Leazes1986

The only one Roeder mentioned going out on loan for the season is Krul. It's probably more likely that Huntington might go out on loan for half a season, and Edgar for the other half. I would like to see Carroll loaned out for the season though. Only heard good things about him. He's only 18 isn't he? Maybe a season in League one then if he does the business hopefully someone in the Championship will take him for another year. Very positive stuff from that article though and i agree with Roeder.

Why i ask? I know some of you don't have any faith in him whatsoever. I actually do and am prepared to give him another season. I didn't make this thread for an argument for or against Roeder though. This is more to do with Freddy Shepherd. Do any of you have faith in the fat man sacking him then actually appointing the right man and if you do on what basis? I certainly don't have any faith in him appointing the right manager whatsoever. How many managers are gonna look at the Newcastle job as an attractive job if Roeder was sacked after yet another manager was sacked in such a short space of time? The more managers we go through the less attractive the job gets. I can't see many managers who is in a job now wanting to leave their job where they are comfortable for this job where they know if they don't have us in the top 6 in the space of 12-18 months then they will probably be out of a job. The only kind of manager we are likely to be able to attract is one who isn't having the best of times at his own club and knows he has nothing to lose (remember Souness). The simple fact is we will never be able to attract a top manager now until we have some stability. Chopping and changing the manager all of the time isn't gonna give us that. Roeder was brought in to give us that but we need to give him another year at the least because even if he doesn't take us as high as where we want to be, it might be better for the club in the long run. This chairman cannot be trusted to sack another manager after such a short space of time and appoint the right man. Its all well and good people saying they don't want Roeder as manager but getting rid of him when theres nobody out there is just stupid. Thoughts?

Fuck knows if this interview will really happen but its pointless people asking questions like some of them in the thread. As if the lads gonna ask him stuff like why don't you leave.

The most annoying thing for me (which was obvious would happen anyway) is that everyone was in agreement that Fat Fred was the big problem and people started to voice what they thought of him, then as soon as the team started picking up a bit everyone shut up and forgot all about it. If we lose another couple of games then everyone will be in Shepherds back again. Why did people even get of his back in the first place?

As much as i love Martins i would pick Rooney. He could go on to be an all time great he is that good. Martins has the potential to be one of the best strikers in the world if he works on his all around game, but Rooney has the ability to be one of the very best there has been. He doesn't get enough goals at the minute but he is such a clever player, and another key point is he has proven to have a good partnership alongside Owen.

The show isn't half as good without Gatesy. Its a sad thing to say but if i could have picked one of them to leave out of the 3 of them then it wouldn't have been Malcolm.

I bet the little fat twat still gets stick to this day for it. I've never went to watch Blyth Spartans like but he obviously lives locally and i don't think everyone will be forgiving with him.

I was speechless for a minute there until i realised you were a Villa fan. He scored 2 past us in 1996 and played a massive part in us blowing the title and he seemed pretty happy about it as well the cunt.

I would be lying if i said i held these two in high regard http://www.icons.com/images/merch/DHSP1new.jpg http://www.sporting-heroes.net/files_football/FENTON_Graham_19960817_SF_L.jpg

http://www.nufc.com/2006-07images/mag214_cover.jpg Looks like the Chronicle printed parts of the interview the other day judging by the quote on the front of it like but it should be an interesting read. Haven't heard much from him for a while. Will definitely be buying (not that i don't buy it anyway like).

Huntington more than any of our other youngsters needs to be loaned out imo. He could well turn out to be a very good defender but he just strikes me as someone who needs a good kicking in a league or two below. If we can get him toughened up then we might have a very good defender on our hands. I wouldn't be sad to see Bramble, Ramage and Moore all go though. They are liability's. Get a new left back in and hopefully Gooch turns out to be good enough to sign. Don't think he will cost a fortune either. If we can do that plus get another centre back in as well (Woodgate in an ideal world although i very much doubt it will happen) then we won't miss the 3 donkeys thats for sure plus we'd have a left back who is reliable which means we won't need Huntington next season.

I would like to see Carroll at some point but i think we should start with Martins and Dyer. Not many people get past Woodgate, and i don't think Sibierski or Carroll would get any change of him. At least with Martins and Dyer they have pace which is always a danger. Woody has plenty of pace himself of course.

Not until the game after Boro.

I'd go along with that team but only if N'Zogbia is definitely ready to start.

Its Parkers fault that we blew the 12 point lead in 96 tbh.

his £40k bonus for every one of 'his' academy plsyers making first team wouldnt have anything to do with this owuld it...... he seems to prefer playing 'his' academy players rather than those who are not. pattinson ahead of o'brien the obvious example Ramage and Taylor aren't his academy players yet he plays them ahead of Huntington and Edgar. (rightly so in Taylors case). I haven't got a clue about any bonuses Roeder gets for players making the first team, but your argument of him playing Pattison ahead of O'Brien because of any bonuses he might get are wrong because surely it would have only been a one of bonus.

Theres no chance of Owen going anywhere this summer.

Charlton cos the West Ham fans are cunts.

Ah reet. Well i agree then Duff has been the biggest dissapoinment. Most of the time eh has been very ordinary or poor. On form he's a class act. We shouldn't give up on him though. Give him next season. Look at the turnaround Nicky Butt has made. Luque has been awful and won't come good cos he doesn't even put the effort in. Duff may well still come good and its worth giving him more time cos if he does his the form he is capable of he will be one hell of a player for us.

This is gonna turn into a first choice line up thread if we're not careful.

Can't believe some of the stick he gets. He would be one of the first names on the team sheet for me now. He's earned it. IMO anyway.

People are being too harsh on Duff the neet imo. He was one of our more lively players. I think a few people are almost willing him to play bad now. He's been a big disappointment so far, but tonight he wasn't our worst player. I don't know why people are trying to look for negatives here. It wasn't a very good performance by any means but just look at the thread title. We're through and thats what amtters at the end of the day.

If Luque scored a hat-trick tonight it wouldn't prove anything really as far as i'm concerned. He's still done fuck all against anyone decent he's came up against. He's a lazy waster.

Well if Luque doesn't bother his arse then at least we should get to see Carroll for a good half an hour. Would be nice to see Carroll knock a goal in.

Would be the last player i would sell.