Jump to content

Newcastle United Supporters Trust (NUST)


Newcastle United Supporters Trust (NUST)   

186 members have voted

  1. 1. Have you / do you intend to pledge to the 1892 Pledge scheme orchestrated by the NUST?

    • Yes
      70
    • No
      107


Recommended Posts

Guest Biggsbond14
4 hours ago, Joey Linton said:

87% of those who voted were in favour of winding it up i believe, rather than 87% of all members voted. 

 

Would be interested to see the actual numbers though, given how short the voting window was. 

Yes I thought that too, fucking shambles springs to mind 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Biggsbond14
2 hours ago, Geordie2302 said:

Somebody mentioned this on Twitter and that the ticket turnaround time was 48 hours to resolve. Not helpful when you only have two days to vote :doh:

How convenient for them 

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Heron said:

In all honesty, I don't think the outcome would be any different if the voting time were longer.

 

 

 

Nor do I, but I'm not sure that's the point when people have parted with their own cash. 

 

 

Edited by Joey Linton

Link to post
Share on other sites

https://twitter.com/nufctrust/status/1485012408171221004?s=21

 

Appreciate many on here have reservations about the activities of the Trust and the personalities involved, however this is absolutely the kind of thing we need them to be getting involved with.

 

What happened at the away turnstiles yesterday needs highlighting at every level. I was fortunate enough to get in before things got really hairy, however even at that point to describe the whole process as ‘shambolic’ would be a massive understatement.

 

Hopefully they can get to speak to the relevant people so there’s a proper investigation in to what went on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SteV said:

https://twitter.com/nufctrust/status/1485012408171221004?s=21

 

Appreciate many on here have reservations about the activities of the Trust and the personalities involved, however this is absolutely the kind of thing we need them to be getting involved with.

 

What happened at the away turnstiles yesterday needs highlighting at every level. I was fortunate enough to get in before things got really hairy, however even at that point to describe the whole process as ‘shambolic’ would be a massive understatement.

 

Hopefully they can get to speak to the relevant people so there’s a proper investigation in to what went on.

Of course it is. Not flogging jigsaws. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Biggsbond14
18 hours ago, SteV said:

https://twitter.com/nufctrust/status/1485012408171221004?s=21

 

Appreciate many on here have reservations about the activities of the Trust and the personalities involved, however this is absolutely the kind of thing we need them to be getting involved with.

 

What happened at the away turnstiles yesterday needs highlighting at every level. I was fortunate enough to get in before things got really hairy, however even at that point to describe the whole process as ‘shambolic’ would be a massive understatement.

 

Hopefully they can get to speak to the relevant people so there’s a proper investigation in to what went on.

The sort of thing that should be one of there main aims to protect fans and everything football related for us and every club , wonder if they have reached out to other clubs with large followings to see how their fans are treated? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

https://mailchi.mp/8a68a379b338/notice-of-annual-general-meetings?e=44af82a042

 

NUST have announced 2 AGMs (the delayed and this year's) without giving members the required notice period to be able to submit resolutions (28 days) and can't even get the day/date right - 22 February is a Tuesday, not a Thursday so fuck knows when it actually is...

 

It's just really really poor. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Geordie2302 said:

https://mailchi.mp/8a68a379b338/notice-of-annual-general-meetings?e=44af82a042

 

NUST have announced 2 AGMs (the delayed and this year's) without giving members the required notice period to be able to submit resolutions (28 days) and can't even get the day/date right - 22 February is a Tuesday, not a Thursday so fuck knows when it actually is...

 

It's just really really poor. 

Oh dear :lol:

 

Absolute jokers. 

 

 

Edited by Joey Linton

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Joey Linton said:

It's the Tuesday apparently, although might it get moved again / cancelled anyway to give the required 28 days notice? 

 

I emailed Greg, and got a response, It's only 14 days required to give notice of an AGM (not sure about two at once) but the rules also say members can only raise resolutions 28 days before an AGM (so a conflict in the rules). I raised a resolution by way of a motion of no confidence in december and have asked repeatedly for them to clarify receipt and that it will be discussed (seconded by several) - keep getting a stock "i will email you soon..." 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

 

Woah, has he finished work then?

@Joey Linton you might get a reply.

 

 

Or just a partial one... I only seem to get a response where (and maybe I'm reading too much into it) they think they are getting one over on me i.e., saying it's 14 days notice required for an AGM, when my point, although initially poorly worded in haste, was around not allowing members sufficient time to raise resolutions in line with the rules... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Dr.Spaceman said:

 

I'm not a fan of the NUST by any means, but you're a right sad bastard the way you go on about them.

 

I respectfully disagree, if nobody calls this to account we'll never have a supporters trust worth talking about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep we’ve seen in the news for weeks now the importance of following your own rules.

 

yes these are boring mundane details to many but it is important that people like geordie2302 are checking these details and trying to hold people to account.

 

if people didn’t do this, society would collapse

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, James said:

Yep we’ve seen in the news for weeks now the importance of following your own rules.

 

yes these are boring mundane details to many but it is important that people like geordie2302 are checking these details and trying to hold people to account.

 

if people didn’t do this, society would collapse

I get your point but the major difference being the group of people you are referring to in one instance are highly paid and it’s there job. Whereas the group of people you are comparing them too are volunteering their own limited time around their jobs and families.

 

Thats why any criticism of them should be measured with that in mind along with the knowledge there is nothing stopping yourself and other critics from stepping forward if they think they can do a better job of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LFEE said:

I get your point but the major difference being the group of people you are referring to in one instance are highly paid and it’s there job. Whereas the group of people you are comparing them too are volunteering their own limited time around their jobs and families.

 

Thats why any criticism of them should be measured with that in mind along with the knowledge there is nothing stopping yourself and other critics from stepping forward if they think they can do a better job of it.


People on here did step forward for the NUST. Then they had to leave because of the fuckaboutery. There’s no point in volunteering your time if you can’t follow your own articles of association. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...