Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I really don't understand why they are doing this, if they want to replace him remove him now, not wait until the replacement says yes.

 

If they have no faith in him, then he's gone anyway, what harm would it do for the backroom staff to manage the next game or two.

 

At least its clean then when talking to his potential replacements.

 

This situation  does nothing but harm to Newcastle's reputation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

SSN jumped the gun really. They said their sources said McClaren set to be sacked and will not be in charge against Leicester. Now it says 'unlikely' to be in charge.

 

Update at 4. No idea what happened to that supposed meeting between McClaren and Charnley after training since McClaren has gone home. Maybe he was informed already but club to release statement today? His face when he left was liked a man who just lost his job though. A 11.00 pm statement from the club?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I really don't understand why they are doing this, if they want to replace him remove him now, not wait until the replacement says yes.

 

If they have no faith in him, then he's gone anyway, what harm would it do for the backroom staff to manage the next game or two.

 

At least its clean then when talking to his potential replacements.

 

This situation  does nothing but harm to Newcastle's reputation.

 

Was just about to post something similar. 

 

Absolutely no point in keeping him on.  In the long run, it seems more harmful than finally settling for our 3rd, 4th, 10th choice replacement. 

 

He's not going to be focusing on his job.  I mean, he hasn't done that for a while, anyway.  The fans are going to grow more and more restless.  Plus the players are going to be even more demotivated, if that is actually possible.

 

They've finally come to the conclusion that he is shit and he has to go.  So why is he still in charge?  Are they honestly considering leaving him as coach, should we fail to get Benitez, Moyes, Rodgers etc..........

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would they wait all this time and then sack him before Rafa's signed? It's stupid, but it's not unexpected or any reason to panic.

 

It's as if they can only do one thing at a time, they're incompetent morons.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if Rafa doesn't sign, what then?  We go to plan B? 

 

If they're going to get rid of McClaren, they might as well do it now.  If they think, like the rest of us, that he isn't good enough.  Then they should be putting a caretaker in charge and getting shot of him.  There is literally no point in him carrying on. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...