Nate

Arsenal 1-1 Bolton. 15 minutes to go.

He got a premiership recored tbh.. I wouldve kept him with us,at least he is better then Ameobi and Rossi.. Any c**t woudl be better than that pile of shite Ameobi. And Rossi? He'll be a good player in a few years. Us getting him when we did, then not using him properly, just highlighted what an idiot Roeder is. Can't agree more.. chopra is not and will never be a prtemiership quality forward. Huh? Neither of them were saying he was. if he's not a prem player why was roeder an idiot for letting him go He said Roeder was an idiot for bringing in Rossi when he did and then not using him properly.

He got a premiership recored tbh.. I wouldve kept him with us,at least he is better then Ameobi and Rossi.. Any c**t woudl be better than that pile of shite Ameobi. And Rossi? He'll be a good player in a few years. Us getting him when we did, then not using him properly, just highlighted what an idiot Roeder is. Can't agree more.. chopra is not and will never be a prtemiership quality forward. Huh? Neither of them were saying he was.

Bristol C 0-2 Middlesbrough Tottenham 1-0 Southend I see Montella scored again.

Luton 0-4 Blackburn. FT. Birmingham 0-1 Reading Barnet 0-0 Plymouth Blackpool 0-0 Norwich Bristol C 0-1 Middlesbrough Crystal Palace 0-0 Preston Derby 0-0 Bristol Rovers Fulham 1-0 Stoke Ipswich 0-0 Swansea Tottenham 0-0 Southend West Ham 0-0 Watford

You really think he would, wouldn't you? Especially after the 'pole position' comments last time around.

Neill is equally competent playing centre-half. West Ham have now bought Callum Davenport and had two bids for Matthew Upson rejected; Ferdinand is virtually guarenteed to leave before February.

We've won it 2 times, without killing anyone... or something.

Anton Ferdiand would have to be one of the worse signings we could make. He is overrated, overpriced, inexperienced and supposedly has an awful attitude to match his off-field behaviour... not to mention he's not actually much of a defender. No thanks.

http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=159744.msg2581242#msg2581242

I think it would be a better deal if we were spending £5m on him, then he could gradually takeover from Butt and we'd actually be gaining something long-term from giving him chances in the first team. I see no value in taking a young player on loan as cover, look what happened with Rossi.

He would be a good permanent signing, but why would we even consider taking him on loan? Butt is doing well in his role for now, are we supposed to drop him to give a Chelsea player some first team experience?

Add Eriksson and Shearer.

What? All the interest in Reo-Coker started in the Summer, after he was one of the players of the season last year..

I like Emre, but we do need at least one central midfielder to scores goals and that certainly isn't going to be Butt. Dyer seems to have significantly improved infront of goal, so i'd probaly play him ahead of the Turk, for now. No need to sell him though, i think we're relatively strong in the position with Butt, Parker, Dyer and Emre to chose from. I would look to exchange Parker for a more attacking player, if anything, but it can't be a priority in this window.

diarra from chelsea, next makelele, have i spelled those both wrong, bah, its sunday If he's the next Makalele, why the F*** would Chelsea sell him? They're not gonna. Mourinho loves him. He is Makelele's replacement. Shame that, cos i would have loved him hear next season to replace Butt, who's legs will be going by then. Realistically speaking. Why do you keep saying Butt's legs will be going next season? He's only 31, Makelele is 33 and still has a season in him.

Same here. Mourinho really needs to win the Champions League again to justify the hype surrounding him, he's been found wanting tactically several times in the competition. I have little doubt, with Chelsea's funds at his disposal, Hiddink would obtain it within 3 seasons.

It could go two ways.. a) SWP recaptures his Man City form playing week in, week out, and we have one of the best wingers in the league on our books. b) He's another Duff: dissapointing and past his best, whilst having a detrimental effect on the development of our brightest prospect in the repsective position. It's probaly worth a gamble to take him on loan, although that looks unlikely with West Ham offering cash.

1-3. Johnson pulls one back.

Undoubtedly. One of the few attainable, Premiership managers i wouldn't have minded seeing here when Souness went.

The sad thing is, if Curbishley was actually stupid enough to offer £10m for Parker, it would be rejected.

Even if he had suffered a blood clot, i can't think of career ending condition it would lead to...?

Is the right word, unprofessional beyond belief. Very worrying signs that Roeder would rather keep on an utterly inept player (who has ultimately lost us the victory), before bringing on one he holds a personal grudge against, too.

Tevez & Mascherano? Flops perhaps, but West Ham haven't lost any money on them, have they? Faye should probaly be up there alongside Dowie's other disasterous signings.

None of the above.