Ketsbaia Posted June 26, 2011 Share Posted June 26, 2011 Well if Liverpool are getting Boudebouz, they wont need Zog will they? Especially with Downing/Adam coming in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 26, 2011 Share Posted June 26, 2011 Smells like a Wigan/Mersey attempt to turn Zoggy's head from coming back here. The "north west sources" are probably Liverpool fans who want their club to have first pick on all their targets. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest magpie99 Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Heard from a reliable source yesterday that he is signing for the mackems next week, after the 1st July. Also, Makems bid for Wickham apparently not true. CW is definitely signing for Liverpool. I am not ITK but my source has close connections to the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest WashyGeordie Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Heard from a reliable source yesterday that he is signing for the mackems next week, after the 1st July. Also, Makems bid for Wickham apparently not true. CW is definitely signing for Liverpool. I am not ITK but my source has close connections to the club. I'm sure i've heard that line for the past 18 months or so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Heard from a reliable source yesterday that he is signing for the mackems next week, after the 1st July. Also, Makems bid for Wickham apparently not true. CW is definitely signing for Liverpool. I am not ITK but my source has close connections to the club. I'm sure i've heard that line for the past 18 months or so. The reliable source is the voices in his head that are constantly whispering to him that our club is doomed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Heard from a reliable source yesterday that he is signing for the mackems next week, after the 1st July. Also, Makems bid for Wickham apparently not true. CW is definitely signing for Liverpool. I am not ITK but my source has close connections to the club. Strange that, cause according to local NW radio Connor Wickham has opted to is signed for Sunderland and won't join Liverpool Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest magpie99 Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 He's probably been told to go somewhere he'll be guaranteed first choice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzza Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Heard from a reliable source yesterday that he is signing for the mackems next week, after the 1st July. Also, Makems bid for Wickham apparently not true. CW is definitely signing for Liverpool. I am not ITK but my source has close connections to the club. I'm sure i've heard that line for the past 18 months or so. The reliable source is the voices in his head that are constantly whispering to him that our club is doomed. As I randonmly squirted my HP over my bacon this morning, the word Erdinc could be deciphered by squinting and crossing my eyes simultaneously.... DOES THIS MEAN SOMETHING? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Heard from a reliable source yesterday that he is signing for the mackems next week, after the 1st July. Also, Makems bid for Wickham apparently not true. CW is definitely signing for Liverpool. I am not ITK but my source has close connections to the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Meanwhile, it is understood United are still in the hunt for Charles N’Zogbia. Sources close to the midfielder claim Sunderland are struggling to put together a package to attract the Frenchman to Wearside and N’Zogbia is still holding out for a return to the black-and-whites. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 As many have probably said, this one will probably drag on till the deadline. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggs Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Meanwhile, it is understood United are still in the hunt for Charles N’Zogbia. Sources close to the midfielder claim Sunderland are struggling to put together a package to attract the Frenchman to Wearside and N’Zogbia is still holding out for a return to the black-and-whites. Certainly a no news day from the Chronicle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richo Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Didn't they say the other day that we were no longer interested in Le Zog? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Meanwhile, it is understood United are still in the hunt for Charles N’Zogbia. Sources close to the midfielder claim Sunderland are struggling to put together a package to attract the Frenchman to Wearside and N’Zogbia is still holding out for a return to the black-and-whites. Certainly a no news day from the Chronicle Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmelads Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 As many have probably said, this one will probably drag on till the deadline. You're right and the risk is that we will lose out on him last minute and be left short of players. There's a reason clubs like Man Utd pay that bit extra and get them in early. Added bonus being that the player has a whole pre-season with the club, is better integrated in the dressing room, training etc, has more chance to work on his role in the team and also has less chance of injury. We've done the right thing getting players in early but we've also