Ronaldo Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Would rather have Saylor then Lescott alongside Colo. Absolute drivel, that. Seriously, log off. You know he's talking about Ronaldo's comments, right? I know nothing of the context, merely that the notion of Saylor > Lescott is absolute bollocks. Nobody said Saylor was better. Somebody suggested that we buy Lescott and that was my response. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Ronaldo's recent musings: Williamson coould and would be dropped the second Saylor was fit. "And rightly so". Would rather have Saylor then Lescott alongside Colo. It had been years since Taylor had been shown up like Williamson was against Arsenal. Is any of this relevant at all? There's not much between Williamson and Taylor at CB. This is Mike's first season at this level, in fairness. Taylor's had nearly 7 years to become a decent PL defender. Relevant to the fact that you insisted - repeatedly - that Taylor was clearly a better bet than MW less than a month ago. Relevant because you're now ridiculing Taylor's performances in games which were played before you claimed he hadn't been destroyed like MW was by Arsenal in ages. Deal with it. If you give it out, you have to be prepared to take it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Would rather have Saylor then Lescott alongside Colo. Jesus. Wept. Absolute drivel, that. Seriously, log off. You know he's talking about Ronaldo's comments, right? I know nothing of the context, merely that the notion of Saylor > Lescott is absolute bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 9, 2011 Share Posted March 9, 2011 Ronaldo's recent musings: Williamson coould and would be dropped the second Saylor was fit. "And rightly so". Would rather have Saylor then Lescott alongside Colo. It had been years since Taylor had been shown up like Williamson was against Arsenal. Is any of this relevant at all? There's not much between Williamson and Taylor at CB. This is Mike's first season at this level, in fairness. Taylor's had nearly 7 years to become a decent PL defender. Relevant to the fact that you insisted - repeatedly - that Taylor was clearly a better bet than MW less than a month ago. Relevant because you're now ridiculing Taylor's performances in games which were played before you claimed he hadn't been destroyed like MW was by Arsenal in ages. Deal with it. If you give it out, you have to be prepared to take it. Take what? You don't even seem to know what point you're trying to make. Taylor's always been a lower-level PL defender and i've never waived from the opinion that we should sell him the second we get a half-decent offer. You might remember this post, considering it was in response to your nonsense: People prefer Williamson because they 'swallowed the club's story about Taylor's wage saga' - I've heard it all now I can't see many holding that opinion, and as someone who prefers Williamson it's got nothing to do with Taylor's contract. So you're denying that there was significant dissent on this forum towards Taylor while the contract thing dragged on? You're denying that coloured people's opinions of him, despite him barely putting a foot wrong when fit last season? Yep, heard it all now... Got to be said, Taylor's had 6 seasons in the PL. The fact you're pointing to half a season in The Championship as proof of his quality says it all. Ultimately, both Taylor and Williamson are lower-end PL defenders. The players around them on the pitch have lots of quality and consistency, so replacing one or both is not a major priority at this moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 If you disagree with Ronaldo you're wrong. Always. End of conversation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 Ronaldo's recent musings: Williamson coould and would be dropped the second Saylor was fit. "And rightly so". Would rather have Saylor then Lescott alongside Colo. It had been years since Taylor had been shown up like Williamson was against Arsenal. Is any of this relevant at all? There's not much between Williamson and Taylor at CB. This is Mike's first season at this level, in fairness. Taylor's had nearly 7 years to become a decent PL defender. Relevant to the fact that you insisted - repeatedly - that Taylor was clearly a better bet than MW less than a month ago. Relevant because you're now ridiculing Taylor's performances in games which were played before you claimed he hadn't been destroyed like MW was by Arsenal in ages. Deal with it. If you give it out, you have to be prepared to take it. Take what? You don't even seem to know what point you're trying to make. Taylor's always been a lower-level PL defender and i've never waived from the opinion that we should sell him the second we get a half-decent offer. You might remember this post, considering it was in response to your nonsense: People prefer Williamson because they 'swallowed the club's story about Taylor's