Jump to content

HawK

Member
  • Posts

    6,887
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by HawK

  1. Why is it that they are all called Sammy, or a derivative thereof
  2. HawK

    Sunderland

    All of the BBC historical sex abuse cases enough for you? Not as if they've been low profile or anything. Seems your knowledge of the criminal justice system is as comprehensive as your knowledge of football. Or you're just quite thick (whoever you are) and don't understand the discussion. One person's word against another securing a conviction independent of witnesses and other evidence. No? Exactly. Pipe down. You are correct in saying one persons word against another will not secure a conviction, there will need to be other 'evidence' to support the claims of one more than the other. For example, in the Johnson case - if SAFC turned up and said he didn't turn up at the ground until 18:20, that would support the girl and possibly lead to a conviction It doesn't necessarily have to be DNA or fingerprint evidence, it could just be one person having the more believable version of events with other circumstances showing that they are more likely to be telling the truth than the other. I think people are misinterpreting what you are saying. So circumstantial evidence is admissible in court now? Where did I say that like? There?
  3. I think it's generally inferred that'd we'd be in this 'constellation of teams' as well, like, regardless of circumstance.
  4. HawK

    Sunderland

    All of the BBC historical sex abuse cases enough for you? Not as if they've been low profile or anything. Seems your knowledge of the criminal justice system is as comprehensive as your knowledge of football. Or you're just quite thick (whoever you are) and don't understand the discussion. One person's word against another securing a conviction independent of witnesses and other evidence. No? Exactly. Pipe down. You are correct in saying one persons word against another will not secure a conviction, there will need to be other 'evidence' to support the claims of one more than the other. For example, in the Johnson case - if SAFC turned up and said he didn't turn up at the ground until 18:20, that would support the girl and possibly lead to a conviction It doesn't necessarily have to be DNA or fingerprint evidence, it could just be one person having the more believable version of events with other circumstances showing that they are more likely to be telling the truth than the other. I think people are misinterpreting what you are saying. So circumstantial evidence is admissible in court now?
  5. HawK

    Florian Thauvin

    Aye. He's still a marginally better poster than you though. ffs
  6. Jonjo Shelveyyyyyy He can really spot a pass Jonjo Shelveyyyyy And he's not very fast Jonjo Shelveyyyyy He's like Beckham with no hair Jonjo Shelveyyyyy He's on the pitch but i don't know where!
  7. You surely can't be pining to watch us get raped again ? I am glad for the rest i kinda want to get it all ova and done with to be honest I'm not in the Adam Johnson thread again am I ?
  8. HawK

    Sunderland

    Or the Philippines Or Rotherham then.
  9. HawK

    Florian Thauvin

    Tore Northampton a third arsehole. Send him to Coventry to set up Arma for some more goals to toughen him up a bit.
  10. HawK

    Florian Thauvin

    Every single perfume guy I've met in any nightclub has been black and wore a bow tie
  11. HawK

    Relegationometer

    http://i512.photobucket.com/albums/t322/frednut/dcv3oi.gif The TONGUE. Cannot unsee... :'( :'(
  12. HawK

    Andros Townsend

    Can safely say we can forget about LW as being an issue, it's probably one of the strongest parts of our team now to be fair, along with RB/RW.
  13. HawK

    Steve McClaren

    The Universal Scale of Unimaginable Arrogance
  14. HawK

    Florian Thauvin

    People probably just smiled as they silently thought he looked like the guy they'd bumped into him in the nightclub toilets the previous weekend who offered them some Hugo Boss.
  15. Irks you a bit to have a player who actually gives a shit for a change? We haven't had that since Chris Hughton was manager.
  16. HawK

    Sunderland

    I think there's more mileage in Stifler yet, actually.
  17. HawK

    Shola Ameobi

    for Fleetwood, ffs.
  18. HawK

    Graham Carr

    Look, you're s***. anita is a ok, he's better than colback at literally everything for example so he's not the priority for getting rid There's definitely a good player in there. At the very least there is a player in there that is a more than adequate squad member in our current situation. He's the least of our problems. Personally don't think there's space for anyone else in there. Except maybe Mugsy Bogues, and he might not be best to help our situation tbh.
  19. Just need to offer Klopp a Red Bull.
×
×
  • Create New...