signed two bosmans, triggered a transfer clause and are targetting another transfer clause (Neil Taylor) to replace one of the best left backs in the league. I think people have a right to wonder why the club would drag its heels over bringing in a player such as N'Zogbia who is available at very good value and would command an important place in our first team. I personally hope the deal is done quickly because I can see other clubs coming in if/when their targets go elsewhere. I know that a club like ours has to be slightly more wily than Man Utd in the transfer market but just as the Carroll and Milner sales left us short on players, I'm wary of it happening again. Ashley likes a game of brinkmanship but if bigger clubs miss their targets they will take a look at N'Zogbia - it is not a simple case of just sitting back and making Wigan sweat. If we get him on deadline day for 2m less then fair enough but is it worth risking a weak squad til January, or signing an inferior player, just to do so? Successful clubs generally don't think this way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 Thing is, we have enough midfielders already. We could miss out on Zog and still have a better midfield than last season, assuming nobody else goes. Hope we get him like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 As many have probably said, this one will probably drag on till the deadline. You're right and the risk is that we will lose out on him last minute and be left short of players. There's a reason clubs like Man Utd pay that bit extra and get them in early. Added bonus being that the player has a whole pre-season with the club, is better integrated in the dressing room, training etc, has more chance to work on his role in the team and also has less chance of injury. We've done the right thing getting players in early but we've also signed two bosmans, triggered a transfer clause and are targetting another transfer clause (Neil Taylor) to replace one of the best left backs in the league. I think people have a right to wonder why the club would drag its heels over bringing in a player such as N'Zogbia who is available at very good value and would command an important place in our first team. I know that a club like ours has to be slightly more wily than Man Utd in the transfer market but just as the Carroll and Milner sales left us short on players, I'm wary of it happening again. Ashley likes a game of brinkmanship but if bigger clubs miss their targets they will take a look at N'Zogbia - it is not a simple case of just sitting back and making Wigan sweat. If we get him on deadline day for 2m less then fair enough but is it worth risking a weak squad til January, or signing an inferior player, just to do so? Successful clubs generally don't think this way. So it's not to have depth at left back then? Also you say successful clubs don't wait to the last minute, then point to the sale of Carroll at the last minute that left us short, funnily enough sold to one of the most successful clubs in British football history to replace a player that was sold to one of the most successful British clubs of the last decade, all at the last minute. Chelsea and Liverpool had no problem waiting so why judge it by what Man Utd have done? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmelads Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 As many have probably said, this one will probably drag on till the deadline. You're right and the risk is that we will lose out on him last minute and be left short of players. There's a reason clubs like Man Utd pay that bit extra and get them in early. Added bonus being that the player has a whole pre-season with the club, is better integrated in the dressing room, training etc, has more chance to work on his role in the team and also has less chance of injury. We've done the right thing getting players in early but we've also signed two bosmans, triggered a transfer clause and are targetting another transfer clause (Neil Taylor) to replace one of the best left backs in the league. I think people have a right to wonder why the club would drag its heels over bringing in a player such as N'Zogbia who is available at very good value and would command an important place in our first team. I know that a club like ours has to be slightly more wily than Man Utd in the transfer market but just as the Carroll and Milner sales left us short on players, I'm wary of it happening again. Ashley likes a game of brinkmanship but if bigger clubs miss their targets they will take a look at N'Zogbia - it is not a simple case of just sitting back and making Wigan sweat. If we get him on deadline day for 2m less then fair enough but is it worth risking a weak squad til January, or signing an inferior player, just to do so? Successful clubs generally don't think this way. So it's not to have depth at left back then? Also you say successful clubs don't wait to the last minute, then point to the sale of Carroll at the last minute that left us short, funnily enough sold to one of the most successful clubs in British football history to replace a player that was sold to one of the most successful British clubs of the last decade. Chelsea and Liverpool had no problem waiting so why judge it by what Man Utd have done? And look at the form of Carroll and Torres since, without a pre-season with their new teams they have been poor. Both were widely seen as panic