midds Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 No reason whatsoever why Taylor should come back in after that. Wouldn't rule it out though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamesyJazz Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Keep. Enrique is a decent efficient old style full back,ok his passing is a tad susspect but that can be worked on.He's a stopper and a decent dead ball taker from what I've heard. Taylor,heart in the right place,still has those Bramblesque moments.Then again with a more robust midfield would the defence be under as much pressure? I've stated before that if Colcocini was playin for Manure or another top 3 club that the fickle media scum would be masturbating over his every move.Jeeeeez the guy is sheer class,the best since we had a fitish young Woodgate ffs.Credit where credit is due ok. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzza Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 I didn't think Coloccini played that well today, he was hesitatnt a lot of times and got away with a few bad attempts at tackles when their attackers got past him. bassong was really good, covered for the other players and was solid all the time, really liked him, looks very fast aswell!! I would keep this back line until they do something wrong, that's the way it should be... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted November 22, 2008 Share Posted November 22, 2008 Coloccini looks classy but also like he's trying to play a card he hasn't been dealt when partnering Taylor. Alongside Taylor he can play his natural game with assurance Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewellander Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I'd like to see Kinnear keep this back four in place. If we can bring in another LB in the transfer window, I would be happy with that, though. I'm happy with Enrique to a point, but I'm unsure that we can't do better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
junkhead Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 absolutely, Bassong and Enrique must remain in the 1st eleven after this performance.. I'm no fan of Taylor, but I consider him better than Bassong and Cacapa and I think he needs a couple of games on the subs' bench, just to remind him that he ain't Maldini.. yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 This is the same defence that couldn't defend for their lives against Wigan, no? Anyway I'd play: Taylor Colo Beye Bassong Taylor is better going forward than Bye where as Bassong is stronger down the left than Enrique. That back four has height, pace and strength and in Colo and Beye leadership. Having said all that it doesn't really matter who plays there we'll still concede goals unless our tactics change and we somehow find a good balance in midfield which is the weakest area of our team by far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 absolutely, Bassong and Enrique must remain in the 1st eleven after this performance.. I'm no fan of Taylor, but I consider him better than Bassong and Cacapa and I think he needs a couple of games on the subs' bench, just to remind him that he ain't Maldini.. yet. how can people say Taylor is better than Bassong? He's had 3 games at CB now and done absolutely nowt wrong. He's younger than Taylor and looks so much more disciplined and capable Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 This is the same defence that couldn't defend for their lives against Wigan, no? Anyway I'd play: Taylor Colo Beye Bassong Taylor is better going forward than Bye where as Bassong is stronger down the left than Enrique. That back four has height, pace and strength and in Colo and Beye leadership. Having said all that it doesn't really matter who plays there we'll still concede goals unless our tactics change and we somehow find a good balance in midfield which is the weakest area of our team by far. Yet another person missing my point. They've shown yesterday that they CAN perform, and against a team bang in form. I don't see why we should be chopping and changing it every week. Stick with them and let them develop an understanding. If Bassong had a mare at LB then would you want him out of the team again? Ad infinitum. We ought to pick our best back four - with everyone in their natural positions - and stick with it IMO. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 This is the same defence that couldn't defend for their lives against Wigan, no? Anyway I'd play: Taylor Colo Beye Bassong Taylor is better going forward than Bye where as Bassong is stronger down the left than Enrique. That back four has height, pace and strength and in Colo and Beye leadership. Having said all that it doesn't really matter who plays there we'll still concede goals unless our tactics change and we somehow find a good balance in midfield which is the weakest area of our team by far. Yet another person missing my point. They've shown yesterday that they CAN perform, and against a team bang in form. I don't see why we should be chopping and changing it every week. Stick with them and let them develop an understanding. If Bassong had a mare at LB then would you want him out of the team again? Ad infinitum. We ought to pick our best back four - with everyone in their natural positions - and stick with it IMO. I agree 100% that the back four should be the same week in week out, I just don't think Enrique at LB and Beye at RB in particular give us great attacking options which for my money is the best way to defend, i.e. from the front. The Chelsea match saw 10-11 men behind the ball whenever they were on it so not surprisingly the defence did well - all that cover and protection would help any under fire defence. We shouldn't use that one match in any way to justify the current back-four though as they were shite against Wigan, especially at RB and LB. Hence my choice of Taylor at RB and Bassong at LB who hase the athleticism and pace to get forward from there while also being a competent defender. Enrique rarely passes the half-way line and that doesn't helpe neither the defence or the attack. On the other flank I think Beye is an excellent defender but going forward isn't the best. He isn't aggressive enough whereas Taylor is. Furthermore from yesterday's evidence a lot of Beye's best work came in the centre of defence covering for Colo or Bassong, he's a cool head in there and reads play well. I'd play him there alongside Colo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 If Taylor walks straight back in then Kinnear is a c**t, fact. I concur. Back four were excellent yesterday, Coloccini was world class and Bassong was excellent. As someone said Enrique was cracking defensively but distribution continued to be poor and Beye was Beye. We looked very solid, Chelsea struggled to break us down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 If Taylor walks straight back in then Kinnear is a c**t, fact. I concur. Back four were excellent yesterday, Coloccini was world class and Bassong was excellent. As someone said Enrique was cracking defensively but distribution continued to be poor and Beye was Beye. We looked very solid, Chelsea struggled to break us down. One game! That same back-four were awful at home to Wigan and do not fill me with any confidence that such performances can be repeated on a consistent basis, mainly due to the tactics, selection and more significantly the midfield admittedly than the defence itself. By the same token surely the starting 11 who performed so well, should be kept for the next match? Ye I bet if I started a thread in the same vein as this one many would have Duff and Butt in particular nowhere near the bench never mind the starting 11. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 If Taylor walks straight back in then Kinnear is a c**t, fact. I concur. Back four were excellent yesterday, Coloccini was world class and Bassong was excellent. As someone said Enrique was cracking defensively but distribution continued to be poor and Beye was Beye. We looked very solid, Chelsea struggled to break us down. One game! That same back-four were awful at home to Wigan and do not fill me with any confidence that such performances can be repeated on a consistent basis, mainly due to the tactics, selection and more significantly the midfield admittedly than the defence itself. They weren't though were they? Not defensively at least. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Howaythetoon Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 If Taylor walks straight back in then Kinnear is a c**t, fact. I concur. Back four were excellent yesterday, Coloccini was world class and Bassong was excellent. As someone said Enrique was cracking defensively but distribution continued to be poor and Beye was Beye. We looked very solid, Chelsea struggled to break us down. One game! That same back-four were awful at home to Wigan and do not fill me with any confidence that such performances can be repeated on a consistent basis, mainly due to the tactics, selection and more significantly the midfield admittedly than the defence itself. They weren't though were they? Not defensively at least. I thought they were. Colo had a mare against Wigan as did Enrique. Beye wasn't his best and Bassong looked shakey although of the 4 he played the best I thought. Shay was also poor that game too. This is my main point however, they were not helped by that god damn awful lineup in midfield that fucks up both ends of the pitch for us and is the one area that needs completely rewritten and changed and sooner rather than later because no matter who plays in defence we'll still leak goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 This is the same defence that couldn't defend for their lives against Wigan, no? Anyway I'd play: Taylor Colo Beye Bassong Taylor is better going forward than Bye where as Bassong is stronger down the left than Enrique. That back four has height, pace and strength and in Colo and Beye leadership. Having said all that it doesn't really matter who plays there we'll still concede goals unless our tactics change and we somehow find a good balance in midfield which is the weakest area of our team by far. Yet another person missing my point. They've shown yesterday that they CAN perform, and against a team bang in form. I don't see why we should be chopping and changing it every week. Stick with them and let them develop an understanding. If Bassong had a mare at LB then would you want him out of the team again? Ad infinitum. We ought to pick our best back four - with everyone in their natural positions - and stick with it IMO. I agree 100% that the back four should be the same week in week out, I just don't think Enrique at LB and Beye at RB in particular give us great attacking options which for my money is the best way to defend, i.e. from the front. The Chelsea match saw 10-11 men behind the ball whenever they were on it so not surprisingly the defence did well - all that cover and protection would help any under fire defence. We shouldn't use that one match in any way to justify the current back-four though as they were shite against Wigan, especially at RB and LB. Hence my choice