Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Arsenal 99.86%

Man Utd 99.50%

Chelsea 98.99%

Tottenham Hotspur 98.38%

Blackpool 97.92%

Stoke City 97.43%

Fulham 97.39%

Manchester City 96.26%

West Ham United 95.67%

Liverpool 95.32%

Wolverhampton Wanderers 95.22%

West Bromwich Albion 94.22%

Newcastle United 91.79%

Everton 90.84%

Birmingham City 90.07%

Aston Villa 86.94%

Bolton Wanderers 85.08%

Blackburn Rovers 83.72%

Sunderland 83.59%

Wigan Athletic 76.27%

 

average home attendance as a % of the full home capacity last season

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 Barcelona 1,522,913 80,153

2 Real Madrid 1,344,000 70,736

3 Atlético Madrid 849,000 44,684

4 Valencia 790,395 41,599

5 Sevilla FC 684,000 36,000

6 Athletic Bilbao 680,500 35,815

7 Espanyol 527,000 27,736

8 Real Zaragoza 467,000 25,944

9 Real Sociedad 480,500 25,289

10 Málaga 457,500 24,078

11 Deportivo La Coruña 427,000 22,473

12 Hercules 410,500 21,605

13 Sporting Gijon 391,500 20,605

14 Villarreal 353,500 18,605

15 Osasuna 323,000 17,000

16 Levante 311,000 16,368

17 Racing Santander 309,000 16,263

18 Mallorca 269,500 14,184

19 Almeria 230,500 12,131

20 Getafe 211,500 11,131

 

Maybe when I have time I'll calculate the % compared to stadium capacity.

 

Surprisingly, Madrid's attendance has fallen by a few thousand since Florentino came back, despise ushering the neo-Galáctico era.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Arsenal 99.86%

Man Utd 99.50%

Chelsea 98.99%

Tottenham Hotspur 98.38%

Blackpool 97.92%

Stoke City 97.43%

Fulham 97.39%

Manchester City 96.26%

West Ham United 95.67%

Liverpool 95.32%

Wolverhampton Wanderers 95.22%

West Bromwich Albion 94.22%

Newcastle United 91.79%

Everton 90.84%

Birmingham City 90.07%

Aston Villa 86.94%

Bolton Wanderers 85.08%

Blackburn Rovers 83.72%

Sunderland 83.59%

Wigan Athletic 76.27%

 

average home attendance as a % of the full home capacity last season

 

 

Sunderland :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Less pressure on the smaller clubs to fill their bench and possibly take on wages they can't quite afford?

 

But as Hughton said himself, there is nothing stopping a manager just bringing in some of the kids for experience.

Why bring in a rule that limits a managers choice? ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest ObiChrisKenobi

Appearance fees are triggered even you appear on the bench, think of those League 2 clubs who have just been promoted, and are having to pay out appearance fees for players that won't even get on the pitch. Just because Championship teams are comfortable, doesn't mean all teams in the Football League are with having 7 subs on the bench, however, saying that, I'm not sure why they don't just allow it to be an optional 'up to' 7 seven subs. Though I guess, so clubs would argue it gives 'bigger' clubs an unfair advantage?

 

No idea. Seems crazy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Craig-NUFC

Isn't this done in Spain in the Segunda B divisions? Anyway, yeah quite a silly decision. A sensible option could be to have 7 subs, but have 2 of them come from the clubs youth system.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Less pressure on the smaller clubs to fill their bench and possibly take on wages they can't quite afford?

 

But as Hughton said himself, there is nothing stopping a manager just bringing in some of the kids for experience.

Why bring in a rule that limits a managers choice? ???

because their stupid is my conclusion

Link to post
Share on other sites

So Bob Bradley is out as US National Coach and has been replaced by Jurgen Klinsmann.

 

They're still not gonna win the World Cup.

 

Be a first if they do...

 

BrianStraus Brian Straus 

by ArgentinaFW

None of the 19 World Cup champions has been coached by a man from a foreign country.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...