wage saga' - I've heard it all now I can't see many holding that opinion, and as someone who prefers Williamson it's got nothing to do with Taylor's contract. So you're denying that there was significant dissent on this forum towards Taylor while the contract thing dragged on? You're denying that coloured people's opinions of him, despite him barely putting a foot wrong when fit last season? Yep, heard it all now... Got to be said, Taylor's had 6 seasons in the PL. The fact you're pointing to half a season in The Championship as proof of his quality says it all. Ultimately, both Taylor and Williamson are lower-end PL defenders. The players around them on the pitch have lots of quality and consistency, so replacing one or both is not a major priority at this moment. Dear me. Go back over your posts on Mike Williamson of just a few weeks ago. Not only did you say Taylor should rightly come back in for him, you said you'd rather have Taylor than Lescott alongside Colo. This is about the fourth time you've tried to rewrite recent history on here. Give it up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpal78 Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 Ronaldo's recent musings: Williamson coould and would be dropped the second Saylor was fit. "And rightly so". Would rather have Saylor then Lescott alongside Colo. It had been years since Taylor had been shown up like Williamson was against Arsenal. Is any of this relevant at all? There's not much between Williamson and Taylor at CB. This is Mike's first season at this level, in fairness. Taylor's had nearly 7 years to become a decent PL defender. Relevant to the fact that you insisted - repeatedly - that Taylor was clearly a better bet than MW less than a month ago. Relevant because you're now ridiculing Taylor's performances in games which were played before you claimed he hadn't been destroyed like MW was by Arsenal in ages. Deal with it. If you give it out, you have to be prepared to take it. Take what? You don't even seem to know what point you're trying to make. Taylor's always been a lower-level PL defender and i've never waived from the opinion that we should sell him the second we get a half-decent offer. You might remember this post, considering it was in response to your nonsense: People prefer Williamson because they 'swallowed the club's story about Taylor's wage saga' - I've heard it all now I can't see many holding that opinion, and as someone who prefers Williamson it's got nothing to do with Taylor's contract. So you're denying that there was significant dissent on this forum towards Taylor while the contract thing dragged on? You're denying that coloured people's opinions of him, despite him barely putting a foot wrong when fit last season? Yep, heard it all now... Got to be said, Taylor's had 6 seasons in the PL. The fact you're pointing to half a season in The Championship as proof of his quality says it all. Ultimately, both Taylor and Williamson are lower-end PL defenders. The players around them on the pitch have lots of quality and consistency, so replacing one or both is not a major priority at this moment. Dear me. Go back over your posts on Mike Williamson of just a few weeks ago. Not only did you say Taylor should rightly come back in for him, you said you'd rather have Taylor than Lescott alongside Colo. This is about the fourth time you've tried to rewrite recent history on here. Give it up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 Ronaldo's recent musings: Williamson coould and would be dropped the second Saylor was fit. "And rightly so". Would rather have Saylor then Lescott alongside Colo. It had been years since Taylor had been shown up like Williamson was against Arsenal. Is any of this relevant at all? There's not much between Williamson and Taylor at CB. This is Mike's first season at this level, in fairness. Taylor's had nearly 7 years to become a decent PL defender. Relevant to the fact that you insisted - repeatedly - that Taylor was clearly a better bet than MW less than a month ago. Relevant because you're now ridiculing Taylor's performances in games which were played before you claimed he hadn't been destroyed like MW was by Arsenal in ages. Deal with it. If you give it out, you have to be prepared to take it. Take what? You don't even seem to know what point you're trying to make. Taylor's always been a lower-level PL defender and i've never waived from the opinion that we should sell him the second we get a half-decent offer. You might remember this post, considering it was in response to your nonsense: People prefer Williamson because they 'swallowed the club's story about Taylor's wage saga' - I've heard it all now I can't see many holding that opinion, and as someone who prefers Williamson it's got nothing to do with Taylor's contract. So you're denying that there was significant dissent on this forum towards Taylor while the contract thing dragged on? You're denying