of Taylor at RB and Bassong at LB who hase the athleticism and pace to get forward from there while also being a competent defender. Enrique rarely passes the half-way line and that doesn't helpe neither the defence or the attack. On the other flank I think Beye is an excellent defender but going forward isn't the best. He isn't aggressive enough whereas Taylor is. Furthermore from yesterday's evidence a lot of Beye's best work came in the centre of defence covering for Colo or Bassong, he's a cool head in there and reads play well. I'd play him there alongside Colo. So you'd play 3 players out of position, basically? Fantastic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CaPiTaL cHaP Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 If Taylor walks straight back in then Kinnear is a c**t, fact. I concur. Back four were excellent yesterday, Coloccini was world class and Bassong was excellent. As someone said Enrique was cracking defensively but distribution continued to be poor and Beye was Beye. We looked very solid, Chelsea struggled to break us down. One game! That same back-four were awful at home to Wigan and do not fill me with any confidence that such performances can be repeated on a consistent basis, mainly due to the tactics, selection and more significantly the midfield admittedly than the defence itself. They weren't though were they? Not defensively at least. I thought they were. Colo had a mare against Wigan as did Enrique. Beye wasn't his best and Bassong looked shakey although of the 4 he played the best I thought. Shay was also poor that game too. This is my main point however, they were not helped by that god damn awful lineup in midfield that f***s up both ends of the pitch for us and is the one area that needs completely rewritten and changed and sooner rather than later because no matter who plays in defence we'll still leak goals. Don't really get your logic tbh. Beye lacks the power to play in the centre and Taylor lacks the ability on the ball to play RB. I do agree that neither of our FB's are great on the ball but they can both defend, start from there i reckon. Enrique is the kind of player that needs to be developed, no one should expect him to be really good for another 2/3 years. He's the kind of player smaller clubs buy, develop and then sell on and posters on here would be moaning that we never spot players with potential. I'd just stick with him, i think he's got enough about him to come good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 It's been a pleasant change to read positive views about our defence whatever some people on here might think. To hold out against Chelsea with almost the entire game being played in our half takes courage, organsation and no little skill. Some of the better journos lavished praise on Colo, Bassong and Beye in particular and they earned it. Let's give them some credit for a change, it's not often the defence gets much after all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobby Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 sell taylor keep the five of Given, Beye, Coloccini, Bassong, Enrique Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 sell taylor keep the five of Given, Beye, Coloccini, Bassong, Enrique I would only sell Taylor if we get in two more centre backs. Might not be easy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 We don't need to sell Taylor, he's a useful member of the squad. We just need to pick the two best centre backs for each game and he's not necessarily one of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 We don't need to sell Taylor, he's a useful member of the squad. We just need to pick the two best centre backs for each game and he's not necessarily one of them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 All the Taylor speculation is it even assured he'll be fit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 If Taylor walks straight back in then Kinnear is a c**t, fact. I concur. Back four were excellent yesterday, Coloccini was world class and Bassong was excellent. As someone said Enrique was cracking defensively but distribution continued to be poor and Beye was Beye. We looked very solid, Chelsea struggled to break us down. One game! That same back-four were awful at home to Wigan and do not fill me with any confidence that such performances can be repeated on a consistent basis, mainly due to the tactics, selection and more significantly the midfield admittedly than the defence itself. By the same token surely the starting 11 who performed so well, should be kept for the next match? Ye I bet if I started a thread in the same vein as this one many would have Duff and Butt in particular nowhere near the bench never mind the starting 11. Didn't see the Wigan game, I can only go on what I see, and that back 5 played and defended as a unit yesterday. The second paragraph is completely irrelevant to the debate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 the problem with Taylor is that the idiots who end up picking the team will always drop an easy target like Bassong in favour of the 'local hero' Shearer wont like, which is on the reasons i'd be happy with him getting the job next month Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate Toon Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 I don't think the fb's don't get forward because they don't want to, i actually think its more to do with tactics, JK plays more long ball stuff, so full backs aren't really needed as we have wingers, hence endless hoofs up to Ameobi. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now