Dr.Spaceman Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 Not a lot between them but Williamson doesn't whine like a little bitch or play any sort of 'i love the fans' card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 Williamson's certainly a lot more likeable than Taylor, that's for sure. When Taylor came out with his "i want more money or i'm off" transfer request tripe at the end of the summer, it smacked of everything that had happened the previous couple of years. Basically, mercenaries not playing for the club. Obviously i wouldn't put Taylor in the same boat as the likes of Martins and Owen (after all, he's still here) - but, similarly, i don't put him in the same boat as the likes of Nolan, Carroll, Barton, etc... ie, those who look like they'd literally die for the club. I think there's more of a future in Williamson/Colo than there is with Taylor. If only cos i see him as a bit of a dick who'd get his head turned at some point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 I'm a little suprised more has'nt been made of Williamson's performance, tbh. I don't know exactly what it is, but when he plays, I feel much more confident about our defence than when Taylor plays, even to the extent that when he makes mistakes, I don't worry as much. In the second half I thought he was excellent, and lead Coloccini's example. If he can remain at that level, it's a no-brainer to play him ahead of Taylor. I know what you mean. Williamson comes across as a calm personality whereas our other defenders - Simpson, Perch, Taylor, Colo, Enrique - all look a bit nervy under pressure. Our defence usually looks that bit more confident and organised when Willo's around. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 taylor/colo was looking solid for west ham and wigan games, i'm sure once taylors match fitness is up to speed hes as good as willo and maybe better than willo, question is the partnership between him and colo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 17, 2011 Share Posted January 17, 2011 I'm a little suprised more has'nt been made of Williamson's performance, tbh. I don't know exactly what it is, but when he plays, I feel much more confident about our defence than when Taylor plays, even to the extent that when he makes mistakes, I don't worry as much. In the second half I thought he was excellent, and lead Coloccini's example. If he can remain at that level, it's a no-brainer to play him ahead of Taylor. I know what you mean. Williamson comes across as a calm personality whereas our other defenders - Simpson, Taylor, Colo, Enrique - all look a bit nervy under pressure. Our defence usually looks that bit more confident and organised when Willo's around. Enrique!? Got to be the coolest cucumber in the, erm, pack (sic). If there's a ball played down our left-side... it either exits via the touchline, or is pumped back up-field by Enrique, after he's taken the onrushing opponent to fucking Alaska*. *© johnnypd, circa 2008. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 If you think that he's cooler under pressure than Colo or Enrique, you simply aren't watching the games - in addition to being shockingly biased in favour of Williamson. Getting tiresome now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I'll agree with that, there's been a few times this season when the ball has got trapped/lost/stuck under Williamson's feet and he looks like he panics. Few sloppy back passes to the Krul too (seemingly forgetting which foot Krul kicks with). However, his long balls are better than Taylor's, but I'm not sure that's a great achievement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I still think he's better than Taylor when under pressure. At least Williamson knows that hand shouldn't touch ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shayno Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I still think he's better than Taylor when under pressure. At least Williamson knows that hand shouldn't touch ball. Are you kidding? visibly shitting himself for the first half hour yesterday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 At the first sign of pressure he sends the ball straight to out of play, a bit too conservative. I guess that's better than playing it out and trying to do too much when he can't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisMcQuillan Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 He's a good, solid defender. Not much else to say really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shak Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Limited footballer that shouldn't be viewed as anything more than a squad player moving forward, would start Taylor ahead of him every time given the choice. Decent backup if he's happy to be a squad player though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Taylor is better physically and technically. He has far more natural attributes to be a superior defender to Williamson. Yet Williamson simply looks like a better defender, go figure. Saylor has been stuck at the same point of development for about 4 years. It's because Williamson reads the game better. Espicially when the ball's in the air, either a cross or a diagonal. Williamson did very well in the 2nd half against the mackems when they tried popping the ball over the top. He just read it. Taylor's a better athlete and better with the ball. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Bierhoff played in Serie B when he was 24-25 before he moved to Udinese, and imo he was quite "good" there. clintdempsey, just saw your post Scored against us in the Anglo Italian Cup in the Keegan promotion season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Taylor is better physically and technically. He has far more natural attributes to be a superior defender to Williamson. Yet Williamson simply looks like a better defender, go figure. Saylor has been stuck at the same point of development for about 4 years. It's because Williamson reads the game better. Espicially when the ball's in the air, either a cross or a diagonal. Williamson did very well in the 2nd half against the mackems when they tried popping the ball over the top. He just read it. Taylor's a better athlete and better with the ball. Agree with these sentiments. Williamson may be physically and arguably technically inferior - but is a far more intelligent footballer than Taylor. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRC Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I'd say Taylor is pretty technically limited. Willow is twice the player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 A mackem ST holder who would never normally have a kind word for anything NUFC described Williamson's performance as "class". High praise indeed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 A mackem ST holder who would never normally have a kind word for anything NUFC described Williamson's performance as "class". High praise indeed. Obviously missed the first half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 I'd say Taylor is pretty technically limited. Willow is twice the player. Wouldn't say twice the player like, although Taylor hasn't developed into the "future England captain" people were banging onabout when he was 21 he isn't as bad as some people make out, was good last year before he got himself injured but hasn't realy had much of a chance this year. As for Willo i'd just like to see him beef up a bit, his physical presence hasn't exactly become a problem but a bit more muscle wouldn't hurt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Perhaps ‘cool-headed’ isn’t the best description, but Williamson is a strong character and that comes out in his play. I think it also helps out the rest of the defence. Centre back is a very exposed position where players have to make fine judgements about whether or not to challenge, where to position themselves etc etc Mistakes can be costly and the role comes with pressure, and a CB needs to be fully committed to their decisions. Despite the fact that Taylor is by far the better athlete, I don’t think he’s developed those kinds of mental qualities like Williamson has. Taylor’s career – so far, at least – has been a disappointment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 taylor/colo was looking solid for west ham and wigan games, i'm sure once taylors match fitness is up to speed hes as good as willo and maybe better than willo, question is the partnership between him and colo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRC Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Williamson is a solid performer who may get done by the better player. Whereas Taylor is likely to mess the defensive line up, or come charging out to dive into a tackle at a relatively comfortable moment in the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 18, 2011 Share Posted January 18, 2011 Williamson is a solid performer who may get done by the better player. Whereas Taylor is likely to mess the defensive line up, or come charging out to dive into a tackle at a relatively comfortable moment in the game. Fair judgement there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 Should have put his left foot in the way of it. Infuriating. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 22, 2011 Share Posted January 22, 2011 Great game today i though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now