that coloured people's opinions of him, despite him barely putting a foot wrong when fit last season? Yep, heard it all now... Got to be said, Taylor's had 6 seasons in the PL. The fact you're pointing to half a season in The Championship as proof of his quality says it all. Ultimately, both Taylor and Williamson are lower-end PL defenders. The players around them on the pitch have lots of quality and consistency, so replacing one or both is not a major priority at this moment. Dear me. Go back over your posts on Mike Williamson of just a few weeks ago. Not only did you say Taylor should rightly come back in for him, you said you'd rather have Taylor than Lescott alongside Colo. This is about the fourth time you've tried to rewrite recent history on here. Give it up. And where have I contradicted any of that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alpal78 Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 Ronaldo's recent musings: Williamson coould and would be dropped the second Saylor was fit. "And rightly so". Would rather have Saylor then Lescott alongside Colo. It had been years since Taylor had been shown up like Williamson was against Arsenal. Is any of this relevant at all? There's not much between Williamson and Taylor at CB. This is Mike's first season at this level, in fairness. Taylor's had nearly 7 years to become a decent PL defender. Relevant to the fact that you insisted - repeatedly - that Taylor was clearly a better bet than MW less than a month ago. Relevant because you're now ridiculing Taylor's performances in games which were played before you claimed he hadn't been destroyed like MW was by Arsenal in ages. Deal with it. If you give it out, you have to be prepared to take it. Take what? You don't even seem to know what point you're trying to make. Taylor's always been a lower-level PL defender and i've never waived from the opinion that we should sell him the second we get a half-decent offer. You might remember this post, considering it was in response to your nonsense: People prefer Williamson because they 'swallowed the club's story about Taylor's wage saga' - I've heard it all now I can't see many holding that opinion, and as someone who prefers Williamson it's got nothing to do with Taylor's contract. So you're denying that there was significant dissent on this forum towards Taylor while the contract thing dragged on? You're denying that coloured people's opinions of him, despite him barely putting a foot wrong when fit last season? Yep, heard it all now... Got to be said, Taylor's had 6 seasons in the PL. The fact you're pointing to half a season in The Championship as proof of his quality says it all. Ultimately, both Taylor and Williamson are lower-end PL defenders. The players around them on the pitch have lots of quality and consistency, so replacing one or both is not a major priority at this moment. Dear me. Go back over your posts on Mike Williamson of just a few weeks ago. Not only did you say Taylor should rightly come back in for him, you said you'd rather have Taylor than Lescott alongside Colo. This is about the fourth time you've tried to rewrite recent history on here. Give it up. And where have I contradicted any of that? well even if you didn't contradict yourself (you're running backwards faster than Taylor here), the fact that you think Taylor should replace Williamson makes your opinion that of a class A buffoon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 Magorific thinks the same, yet you've just given him a lovely round of applause. Time to develop some opinions of your own, mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 can someone clear this up for me, does taylor dive in too much or back off too much, he was supposed to have been backing off too much on saturday when at right back (not for the equaliser though as eveidenced by the youtube clip) which everyone we've played in that position this season has been accused of aswell ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 can someone clear this up for me, does taylor dive in too much or back off too much, he was supposed to have been backing off too much on saturday when at right back (not for the equaliser though as eveidenced by the youtube clip) which everyone we've played in that position this season has been accused of aswell ? what's important is making good decisions general, is it not? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 can someone clear this up for me, does taylor dive in too much or back off too much, he was supposed to have been backing off too much on saturday when at right back (not for the equaliser though as eveidenced by the youtube clip) which everyone we've played in that position this season has been accused of aswell ? what's important is making good decisions general, is it not? it is, posting that someone backs off all the time when they don't is a bad decision. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 can someone clear this up for me, does taylor dive in too much or back off too much, he was supposed to have been backing off too much on saturday when at right back (not for the equaliser though as eveidenced by the youtube clip) which everyone we've played in that position this season has been accused of aswell ? what's important is making good decisions general, is it not? it is, posting that someone backs off all the time when they don't is a bad decision. haha, i dunno like. i've seen him do it an awful lot, with my own eyes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted March 10, 2011 Share Posted March 10, 2011 Magorific thinks the same, yet you've just given him a lovely round of applause. Time to develop some opinions of your own, mate. Magorific thinks the same, yet you've just given him a lovely round of applause. Time to develop some opinions of your own, mate. I think he was applauding my opinion of you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RupertCommunicator Posted March 14, 2011 Share Posted March 14, 2011 Fucking hell man, this is a thread on Judas Carroll! Get a room elsewhere if you want to slag off a shite defender and Mike Williamson! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 Liverpool fans already complaining about the amount of long balls pumped up to him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 can someone clear this up for me, does taylor dive in too much or back off too much, he was supposed to have been backing off too much on saturday when at right back (not for the equaliser though as eveidenced by the youtube clip) which everyone we've played in that position this season has been accused of aswell ? what's important is making good decisions general, is it not? it is, posting that someone backs off all the time when they don't is a bad decision. haha, i dunno like. i've seen him do it an awful lot, with my own eyes. I've seen him do it so he ends up on his own goal line saving the ball with his hands like a 2nd rate goalie. I'm not really sure how he could back off any further than that without getting on the metro and heading back home. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conjo Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 Liverpool fans already complaining about the amount of long balls pumped up to him. Duh, what were they expecting? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raconteur Posted March 15, 2011 Share Posted March 15, 2011 Fucking hell man, this is a thread on Judas Carroll! Get a room elsewhere if you want to slag off a shite defender and Mike Williamson! I'm with you - every time I see this thread bumped I hope to read he's gotten into trouble at a Scouse nightclub, or Gerrard has snapped his legs in training. Instead I'm reading about his former punching bag Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cristov Posted March 16, 2011 Share Posted March 16, 2011 http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Football-Association-Refuses-To-Answer-Questions-From-Sky-News-Over-Andy-Carroll-Transfer-Deal/Article/201103315953110?lpos=UK_News_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_1&lid=ARTICLE_15953110_Football_Association_Refuses_To_Answer_Questions_From_Sky_News_Over_Andy_Carroll_Transfer_Deal donno what all this means for us? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooneyToonArmy Posted March 16, 2011 Share Posted March 16, 2011 Bruce: I tried to sign Carroll - but Wigan couldn't afford Newcastle's £4.5m asking http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1366598/Steve-Bruce-I-tried-sign-Andy-Carroll--Wigan-afford-Newcastles-4-5m-asking-price.html#ixzz1Gkey2rnxml? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted March 16, 2011 Share Posted March 16, 2011 Bruce: I tried to sign Carroll - but Wigan couldn't afford Newcastle's £4.5m asking http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1366598/Steve-Bruce-I-tried-sign-Andy-Carroll--Wigan-afford-Newcastles-4-5m-asking-price.html#ixzz1Gkey2rnxml? the comments at the bottom are class Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted March 16, 2011 Share Posted March 16, 2011 http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/Football-Association-Refuses-To-Answer-Questions-From-Sky-News-Over-Andy-Carroll-Transfer-Deal/Article/201103315953110?lpos=UK_News_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_1&lid=ARTICLE_15953110_Football_Association_Refuses_To_Answer_Questions_From_Sky_News_Over_Andy_Carroll_Transfer_Deal donno what all this means for us? It suggests that Carroll might have represented himself, which is rather interesting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted March 16, 2011 Share Posted March 16, 2011 Something seems dodgy about all this. http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2011/mar/16/liverpool-andy-carroll-newcastle-united-agent Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts