BlueStar

Possibly Giggs but a demoralising way of looking at things from Reddit.

Let's get to 3 first

Dubravka's all purple strip and big white gloves made him look like Waluigi. The sole highlight.

Surely Marriner can't ref the Seagulls? Nautical bias.

Jesus wept. That's absolutely mental from whoever runs that cafe. The cheery Alan Partridge reporting of it isn't exactly great either! "Today on Midmorning Matters, rape - is it funny?"

Aye, until it's Ashley being transferred from ICU to the morgue it's irrelevant.

Got a name like a champman regen. Hope we're also in for Nigel Fernandez and Trevor Ronaldo.

Struggling. Tim Wiese, George Weah, Ian Wright... Wonaldo, Wooney..

url is invalid, you can't have a slash before the .com.

The Ian Wright sees a ghost reference

What the fuck is going on? Just got off the metro and into a pub saw 1-0, was still trying to process that when the second went in and the place went crackers.

MUFC: De Gea, Young, Bailly, Smalling, Shaw, McTominay, Matic, Pogba, Rashford, Lukaku, Martial Subs: Romero, Lindelof, Sanchez, Mata, Pereira, Fred, Fellaini NUFC: Dubravka, Manquillo, Lascelles, Fernandez, Yedlin, Ritchie, Shelvey, Diame, Kenedy, Perez, Muto. Subs: Darlow, Schar, Clark, Hayden, Murphy, Atsu, Joselu Referee: Anthony Taylor (Cheshire) Attendance: Current score: 2-2 Kenedy Muto Mata Martial Sanchez Booked: Sent off: Television coverage: BT Sport Radio coverage: BBC Radio 5 Live, BBC Radio Newcastle. Online radio coverage in the UK: www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/console/bbc_radio_five_live/. Online radio coverage outside the UK: https://www.nufc.co.uk/liveaudio.html PLEASE DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES DISCUSS, REQUEST OR PROVIDE LINKS TO ILLEGAL MATCH STREAMS. IF YOU DO, YOU WILL BE BANNED. See www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php?topic=19161.0 for more information.

Struggled to get a mate to use my ticket for free a few times recently, can't even find anyone arsed about watching this one in the pub.

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. There's saying you're going to let the process run its course and not condemn the player before a conviction, and then there's saying "We don't care if he might have raped someone, it was 10 years ago anyway and he's great." That's how you see it! Which clearly is bollocks. If anything, that statement is implicitly saying that it was not during his time at Juventus, and therefore allowing themselves the opportunity to distance themselves from whatever outcome of a trial. Amatures think a like, deary me (Maybe you're spending too much time together). Eh? They're explicit that it's not that they're saying they don't believe the allegations, they're saying that events of ten years ago won't change their opinion of him. Another one! No, you're wrong! They used the word 'allegedly', so why on earth should they, at this moment of time, change their opinion of him? They're saying the alleged events don't change their opinion of him. Not sure what's hard to understand like, tweets aren't that long. It's rightly been absolutely panned from all quarters, not sure why you're getting so upset and offended on their behalf. Snowflake culture.

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. There's saying you're going to let the process run its course and not condemn the player before a conviction, and then there's saying "We don't care if he might have raped someone, it was 10 years ago anyway and he's great." That's how you see it! Which clearly is bollocks. If anything, that statement is implicitly saying that it was not during his time at Juventus, and therefore allowing themselves the opportunity to distance themselves from whatever outcome of a trial. Amatures think a like, deary me (Maybe you're spending too much time together). Eh? They're explicit that it's not that they're saying they don't believe the allegations, they're saying that events of ten years ago won't change their opinion of him.

Is it really a time for 'backing' or not backing a player though? When he's accused of rape? It's nothing to do with whether he's a good professional or turns up early for training. Just seems in really bad taste to me. That's not their concern, looking after their asset (legally) is. I wish her the best and I hope she receives what is just, and I have no sympathy for Ronaldo whatever happens; but, if I was a director at Juventus, and I haven't seen any information that is deemed 'credible' by them, I'd be backing the player - or to be more precise, I'd be backing their own interest. There's saying you're going to let the process run its course and not condemn the player before a conviction, and then there's saying "We don't care if he might have raped someone, it was 10 years ago anyway and he's great."

You'd think, but we've been saying this since Keegan left.

Consortium with War and Famine.

he'd be a case for dark justice how can a 64 year old man be so creepy and bitter and hateful Wasn't there a good handfull of people on that site done for noncing?...Dangermows has to be seriously questioned too..his responses are creepy as fuck There was a guy who posted with his real name as his username and his real pic as his avatar who was caught in a Dark Justice sting. He'd previously had the piss taken out of him on RTG for being way to enthusiastic about how good Primark clothes made his teenage daughters look. Can't find the thread now.

He is what he is, a £5m striker in a league where he's playing against £10m-£50m defenders. Not his fault I guess.

Been following this on Reddit. If some of the statement from Ronaldo (she said no and stop several times) are as verifiable as is claimed I can't see how it's possible he could stay out of jail, no matter how much cash he has for lawyers.

Liked the chant of "You can stick your fucking badges, stick your fucking badges, stick your fucking badges up your arse! (And your pen!)"