signings. They may come good next season but when you look at the money spent, they bloody well should. Both are an example of what happens when you do your shopping on deadline day. As for Neil Taylor, I'd be happy as anyone if Enrique stays but at the moment it looks unlikely. At the moment he, or anyone else who comes in, looks likely to be Enrique's replacement, not back up or 'depth' as you put it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatwax Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 As many have probably said, this one will probably drag on till the deadline. You're right and the risk is that we will lose out on him last minute and be left short of players. There's a reason clubs like Man Utd pay that bit extra and get them in early. Added bonus being that the player has a whole pre-season with the club, is better integrated in the dressing room, training etc, has more chance to work on his role in the team and also has less chance of injury. We've done the right thing getting players in early but we've also signed two bosmans, triggered a transfer clause and are targetting another transfer clause (Neil Taylor) to replace one of the best left backs in the league. I think people have a right to wonder why the club would drag its heels over bringing in a player such as N'Zogbia who is available at very good value and would command an important place in our first team. I know that a club like ours has to be slightly more wily than Man Utd in the transfer market but just as the Carroll and Milner sales left us short on players, I'm wary of it happening again. Ashley likes a game of brinkmanship but if bigger clubs miss their targets they will take a look at N'Zogbia - it is not a simple case of just sitting back and making Wigan sweat. If we get him on deadline day for 2m less then fair enough but is it worth risking a weak squad til January, or signing an inferior player, just to do so? Successful clubs generally don't think this way. So it's not to have depth at left back then? Also you say successful clubs don't wait to the last minute, then point to the sale of Carroll at the last minute that left us short, funnily enough sold to one of the most successful clubs in British football history to replace a player that was sold to one of the most successful British clubs of the last decade, all at the last minute. Chelsea and Liverpool had no problem waiting so why judge it by what Man Utd have done? The same Man Utd that signed Berbatov last minute. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 As many have probably said, this one will probably drag on till the deadline. You're right and the risk is that we will lose out on him last minute and be left short of players. There's a reason clubs like Man Utd pay that bit extra and get them in early. Added bonus being that the player has a whole pre-season with the club, is better integrated in the dressing room, training etc, has more chance to work on his role in the team and also has less chance of injury. We've done the right thing getting players in early but we've also signed two bosmans, triggered a transfer clause and are targetting another transfer clause (Neil Taylor) to replace one of the best left backs in the league. I think people have a right to wonder why the club would drag its heels over bringing in a player such as N'Zogbia who is available at very good value and would command an important place in our first team. I know that a club like ours has to be slightly more wily than Man Utd in the transfer market but just as the Carroll and Milner sales left us short on players, I'm wary of it happening again. Ashley likes a game of brinkmanship but if bigger clubs miss their targets they will take a look at N'Zogbia - it is not a simple case of just sitting back and making Wigan sweat. If we get him on deadline day for 2m less then fair enough but is it worth risking a weak squad til January, or signing an inferior player, just to do so? Successful clubs generally don't think this way. So it's not to have depth at left back then? Also you say successful clubs don't wait to the last minute, then point to the sale of Carroll at the last minute that left us short, funnily enough sold to one of the most successful clubs in British football history to replace a player that was sold to one of the most successful British clubs of the last decade. Chelsea and Liverpool had no problem waiting so why judge it by what Man Utd have done? And look at the form of Carroll and Torres since, without a pre-season with their new teams they have been poor. Both were widely seen as panic signings. They may come good next season but when you look at the money spent, they bloody well should. Both are an example of what happens when you do your shopping on deadline day. As for Neil Taylor, I'd be happy as anyone if Enrique stays but at the moment it looks unlikely. Carroll was injured and Torres was out of form before he went there, do you honestly think if they bought them earlier in the window their form would have been any different? Look at the likes of Berbatov and Ashley Cole, both clubs were happy to wait until the window was nearly closed to push through the signings they want so the example that Man Utd get it done early isn't always the case. Ideally all of the new players would be here already but it just doesn't work like that, that's the same for any club too and not just Newcastle and