporta etc.
  22. Romano loves to do the tapping up for the big sides. Absolute parasite.
  23. Whatever we sell him for minus £24m as the remaining amortised value (£40m/5 x 2 seasons of amortisation) is what we would have to spend. So £75m would give us £51m profit (crudely). How we spend it via fees, wages, bonuses comes down to who/how many we want.
  24. Kanj

    Tino Livramento

    I do not want to sell him, I want to build on the foundations we have.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...