Skirge Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 All depends on other loan options we have Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 Always good to have options, as long as its Harewood and.... rather than Harwood or.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 Yes, unless we can get someone in who is less grumpy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maybe_next_year Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 no, would like to see ranger get more time. and with 4 other strikers on the team i dont think we really need a 5th Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest PJ87 Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 Anyone who cups his ear to the Gallowgate end because he got a fucking assist can piss off. 3 of his 4 goals my granny would have finished. I'll admit it was a cracking finish at Barnsley. But then he danced off the pitch, laughing and joking. Obviously a 2-2 draw at Barnsley was worth celebrating. Try our best to get someone a bit better. If not, then he can stay and be 5th choice striker behind Shola, Carroll, Ranger and Lovenkrands. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 no, would like to see ranger get more time. and with 4 other strikers on the team i dont think we really need a 5th I'm a big Ranger fan and while I would like to see him starting a few more games ahead of Marlon, I would still prefer Harewood in our squad rather than one of our promotion rivals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maybe_next_year Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 no, would like to see ranger get more time. and with 4 other strikers on the team i dont think we really need a 5th I'm a big Ranger fan and while I would like to see him starting a few more games ahead of Marlon, I would still prefer Harewood in our squad rather than one of our promotion rivals. any idea how much Harewood's wages are? dont think we're really a club that can afford to pay a players wages just so a promotion rival cant have him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 no, would like to see ranger get more time. and with 4 other strikers on the team i dont think we really need a 5th I'm a big Ranger fan and while I would like to see him starting a few more games ahead of Marlon, I would still prefer Harewood in our squad rather than one of our promotion rivals. any idea how much Harewood's wages are? dont think we're really a club that can afford to pay a players wages just so a promotion rival cant have him. If a tightwad like Ashley has agreed to pay his wages then we can obviously afford them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewellander Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 He's scored some important goals for us. Even if they weren't all quality, we need people in advanced roles who will put the ball in the back of the net, and he's proven he can do it at this level. I don't see why we shouldn't keep him on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 no, would like to see ranger get more time. and with 4 other strikers on the team i dont think we really need a 5th We do when 3 out of the other 4 aren't capable of the same amount of goals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 Anyone who cups his ear to the Gallowgate end because he got a fucking assist can piss off. 3 of his 4 goals my granny would have finished. I'll admit it was a cracking finish at Barnsley. But then he danced off the pitch, laughing and joking. Obviously a 2-2 draw at Barnsley was worth celebrating. Try our best to get someone a bit better. If not, then he can stay and be 5th choice striker behind Shola, Carroll, Ranger and Lovenkrands. He was starting to win me over until he did that. Moron. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Heneage Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 I would but as said previous, with no potential future transfer. He'll do for now, but he's too lazy for the top league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 Anyone who cups his ear to the Gallowgate end because he got a fucking assist can piss off. 3 of his 4 goals my granny would have finished. I'll admit it was a cracking finish at Barnsley. But then he danced off the pitch, laughing and joking. Obviously a 2-2 draw at Barnsley was worth celebrating. Try our best to get someone a bit better. If not, then he can stay and be 5th choice striker behind Shola, Carroll, Ranger and Lovenkrands. He was starting to win me over until he did that. Moron. Yeah, it's a bit much when the cunt showcases your ignorance publicly. Get rid ASAP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 got to be weighed up between what else can we get, and if we cant get better, how much are we paying him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 got to be weighed up between what else can we get, and if we cant get better, how much are we paying him. The only reason for keeping him as things stand is that he's already here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 got to be weighed up between what else can we get, and if we cant get better, how much are we paying him. The only reason for keeping him as things stand is that he's already here. indubitably Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 got to be weighed up between what else can we get, and if we cant get better, how much are we paying him. The only reason for keeping him as things stand is that he's already here. So we've got someone better lined up for January then? Brilliant news. Promotion is a dead cert then surely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 no, would like to see ranger get more time. and with 4 other strikers on the team i dont think we really need a 5th I'm a big Ranger fan and while I would like to see him starting a few more games ahead of Marlon, I would still prefer Harewood in our squad rather than one of our promotion rivals. I'd quite like to see him in one of our promotion rivals' squads, means they'd only have 10 players on the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 no, would like to see ranger get more time. and with 4 other strikers on the team i dont think we really need a 5th I'm a big Ranger fan and while I would like to see him starting a few more games ahead of Marlon, I would still prefer Harewood in our squad rather than one of our promotion rivals. I'd quite like to see him in one of our promotion rivals' squads, means they'd only have 10 players on the pitch. Quite a stupid response really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liam Liam Liam O Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 got to be weighed up between what else can we get, and if we cant get better, how much are we paying him. The only reason for keeping him as things stand is that he's already here. So we've got someone better lined up for January then? Brilliant news. Promotion is a dead cert then surely. Who said that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 no, would like to see ranger get more time. and with 4 other strikers on the team i dont think we really need a 5th I'm a big Ranger fan and while I would like to see him starting a few more games ahead of Marlon, I would still prefer Harewood in our squad rather than one of our promotion rivals. I'd quite like to see him in one of our promotion rivals' squads, means they'd only have 10 players on the pitch. Quite a stupid response really. No, he's utter shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offshore Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 He's cack, but he's a match for 90% or more of the other strikers in this league so unless we have someone of equal or better quality coming in then its no hardship keeping him for the rest of the season - as long as thats all we keep him for. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SGSC Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 I reckon he is pretty awful. Having said that, i dont care if he goes missing for 99% of a match as long as he keeps popping up and scoring important goals for us, which in the end, is what strikers are meant to do. So, keep him here i say. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 I definitely don't think we should look to keep him beyond the end of the season but that's not the question. As for being able to loan someone better, by the very nature of loans it's either youngsters loaned out for experience or established players who aren't getting a game at their current club. Not exactly the cream of the crop to choose from. At least Harewood is now contributing and has settled in the team. any idea how much Harewood's wages are? dont think we're really a club that can afford to pay a players wages just so a promotion rival cant have him. I've read he's on £25K a week at Aston Villa but I've no idea if Newcastle are paying all that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 Ive put yes. Better the fuck faced, rape feet we know, I suppose. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now