the thought of paying an extra £2 million to get someone through the door a few weeks earlier is daft IMO. Btw if Enrique goes that doesn't mean Taylor will be the only left back brought into the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmelads Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 The same Man Utd that signed Berbatov last minute. Was that because they spent the whole time haggling ? As with Liverpool and Chelsea in the earlier examples, they did not wait til late August to get a cheaper deal, as people here are arguing we should do with N'Zogbia. In all of those cases, the selling club were very reluctant to sell. In N'Zogbia's case, the selling club are happy to let go. Perhaps some don't rate the player as highly which is fair enough, and wouldn't mind us targetting someone else. I'm just not convinced we can get a player as proven in the Premier League. Given our other signings have been players with fitness concerns or no Premier League experience, to bring in N'Zogbia after the season he's just had would be a big boost. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 If the deal was as simple as that, and good value, we'd have already done it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmelads Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 As many have probably said, this one will probably drag on till the deadline. You're right and the risk is that we will lose out on him last minute and be left short of players. There's a reason clubs like Man Utd pay that bit extra and get them in early. Added bonus being that the player has a whole pre-season with the club, is better integrated in the dressing room, training etc, has more chance to work on his role in the team and also has less chance of injury. We've done the right thing getting players in early but we've also signed two bosmans, triggered a transfer clause and are targetting another transfer clause (Neil Taylor) to replace one of the best left backs in the league. I think people have a right to wonder why the club would drag its heels over bringing in a player such as N'Zogbia who is available at very good value and would command an important place in our first team. I know that a club like ours has to be slightly more wily than Man Utd in the transfer market but just as the Carroll and Milner sales left us short on players, I'm wary of it happening again. Ashley likes a game of brinkmanship but if bigger clubs miss their targets they will take a look at N'Zogbia - it is not a simple case of just sitting back and making Wigan sweat. If we get him on deadline day for 2m less then fair enough but is it worth risking a weak squad til January, or signing an inferior player, just to do so? Successful clubs generally don't think this way. So it's not to have depth at left back then? Also you say successful clubs don't wait to the last minute, then point to the sale of Carroll at the last minute that left us short, funnily enough sold to one of the most successful clubs in British football history to replace a player that was sold to one of the most successful British clubs of the last decade. Chelsea and Liverpool had no problem waiting so why judge it by what Man Utd have done? And look at the form of Carroll and Torres since, without a pre-season with their new teams they have been poor. Both were widely seen as panic signings. They may come good next season but when you look at the money spent, they bloody well should. Both are an example of what happens when you do your shopping on deadline day. As for Neil Taylor, I'd be happy as anyone if Enrique stays but at the moment it looks unlikely. Carroll was injured and Torres was out of form before he went there, do you honestly think if they bought them earlier in the window their form would have been any different? Look at the likes of Berbatov and Ashley Cole, both clubs were happy to wait until the window was nearly closed to push through the signings they want so the example that Man Utd get it done early isn't always the case. Ideally all of the new players would be here already but it just doesn't work like that, that's the same for any club too and not just Newcastle and the thought of paying an extra £2 million to get someone through the door a few weeks earlier is daft IMO. Btw if Enrique goes that doesn't mean Taylor will be the only left back brought into the club. Well Carroll and Torres were signed in the January window not the summer window. When they have had a full pre-season with their clubs then yes I predict they will fare better. Of course it's daft not to wait a few weeks, if the player is convinced to come to us. But is he? I can see him being in demand and it may be the club that pays more that gets him, that's business. At what price do we wait on these kinds of players, when the selling club is willing to do a deal at a decent price? There is logic in both arguments, either is a risk. You would risk losing out on the player late on and chase a replacement, fair enough. I'd risk paying that bit more to make sure I have a top player and don't lose him to a rival. I guess it depends how much the player wants to come here, as to how the club can swing it in our favour. The Carroll, Torres and Berbatov deals are fair examples but in all cases those clubs were reluctant to sell which dragged the deal on, not because the big clubs buying were holding out for a lower price. I don't think Wigan are reluctant to sell N'Zogbia, they've basically said he can go. As for Neil Taylor, I'll be amazed if we sign two new left backs. Most likely whoever comes in will be Enrique's replacement and Ferguson would be used as cover or a converted right back. If Neil Taylor came in then I would expect him to be the Enrique replacement. But anyway that's for a different thread. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baggio Posted June 28, 2011 Share Posted June 28, 2011 As many have probably said, this one will probably drag on till the deadline. You're right and the risk is that we will lose out on him last minute and be left short of players. There's a reason clubs like Man Utd pay that bit extra and get them in early. Added bonus being that the player has a whole pre-season with the club, is better integrated in the dressing room, training etc, has more chance to work on his role in the team and also has less chance of injury. We've done the right thing getting players in early but we've also signed two bosmans, triggered a transfer clause and are targetting another transfer clause (Neil Taylor) to replace one of the best left backs in the league. I think people have a right to wonder why the club would drag its heels over bringing in a player such as N'Zogbia who is available at very good value and would command an important place in our first team. I know that a club like ours has to be slightly more wily than Man Utd in the transfer market but just as the Carroll and Milner sales left us short on players, I'm wary of it happening again. Ashley likes a game of brinkmanship but if bigger clubs miss their targets they will take a look at N'Zogbia - it is not a simple case of just sitting back and making Wigan sweat. If we get him on deadline day for 2m less then fair enough but is it worth risking a weak squad til January, or signing an inferior player, just to do so? Successful clubs generally don't think this way. So it's not to have depth at left back then? Also you say successful clubs don't wait to the last minute, then point to the sale of Carroll at the last minute that left us short, funnily enough sold to one of the most successful clubs in British football history to replace a player that was sold to one of the most successful British clubs of the last decade. Chelsea and Liverpool had no problem waiting so why judge it by what Man Utd have done? And look at the form of Carroll and Torres since, without a pre-season with their new teams they have been poor. Both were widely seen as panic signings. They may come good next season but when you look at the money spent, they bloody well should. Both are an example of what happens when you do your shopping on deadline day. As for Neil Taylor, I'd be happy as anyone if Enrique stays but at the moment it looks unlikely. Carroll was injured and Torres was out of form before he went there, do you honestly think if they bought them earlier in the window their form would have been any different? Look at the likes of Berbatov and Ashley Cole, both clubs were happy to wait until the window was nearly closed to push through the signings they want so the example that Man Utd get it done early isn't always the case. Ideally all of the new players would be here already but it just doesn't work like that, that's the same for any club too and not just Newcastle and the thought of paying an extra £2 million to get someone through the door a few weeks earlier is daft IMO. Btw if Enrique goes that doesn't mean Taylor will be the only left back brought into the club. Well Carroll and Torres were signed in the January window not the summer window. When they have had a full pre-season with their clubs then yes I predict they will fare better. Of course it's daft not to wait a few weeks, if the player is convinced to come to us. But is he? I can see him being in demand and it may be the club that pays more that gets him, that's business. At what price do we wait on these kinds of players, when the selling club is willing to do a deal at a decent price? There is logic in both arguments, either is a risk. You would risk losing out on the player late on and chase a replacement, fair enough. I'd risk paying that bit more to make sure I have a top player and don't lose him to a rival. I guess it depends how much the player wants to come here, as to how the club can swing it in our favour. The Carroll, Torres and Berbatov deals are fair examples but in all cases those clubs were reluctant to sell which dragged the deal on, not because the big clubs buying were holding out for a lower price. I don't think Wigan are reluctant to sell N'Zogbia, they've basically said he can go. As for Neil Taylor, I'll be amazed if we sign two new left backs. Most likely whoever comes in will be Enrique's replacement and Ferguson would be used as cover or a converted right back. If Neil Taylor came in then I would expect him to be the Enrique replacement. But anyway that's for a different thread. Last I heard from Wigan they wanted £3 million more from non champions league clubs so there's no way I'd pay that. Realistically we will have a feel of what N'Zogbia wants to do through his agent and if we know we're his preferred choice then we can afford to hold out to get him on more favourable terms than paying more than we would if we were in the CL, I think the Ben Arfa deal is a good example of this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now